Feature
Overhauling inefficient plants and an ancient grid

Make Energy Like Plants Do Paul Wootton

A 2006 study at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory found that power interruptions cost the economy about $79 billion annually, or about one third of national electric spending, thanks to our aging grid. Meanwhile, energy use is expected to grow by 1,150 terawatt-hours—the equivalent of adding 13 New York Cities—by 2030. A smarter power grid will surely help, but we’ll need additional innovations like these to keep up with spiking demand.

Make Energy like Plants Do


Task: Convert sunlight into chemical energy
Status: Last year, scientists found a plentiful raw material that can free oxygen from water

Solar panels are not the only energy-harvesting strategy under the sun. For years, scientists have also been trying to do what plants do—use sunlight to photosynthesize fuel. Until now, most approaches relied on impractically scarce materials like iridium as a catalyst that triggers the reaction. But last year, researchers at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory figured out how to use cobalt oxide, one of the most abundant industrial catalysts. To overcome the relative inefficiency with which cobalt oxide uses sunlight to crack water molecules and free the oxygen, researchers layered the catalyst on a tightly stacked scaffold that makes it effectively 1,600 times as efficient. The net result: Arrays of cobalt-oxide panels could provide a steady supply of oxygen, protons and electrons. The next goal is to find a similarly efficient second catalyst to transform the by-products into an energy-dense fuel like methanol to give gasoline a run for its money.

Hang Superconducting Cables that Won’t Leak Electricity

Task: Replace miles of copper wire with cables that carry up to 10 times as much electricity per cubic inch
Status: 10–20 years to wide use

Instead of clearing paths for thousands of miles of new power lines to carry renewable energy across the country, we could restring the existing ones to run with high-temperature superconducting cables like those being studied at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The cables transmit electricity along a one-micrometer-thick superconductive layer of tape wrapped around a stainless-steel tube full of liquid nitrogen that cools the line down below –321ºF. In that chilled superconducting state, the lines lose no energy to resistance (today’s copper cables lose 5 to 7 percent).

Cram More Copper Underground:  Paul Wootton

Cram More Copper Underground

Task: Replace thousands of miles of buried wire with a better-insulated version that carries 25 percent more power
Status: 5–10 years away from widespread use

In urban areas, overhead power lines are a nuisance and a danger, which means most electricity crosses the city in underground tubes. As urban power demands increase, we could rip up streets to lay new lines, but an easier solution is just to cram more copper into the conduits we already have. That’s what the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), an industry R&D consortium, is aiming for with a new insulation material that’s embedded with vinylsilane-coated particles of silicon dioxide to give it 33 percent more insulating ability than existing line coatings. That means the next generation of power lines could carry up to a quarter more current without adding any more bulky insulation.

Underground Power Lines that heal themselves

Task: Coat cables with a self-repairing salve
Status: Commercially available in 10–15 years

Another way to dig up fewer streets is to avoid unearthing cables for small repairs. Whenever there’s a nick or hairline crack in an insulation sheath, the electrical field in the underlying copper subtly shifts. In a new insulation being developed by EPRI, nanoparticles sensitive to this shift heat up and melt surrounding polymer molecules, forming a fresh protective scar. As today’s decrepit lines gradually go kaput (about a quarter are already past their intended lifetime), EPRI hopes to replace them with these self-mending ones.

Copper-Crawling Robots

Copper-Crawling Robots:  Paul Wootton
Task: Deploy fleets of nimble robots that scoot along power lines, looking for flaws so that humans don’t have to
Status: First commercial versions around 2012

Conventional inspection is slow and expensive, often requiring a helicopter flyby. EPRI is working on a robot that can autonomously survey an 80-mile length of line twice a year for cheaper and more reliable inspections. The robot will straddle the line, carrying a camera, a diffused scanning laser and on-board image-analysis software, which it will use to construct both a visual history of the deterioration of the line, as well as a 3-D map of encroaching tree branches and other potential problems.

