Self-Assembling Nanogears via New Scientist

For years, creating the gears and sprockets needed to make a microscopic robot has required the expensive and time-consuming process of silicon etching. Carving out each individual piece with a laser has made producing more than a couple of pieces prohibitively difficult and costly.

A team at Columbia University now seems to have found a way around that problem. By laying a thin sheet of metal over a special layer of polymer, the team has created nanogears that assemble themselves, opening the possibility of much faster, cheaper, widespread production.

To make the gears, a thin copper sheet is laid over a heat-expanded polymer. When the polymer cools, it shrinks faster than the metal, which causes the metal to bend. When the metal bends, it creates regularly spaced teeth in the polymer, effectively making a microscopic gear. Stiffer metal that's harder to bend creates a gear with fewer, larger teeth, while a more supple metal creates gears with smaller, more numerous teeth.

The team has already made a number of different types of gears, all at the six-to-25 millimeter range, and are now ready to shrink the process down further, to create gears smaller than a micrometer.

However, even more than shrinking down the size of the gears, creating non-linear teeth looms as the real challenge, with the big payoff. If the Columbia team can figure out how to manipulate the polymer so that it cools preferentially in one or another direction, they can create the complicated gears needed to produce devices like a drive train. And once you can create self-assembling drive trains on the cheap, hordes of self-replicating nanobots are not far down the road.

[via New Scientist]

Want to learn more about breakthroughs in electronics, medicine, nanotech, and more?
Subscribe to Popular Science today, for less than $1 per issue!

9 Comments

It's confusing to read an article expecting a discussion in terms of nano-scale devices and see dimensions like "6 to 25 millimeters". I had to stop and reread the article to make sure that wasn't an error in units. There's a tremendous difference between mm and nm. I think I could make a mold to create a 6 mm gear in my garage. Come back when you've made something "extended to the sub-micrometer scale" then we'll get excited.

i dunno... the self replicating thing scares the crap out of me!!!

No, it's not nano yet, but it's a cool idea. Would be nice to see a video of the process in action -- even if it has to be time lapse.

Might be it is micrometer(µm)equal to10^-6m. Easy to mix with mm.

Might be it is micrometer(µm)equal to10^-6m. Easy to mix with mm.

Might be it is micrometer(µm)equal to10^-6m. Easy to mix with mm.

Its not self assembling its something else. It doesn't worry me. Its not self assembling things that worry me its self reproducing things. If a crystal self assembles it self nobody cares much. But if viruses start assembling them scares you get feeling of dread. If man made things that are harder to stamp out than viruses got out of the lab they'd be screaming!

@protn7
I agree, if scientists made some type of replicating nano-bot that would be able to consume the earth (reminds me of The Day The Earth Stood Still) I'd be screaming to.

I have one word: Replicators. I just hope that we stop short of the SG1 style replicators. Even though the article isn't about self replicating, modular, sentient robots.



June 2013: American Energy Independence

Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email

Contributing Writers:

Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email

circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif