
Cole is building a two-seat electric plane called the Goshawk that he estimates will travel at an average speed of 102 mph and get the equivalent of 438 mpg. And later this year, Slovenian plane-maker Pipistrel will begin selling its Taurus Electro, a glider that uses an electric motor on takeoff. “Electric propulsion is where it’s at,” Moore says. The clearest benefit is efficiency. Whereas piston engines extract about 20 percent of the energy in gas, electric motors use at least 90 percent of the power stored in batteries. The biggest obstacle is packing enough on board. Cole’s Goshawk can hold only enough
lithium-ion batteries for a one-hour flight.
New designs also borrow ideas from cars, like plug-in gas-electric hybrids. The Green Prize competition will allow entrants to use familiar automotive technologies, such as diesel, biodiesel and electric. Although a 100mpg plane won’t emerge at this year’s competition, Seeley expects to see planes getting well above 30 miles per gallon, a big step toward a new wave of cleaner, greener personal aircraft. “It’s critical that small aircraft be shown to be highly efficient,” Moore says. “You’ve got to show that before people are going to accept a lot more aircraft in the sky.”
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.
Check out the best of what's new here.
I saw a show on a Red Bull plane that could go 300 mph with 100 hp... impressive to say the least
Is there enough energy in a regular gallon of 'regular' to do that or are we talking 'special brewed' gallon of gas?
as a pilot myself i would assume that they are referring to the industry standard fuel for piston powered general aviation aircraft, 100LL, or 100 octane low lead. It is about as energy dense as your going to get in a gallon of gasoline, but you still have the issue of lead being released into the air no matter how efficient you make it.
First of all the Cessna 172 is a 4 passenger aircraft that was first produced in 1956 and approximately 48000 have been produced. I seriously doubt that the four cylinder engine would pollute as much as the eight cylinder 57 Chevy. Even so of all the fuel used in the US approximately .5 % is used by small four passenger aircraft. Now I am all for cleaning up the environment but lets at least try to get some of the facts correct. Carl
The average person can barely keep a car on the road, much less a plane in the sky. Making something like this affordable is pointless.