Since 1998, when astronomers discovered that a mysterious force known as dark energy is blowing the universe apart, scientists have launched at least a dozen multimillion-dollar projects to figure out what, exactly, dark energy is. These range from the $71-million BigBOSS project to the $900-million Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, which is scheduled to see first light in 2019. But in an era of shrinking research funding, the advantage might go to scientists who can work on a shoestring budget—people such as Basque cosmologist Narciso “Txitxo” Benítez, who says he can scoop every one of those projects for less than $10 million.
Benítez is a cosmologist at the Institute of Astrophysics of Andalusia in Spain. During his 20-year career, he has published papers on both the most distant known supernova and the closest one, and he was a core member of the ALHAMBRA survey of galaxies. Now, he is on a mission to define dark energy (like hundreds of other astronomers around the world) and has launched a project called J-PAS to do it.

The first step in that long quest is to determine where dark energy is and where it’s been. Astronomers can do that by measuring the location and redshift of millions of galaxies, thereby mapping the universe’s expansion. As galaxies move away from Earth, the light they emit becomes stretched in the direction of the “red” end of the visible light spectrum. The more distant a star, the farther light emitted by that star has traveled through an expanding universe, and thus the more redshifted it will be. If the galaxies in one part of the sky are accelerating away from us more quickly than those in other places, then that part of the sky contains more dark energy.
Benítez is betting that a quick and dirty approach—locating as many galaxies as possible, as fast as possible—will win him the race. It’s a far different strategy from his competitors’. The BigBOSS project, for example, will examine 5,000 galaxies at a time, splitting the light that reaches its telescope into hundreds of individual wavelengths using a prism-like device known as a spectrograph. J-PAS will attempt to study about 60,000 galaxies at a time with a telescope and a 1,300-megapixel digital camera, the second largest in the world. The camera will photograph each swath of the sky 56 times, with 56 different filters, each one isolating different colors. By imaging a fifth of the entire sky, Benítez says he’ll measure the velocities of tens of millions of galaxies, producing enough data to start mapping dark energy by 2018—two years earlier than any of his competitors.
Benítez has about a hundred collaborators, mostly from Spain and Brazil, whose governments are providing most of the funding. Over the past two years, the Spanish government built a new observatory at a site 6,420 feet above sea level in Spain’s Sierra de Javalambre, an arid mountain range, specifically to house J-PAS’s instruments. In June Benítez’s group installed an 80-centimeter test telescope. If all goes well, the main instrument—a 2.5-meter telescope, still small by the standards of big astronomy—will begin imaging galaxies at the end of 2014.
Plenty of things could go wrong. The repetitive imaging process could cause delays. The camera, which Benítez has outsourced to an independent company, could be insufficiently accurate (most are built by academics). Even the observatory’s site could be a problem. Astronomical research typically takes place under the crystalline skies of Hawaii and Northern Chile, which get 300 clear nights a year. The J-PAS site will receive only about 190. As a result, many astronomers are skeptical about the project’s chances. David Schlegel, a lead researcher on BigBOSS, isn’t sure that J-PAS will be able to distinguish between different j-models of dark energy. Others say that Benítez has underestimated the challenges of building a working telescope from scratch. Joshua Frieman, director of the Dark Energy Survey, an ongoing redshift-measuring project, takes a more diplomatic view. “Science advances, in part, by people trying different things,” he says. “In the grand scheme of things, competition is healthy.”
The results of this competition could help predict the fate of the universe. If dark energy has varied throughout space or time, then the accelerating expansion of the universe could be temporary. But if dark energy is constant, the universe will likely keep expanding faster, pushing galaxies farther apart for eternity.
140 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.
Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
For our annual How It Works issue, we break down everything from the massive Falcon Heavy rocket to a tiny DNA sequencer that connects to a USB port. We also take a look at an ambitious plan for faster-than-light travel and dive into the billion-dollar science of dog food.
Plus the latest Legos, Cadillac's plug-in hybrid, a tractor built for the apocalypse, and more.

Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor:Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
Axion's and the effects of the Higgs field. We don't know enough about the mechanism of boson's and how they act with matter. We have effects that we knew for years about Bose Einstein Condensates and Bose Statistics, Fermi Condensates and Statistics but we haven't completely understood how this all works out. To understand bosons and how they work with matter that gives us macroscopic effects we call dark energy and dark matter may also enlighten us enough to allow us to combine them into a unified field theory. See this essay here that tries to define bosons and the Higgs field, aether, in a way of interacting with matter:
http://fqxi.org/data/essay-contest-files/Bennett_The_Indivisible_Ato.pdf
Ron Bennett
I wish Benítez the best of luck!!!!!
The pictures don't seem to go with the article. I think the caption on the Hubble Wide Field picture is wrong too. And what does Gilese 581g have to do with dark energy? Shouldn't the pictures clarify/compliment the article and not raise more questions?
I remember the days when The Big Bang was a theory. It still is, yet with articles like this, you can't tell. So we spend so much to set the books straight on theories built on theories and who knows where it can go. I have a feeling that discovery will lead to the recognition that we mist a detail that allowed large summons of money to be spent needlessly. Until then, the article could at least read "... and the hope is that is could lead to a greater understanding of the universe and insight into origin theories such as the Big Bang theory."
Who said there is only one "universe"? That only one "big bang" happened? There might have been many. Galaxies and stars and all matter can move around clogging and expanding into reborn forms continuously. Travelling in all directions. Wonder if this can be measured also. It's always more comfortable to try to define unknown and then call this definition "dark" rather than admit that we just don't know.
What if there is no "dark matter". What if we already "see" ad measure it - it just moves in different direction than we expect it to. And making blown up theories explaining why we don't know what is happening around?
I think we don't need to go far to the history for some big bang. Last supernova would do.
Dark energy doesn't exist. They will find something very close to the theory of dark matter but they will never find dark matter because dark matter isn't part of our universe.