The Sex Files
The clues are in her voice

Photo Quiz! Can you tell which one of these women is ovulating and which one is menstruating? Wikimedia Commons

“Are you on your period?” It’s a question most women have been asked at one point or another by their boyfriend or spouse during a disagreement. It turns out that some men actually can tell when it’s a woman’s time of the month—and it’s not because of bratty behavior.

In a study published online last month in the journal Ethology, psychologists Nathan Pipitone at Adams State College and Gordon Gallup at SUNY Albany asked three groups of men to listen to voice recordings of 10 women counting from one to five. Each woman was recorded four times over the course of one full menstrual cycle. (For those who aren’t familiar with the ins and outs of the female reproductive cycle, women are most fertile during ovulation, when their ovaries release an egg, and least fertile during menstruation, when they shed the unfertilized egg and the lining of the uterus.)

After the first group of men listened to all four recordings from each woman, played in random order, they were asked to guess which recordings were made during the women’s periods. The men had a one in four chance of guessing correctly, but they actually did so 35 percent of the time, a significant difference, the researchers say.

In 2008, Pipitone and Gallup showed that men find the voices of ovulating women more attractive than voices recorded during other points in the cycle, so for the second group in the new study, the researchers replaced the recording made closest to ovulation with one from a less fertile day. Even after the potentially telltale contrast was eliminated, the men pinpointed the voice recorded during menstruation 34 percent of the time.

Perhaps the most telling element of the study was the third experiment, in which a new group of men were not told that the research had anything to do with menstrual cycles. Instead they were asked to choose the most “unattractive” voice recording for each woman. They chose the menstrual recording significantly more often than was predicted by chance—again, 34 percent of the time.

In fact, according to the researchers’ calculations, all three groups singled out the voices recorded during menstruation more often than any of the other voices.

So what was it about the women’s voices that gave away their reproductive status? The men in group one who correctly identified the menstrual recordings said they could tell by the mood (bad versus good), quality (harsh versus smooth), pitch (low versus high) and speed (slow versus fast) of the women’s voices. When the second two groups were asked to score the voices based on these characteristics, they reported that menstrual voices sounded lower in mood, quality and pitch. “The men seemed to determine menstrual voices by picking the most unattractive voice,” Pipitone explains.

There’s already evidence that men subconsciously judge where a woman is in her cycle—lap dancers make 80 percent more money in tips when they’re ovulating compared to when they’re menstruating, according to a 2007 paper—but the new study is the first to demonstrate one way men make that determination.

A subconscious (and often conscious) aversion to menstruation makes sense in evolutionary terms, since males wanting to pass on their genes are better off seeking out females closer to ovulation. Over time, the ability to parse a woman’s menstrual cycle could have proliferated, as more perceptive men reproduced more successfully.

Pipitone says the adaptation is an example of the reproductive arms race known as sexually antagonistic coevolution, a phenomenon seen across living species, from humans to brine shrimp. Males show more interest in females when they’re fertile, so it makes sense that human females—who need a lot of help to raise their particularly helpless infants—hide their fertility status. (Female chimps, by contrast, broadcast their fertility with engorged genitalia.) Theoretically, human males retaliated by developing the ability to detect more subtle fertility cues such as those “leaked” by the female voice.

Hormones induce the vocal changes that give women away. “Vocal production is closely tied to our biology,” Pipitone says of men and women. For example, “Cells from the larynx and vagina are very similar and show similar hormone receptors.” The result is that, “The sound of a person’s voice contains a surprising amount of reproductively relevant information,” Gallup says. The obvious example: By speaking on the phone, we can determine a person’s gender and age. But researchers have also shown that voices alone can be used to directly and indirectly predict characteristics like facial appearance, body type, physical strength and even sexual behavior.

I think one of the most interesting results of the study is that across the board, men chose the menstrual voice around a third of the time. It would seem some men are more perceptive to women’s cycles than others. Pipitone and Gallup plan to investigate this question next.

Jennifer Abbasi is a science and health writer and editor living in Brooklyn. Follow Jen on Twitter (she's @jenabbasi) and email her at popsci.thesexfiles@gmail.com.

19 Comments

and they say men don't listen

So scientifically woman project a voice of desire to get laid when it’s time to make a baby. When the timing is wrong for them, they project a voice to keep men at a distance.
This is science of the obvious.
I guess what makes it truly scientific is somebody quantified it.

.............................
Science sees no further than what it can sense.
Religion sees beyond the senses.

"Science sees no further than what it can sense.
Religion sees beyond the senses."
Lies!, Lies!, Lies!, Lies!, Lies!, Lies!
Any who if it where that obious then why has it not been able to be investigated rigth after the invention of the phonograph? huh no answer do you have?

