You Built What?!
Modeled after a Nerf gun--but with 200,000 volts under the hood

Super Taser Michael Clinard

While browsing a bookstore near his home in Seattle last year, Rob Flickenger came across a graphic novel titled The Five Fists of Science. The story portrays inventor Nikola Tesla as a crime fighter who battles his enemies with a pair of handheld Tesla coils—transformers that discharge spectacular streams of electricity into the air. To Flickenger, 37, the guns were beautiful, hilarious, and inspiring. “I started thinking, How would I do it?” he says.

Flickenger wanted his homemade lightning machine to look as cool as the one in The Five Fists of Science, so he chose his model carefully: a huge motorized Nerf gun. With the help of Rusty Oliver at the HazardFactory, an industrial arts studio, he made an aluminum version of the plastic toy. He gathered cans, scrap metal, and even a bicycle fender and melted it all down. Then he and Oliver created a cast of the Nerf gun out of sand and clay and poured in the molten aluminum. After it hardened, Flickenger milled excess metal from the interior using a CNC machine and cleaned up the edges with a rotary tool.

Flickenger, who designs wireless infrastructure for developing countries, had previously taught himself the physics of high-voltage electricity through free online courses from MIT, and he had experimented with Tesla coils in the past. But the smaller size of a handheld model posed new challenges. It also gave Flickenger one big advantage over Tesla, he says: “We have really cheap Chinese power tools.” An 18-volt lithium-ion drill battery would be more than enough to power the gun.

The real hurdle was engineering the gun’s circuitry to safely generate high voltages. At one point, Flickenger wound conductive copper wire around a piece of acrylic tubing 1,100 times only to realize that the tubing was too fragile and would break apart easily. His early tests had mixed results. “I’d switch it on, and nothing would happen, so I’d switch it off. Then I’d switch it on again and set something on fire,” he says, half-joking. In fact, safety was a major priority—at first, he activated the gun via a remote switch only. Later, he added a toggle with an arm-the-missile-type plastic hood to prevent shooting the gun accidentally. Right now, the gun’s either on or off, but Flickenger plans to make it more like the cartoon version by adding a trigger.

When he finally got the gun working safely, Flickenger showed it off at his wedding reception, held on a friend’s property. The guests were delighted. “There’s a corona discharge that comes off the front that’s just beautiful,” he says. “It’s almost like a fluid.” Although the gun’s not suited for fighting crime, it’s extremely popular at parties.

(Get the specifics of the project and a video on the next page)

single page
Page 1 of 2 12next ›last »
Want to read more articles like this, plus tips and tricks, home hacks, DIY projects, and more? Subscribe to Popular Science today, for less than $1 per issue!

8 Comments

Now I need a bigger version of this... and a T-98... with an E.M. armor... MWAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!

Mad scientists... UNITE!!!!

Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.
Mark Twain

Yes, I agree, this is To beautiful, hilarious, and inspiring. WoWzers and Kudos to the inventor! ;)

You didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen.

I believe you used the word current a few times when you meant voltage. You would be doubling the voltage in transformers and voltage would reach 20000 volts, not current, current is measured in amperes. It is possible in a step down transformer to reduce the voltage and increase current capability but a van der graf generator,or this gun would work on high voltage and low current.

smaller version inside of an iphone

"iphone taser"

I think PS should be embarrassed to publish an article in which the author apparently doesn't understand what he is writing about. The sloppy use of "current" and "voltage" with no mention of "power" renders the entire description of this device technically meaningless. The article states "The gun generates a lethal amount of current, so Flickenger typically sets on his workbench instead of holding it himself." It might give someone a very unpleasant electrical shock, but would it generate a lethal current? Probably it would be more like a shock from a Taser ... very unpleasant but not lethal. Otherwise state what "lethal current" could be expected.

its an interesting gun. i never see this kind of gun before this gun is result of hard work i am surely want this gun foot long sparking is new invention in guns.

its an interesting gun. i never see this kind of gun before this gun is result of hard work i am surely want this gun foot long sparking is new invention in guns.

http://www.swordsswords.com/crossbow.aspx

Popular Tags

Regular Features


140 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.



Popular Science+ For iPad

Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page



Download Our App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed


February 2013: How To Build A Hero

Engineers are racing to build robots that can take the place of rescuers. That story, plus a city that storms can't break and how having fun could lead to breakthrough science.

Also! A leech detective, the solution to America's train-crash problems, the world's fastest baby carriage, and more.



Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email

Contributing Writers:
Clay Dillow | Email
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Colin Lecher | Email
Emily Elert | Email

Intern:
Shaunacy Ferro | Email

circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif
bmxmag-ps