Satellites currently must dodge an ever-growing gauntlet of other satellites and clouds of space debris, and this year the Pentagon has quietly upgraded its surveillance accordingly. The U.S. military announced yesterday that it now tracks 800 maneuverable satellites, compared to less than 100 prior to a February collision between an active U.S. satellite and a retired Russian communications satellite.
That crash served as a wakeup call and emphasized the vulnerability of U.S. satellites, according to General Kevin Chilton, commander of U.S. Strategic Command. Reuters reports that the Air Force also plans to track an additional 500 non-maneuvering satellites by the end of year, and thereby keep tabs on the roughly 1,300 active satellites currently in orbit.
A new UK study also predicts that close orbital encounters with space debris will continue to grow by 50 percent over the next decade, and by 250 percent over the next 50 years. It estimates that satellite handlers may have to make five times as many collision-avoidance moves in 2059, compared to 2019. This will add significantly to the cost of future space flight, the study warns.Even the space shuttle Discovery and the International Space Station have had to make course adjustments to dodge pieces of space junk in recent years. The need for better surveillance led the U.S. Air Force to team up with three major aerospace companies, in an effort to develop an electronic fence that can track any orbital object larger than two inches in width.
Solutions for cleaning up the space debris don't come easily. A French aerospace engineer of the European company EADS plans to test an orbital shroud that can pull defunct satellites down to a fiery death, and mad science agency DARPA also seeks proposals for clearing space debris out of orbit.
Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
Sounds like we need a system to remove retired or damaged satellites. Need something to shot at with those top secret high powered lasers? I think we have a winner! :)
While that might sound like a good idea you have a potential to turn one piece of space junk into hundreds of pieces of space junk.
Otta require all new satellites and rocket segments to have redundant deorbiting capability so even after being damaged it can throw itself away.
How about a space janitor in a rocket suit wielding a big butterfly net? :)
We should try and develope a missle program that works like harpons here. Instead of a missle that blows up it harpons the dead, or wonded space junk and throws it into a decaying orbit to burn up.
Or a super-tough rammer satellite that would crash into the debris and deflect it down into the atmosphere.
We Should just hire "Mega Maid"!lol She's gone from suck to blow. Yea we do need something to get rid of all the junk up there.
We need my picture.
OH SAVE US BARF AND LONE STARR
lol
What if the laser didn't blow up the satellites? What if all the laser did was gently "push" the satellite down in to a decaying orbit from a higher orbit? The force would come from the heat generated upon contact. It wouldn't be immediate, or fast, by any means. It might take years, and thousands of 'hits' over time, but would that work over time? Maybe it might work better on smaller pieces of junk than larger satellites, but even that would be a help. Just a thought.
Huge blocks of aerogel that sop up all the little pieces and readily fall into the atmosphere, due to their very large drag and light weight.