Now that Food Tech week is winding down here at PopSci, it's time to sit back, rest our hands on the shelves of our full bellies and listen to the old timers tell us a few yarns about back in their day. We've already probed the archives for a few strange culinary suggestions, but there is more yet to come.
We've collected here a motley assortment of PopSci's past visions of the future of food, from milestone inventions like dehydration and quick-freezing, to off-the-wall ideas like whale farming, or shining UV light on gas to somehow create vegetable matter.
PopScis of old may not have envisioned a day when you could slice your breakfast pastry with a water jet, but we did think it was a good idea to shoot it full of atomic radiation. So, there's that.
140 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.
Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Engineers are racing to build robots that can take the place of rescuers. That story, plus a city that storms can't break and how having fun could lead to breakthrough science.
Also! A leech detective, the solution to America's train-crash problems, the world's fastest baby carriage, and more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Contributing Writers:
Clay Dillow | Email
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Colin Lecher | Email
Emily Elert | Email
Intern:
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
Exposing the food to radiation does not make it radioactive - it only kills bacteria and fungi. The chemicals we instead used to preserve it, such as nitrates, nitrites and high levels of salt in canning, and the increased problems with E. coli contamination, are turning out to be much more harmful.
The only reason the food industry can't preserve fresh produce and other food by sterilizing it with radiation is public perception and an article like this in Popular science about "atomic radiation" isn't helping any. Was this researched before this statement was made?
(There is a discussion of this over at the original food radiation article, and one of the commenters questioned the knowledge of two of the other commenters. My PhD is in plant biology, not nuclear chemistry, and since I'm just commenting and not writing an article, I didn't spend spend hours finding references. But this was true when I took an undergraduate course in Nuclear Chemistry and still true when I worked as a textbook editor. I know enough to want to put in the disclaimer for a fully informed audience that some elements can be made into radioactive isotopes by exposing them to the *right* type of radiation. However, the exposure of any one type of food to a specific type of radiation likely wouldn't make it as radioactive as the average banana, which contains potassium that has a natural occurring radioactive isotope. In any case, checking the radioactivity of the treated food only requires only a simple reading with a Geiger counter.)
Even though there is a discussion about this over at the original food radiation article, I wanted to address it here as well.