Add Storage to the Grid

Task: Build plants full of spinning drums that store electricity, so we can finally save surplus energy
Status: 20-megawatt plant under construction in Stephentown, N.Y.

Incredibly, today’s grid has practically no storage capacity. The electricity coming out of your socket was generated less than a millisecond ago, so power plants have to continually generate enough energy for the biggest spikes. To prepare for the power fluctuations endemic to renewable energy, we’ll need to inventory excess power to use during cloudy, windless afternoons and nights. The Massachusetts-based company Beacon Power’s solution is to store the grid’s surplus energy in hundreds of spinning carbon-fiber-and-fiberglass drums. Each of its Generation 4 flywheels features a 2,500-pound rotor mounted on magnetic bearings and sealed in a vacuum to create a near-friction-free environment. Energy coming in from the grid accelerates the three-foot rotor to 16,000 rpm (about Mach 2), where it keeps spinning with at least 97 percent efficiency. To pump energy back into the grid, some of the rotational energy is bled off to power a generator on the main shaft. Each flywheel can store a 15-minute, 100-kilowatt charge and can discharge 150,000 times over 20 years.

Add Storage to the Grid:  Paul Wootton

Read the rest of PopSci's plan to rebuild America here.

11 Comments

Cram More Copper Underground

"Overheard" powerlines. Do you mean overhead?

Generating power locally will cut the need for long-distance transmission: focusfusion.org. But the availability of power at 1/20 of current costs will undoubtedly require much local upgrading. As will the demands of electric vehicles.

All of these are great ideas but if you really want to change things then start beaming energy from one place to another -- we already do this on a much smaller scale every time you turn on your TV using a dish network receiver that is transmitted by microwaves.

See beamed energy here:

www.shineinnovations.com/6112.html

Ron Bennett

The first picture hurts my brain.

Beamed power is cool - but I think we're still a ways out from general population implementation. Wouldn't that system will be pretty lossy between the laser dispersion into, and from space? Fiber optics have a dedicated path, and still require re-amplification. Even beaming to a substation for distribution - what happens if there's atmospheric interference like satellite TV during a thunderstorm?

The proposed ideas are definitely worth further investigation. But, for all of the talk from our government about new ways to make and move energy, there seems to be awfully little discussion about reducing the amount wasted by consumers. There is still much potential for improvement.

Why can't we decentralize electrical generation as the primary, and in most parts of the world, the 'only' means of production? PS has an article - www.popsci.com/bown/2009/product/ist-energy-gem - about the GEM. Let's strive to solve two problems by developing this type of technology.

Consider the following rough calculations:
4 people/house x 4.6 lbs waste/day = 18.4 lbs/house/day
18.4 waste/house/day x 108 houses = 1 ton

If my calculations are correct we could supplement 1/3 of our power/heat and reduce waste disposal expenses. That could be financed for about $60/mo per house over 15 years, without government help.

A thought on how to better upgrade power and energy usage would be to use liquid hydrogen inside of the cables proposed in the section "Hang Superconducting Cables that Won’t Leak Electricity". This would cool the superconducting cables and also provide the needed transportation for hydrogen powered devices and fuel-cells. This would be harder to do due to the nature of hydrogen but would be well worth the investment. If you are already needing to transport hydrogen across the country you may as well cool some superconducting wires while you do it.

Snerdguy;
Conservation is good. Surplus is better. If the FocusFusion project I mentioned above succeeds, it won't pay to worry about wasting energy. Unlimited supply at ¼¢/kwh is pretty hard to beat even with the cheapest of conservation efforts.

All of these are great ideas but if you really want to change things then start beaming energy from one place to another -- we already do this on a much smaller scale every time you turn on your TV using a dish network receiver that is transmitted by microwaves.

http://www.cirurgia-plastica.com/otoplastia/

BC Hydro and Quebec Hydro are using (differently configured) copper-crawling robot, developed by Quebec Hydro.



June 2013: American Energy Independence

Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email

Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email

circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif
bmxmag-ps