I find the screaming is usually a dead give away. Come on...someone had to say it.

Perceptive men can tell a lot about a woman from their hands. For example, if you find them around your throat, it is likely that she is unhappy with you.

so it is like a jedi mind trick? wow awesome.

"religion is like a prison for the seekers of wisdom"

-Killah Priest

The picture on the left is ovulating!
How do I know? I just got a text message from her!
WOWzerS!

.............................
Science sees no further than what it can sense.
Religion sees beyond the senses.

1 in 4 chance is 25%, the men guessed 10% more than pure random shots... Is that significant popsci? I'm not convinced but I'm sure Jen- the Reporter is on her rag. I have a 50/50% chance of being right. Thats not science, its statistics.

" Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." Albert Einstein

Interesting, though I'm not incredibly impressed by the statistics. Personally, I'm usually in an insanely good mood when I'm having my period, so uh, maybe people like me threw the numbers off. :)

@tessmarie, my girlfriend is just the same, in fact other studies have shown that some women who are menstruating do not show symptoms like other women do, and can in fact feel great, sometimes more sexually active than when they're ovulating. So it puts the study back at a random shot again, you either guess right or wrong based on pitches. They omitted pheromones, touch, and taste, which is SIGNIFICANTLY crucial in reliable data to once and for all prove men can tell if women are on they're menstrual cycle.

" Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." Albert Einstein

This was on he History Channel like 2-3years ago.......

There is an App for that. check out Angry Girl App
itunes.apple.com/us/app/angry-girl/id483329743?ls=1&mt=8

35% when you would expect only 25%? This is simple confirmation of life experience that shows that about 10% of men do really well with women. The rest of us still think that the two photos shown above are actually of a woman ...

I wonder if there's a connect between Men with high levels of empathy, and their ability to notice such differences. I've read that a man has to be at the 85th percentile of empathy (not sure what scale/measure is used) for them to reach the level of empathy of the average female. This would again be common sense, but something a master's student could write their thesis on... probably already is one some where...

Also, go to hell, gotchabeb.

Timbo227,
It has been noted at least in USA statistically that the narcissistic frame of mind is increasing. This applies both to male and females. Also this implies empathy, compassion and caring for others is down, while love only one self is up.

I believe a man or a woman can be anything they wish to be including highly sensitive and caring. In the USA we have clearly defined gender roles and as we celebrate minority holidays we clearly define segments of society creating defined distance between ourselves.

I wish for all men and woman to pursue whatever goal or aspiration, dream they wish to chase. And I wish this nonsense of religious and ethnic holidays would stop and we celebrate individuals for their wonderful individual contributions as a HUMAN RACE!

WE NEED TO GET INTOUCH WITH BEING HUMAN AND OUR HUMAN BROTHERS AND SISTERS AND THOSE IN NEED!

WE SHOULD FOCUS ON KEEPING OUR HEARTS SIMPLE AND LOVE AND CHERISH OUR HUMANS AND BE BE SUPPORTIVE OF ALL!

.............................
Science sees no further than what it can sense.
Religion sees beyond the senses.

I agree Robot. There are a lot less of us "shirt off our backs" people around. The way this is the most obvious, to me, is when it comes to something as simple as a crosswalk. It takes a bit of thinking of others to stop for one (aside from the law factor) because it requires someone to take that extra few seconds out of their time to stop and let someone cross. Most times, people won't stop. Even if they see someone else has stopped for it.

Why this is may be unclear. A product of unpbringing? A result of most families having both parents work? An overall rushed modern lifestyle? A combination of a lot of factors are likely the culprit. It may be a catalyst responsible for the declanation of America as well.

As for the article itself. I'm not convinced. 35% seems awefully low for something that is implied as being an evolutionary adaptation. If it was something evolved as a survival "instinct" to spread the genes, I would expect a much higher percentage, maybe in the 70% range. 70% would still indicate, to me, that it was an evolutionary adaptation and the drop from a high of say maybe 90's would indicate that it is a sense going on the decline. I don't feel it is a sense (if it was truely used) that would not be used for the past possibly few hundred years.

I think there is a certain rhythm to that method...

Robert1234: Religion is the greatest evil invented by man.


140 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.



Popular Science+ For iPad

Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page



Download Our App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed


February 2013: How To Build A Hero

Engineers are racing to build robots that can take the place of rescuers. That story, plus a city that storms can't break and how having fun could lead to breakthrough science.

Also! A leech detective, the solution to America's train-crash problems, the world's fastest baby carriage, and more.



Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email

Contributing Writers:
Clay Dillow | Email
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Colin Lecher | Email
Emily Elert | Email

Intern:
Shaunacy Ferro | Email

circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif
bmxmag-ps