A growing cloud of trash threatens space tourism and has experts scrambling to clear the mess
By Ker Than
Posted 06.27.2008 at 1:58 pm
Trash Collectors: Robots could gain momentum to change orbit by swinging weighted tethers like a discus thrower does. This would move them to large pieces of old debris, to which they would attach Terminator Tethers.
John MacNeil
Along with satellites and space stations, Earth is surrounded by tens of millions of pieces of floating space debris. Like any landfill, the trash is diverse, ranging from dead satellites to castaway rocket parts to flecks of paint. On average, over the past 40 years, one piece of space junk has fallen to Earth every day.

Laser Brooms: Baseball-size pieces of debris are too small for tethers but large enough to pierce spacecraft. Hitting them with lasers would disrupt their orbit, causing them to fall and burn up. John MacNeil
Space agencies have managed to avoid major in-flight catastrophes with protective shielding and deft maneuvering of manned vehicles and satellites. But if we keep launching satellites and do nothing about the mess, the amount of unpredictable debris in orbit will make already-risky manned spaceflight more dangerous.
Scientists at NASA and private companies have devised several ways for clearing the sky. Although some methods are admittedly outlandish, says Nicholas Johnson, the chief scientist for orbital debris at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas, a few are possible with today’s technology.
One early idea was to have robotic trash collectors shove large pieces of junk through the atmosphere so that they mostly burn up before hitting the ground. But the fuel costs for destroying a significant amount of debris with such craft has quashed this approach.

Space Flypaper: A half-mile-wide “Nerf ball” could intercept small debris, reducing their orbital energy so that they lose altitude quickly. Hang-ups include keeping the ball afloat and away from functional satellites. John MacNeil
A more feasible plan is to attach miles-long “electrodynamic tethers,” wound on a spool, to all new satellites. Once a satellite ends its mission, it would deploy the cable and Earth’s magnetic field would induce an electric current in it. This interaction imparts a force on the craft that pushes it through the atmosphere until most of it burns up harmlessly, says Rob Hoyt, the president and chief scientist of Tethers Unlimited, a company working to develop the technology.
Tether demonstrations have so far yielded limited success or failed outright, but despite the setbacks, Johnson and others are optimistic that the tech could be ready in a few years. Here, a look at how the tethers might make the sky safe for space travel.
- Step 1 After a spacecraft completes its mission, a three-mile-long Terminator Tether that is attached to the satellite unravels from its spool.
-
Step 2 Interactions between the Earth’s magnetic field and the charged ionosphere create and drive an electrical current in the metal tether.
-
Step 3 The current generates a Lorentz force—a phenomenon that affects charged particles moving in magnetic fields—that opposes the spacecraft’s orbital motion.
-
Step 4 Over the next weeks or months, the Lorentz force pushes the craft to lower altitudes, until it mostly burns up in Earth’s atmosphere.
Comments
You must admit, that is some pretty cool stuff!
JT
0 out of 2 people found this comment helpfulwww.FireMe.To/udi
Thats a lot more technical than my idea of a giant space trashcan.
1 out of 2 people found this comment helpful.
CLEAN space from DANGEROUS debris and trash could be one of the BEST goals for a good COTS program...
unfortunately, the real (NASA funded) COTS are just a DUPLICATION of other (existing and future) ISS cargo and crew services, as explained in my "What's wrong in COTS" article:
http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/020wrongcots.html
in this article, I also suggest of to do a better COTS program
.
2 out of 2 people found this comment helpfulpost edit:
in this article, I also suggest... HOW ...to do a better COTS program
.
0 out of 0 people found this comment helpfulWhy don't they work out disposal before deployment?
2 out of 2 people found this comment helpfulfrom Geelong, Victoria
if someone was able to capture and recycle the junk, it would make feasibility less of a problem :P
0 out of 0 people found this comment helpfulWhy not orbit magnetic wands that suck the debris out of orbit? Using large orbiting magnets makes more sense, and would cost far less!
3 out of 3 people found this comment helpfulI think this technology is great but Im still amazed why this wasn't addressed earlier, if NASA wanted to continue to grow they should have made this a priority. They cant continually send up large satellites, space stations, etc. without cleaning this up!!!
2 out of 3 people found this comment helpful