Fifty years ago last month, NASA opened its doors. The launch of Sputnik the year before had rattled the United States’ faith in its technological superiority and pushed it to assert itself as the leader in space. In the decades since, that dominance has scarcely been challenged. But as NASA phases out the space shuttle and International Space Station operations to transition into Constellation—the program that will use Orion spacecraft to return astronauts to the surface of the moon and, eventually, Mars—the country finds itself starting over at a time when other nations have announced their own lunar programs.
With critics questioning whether the benefits of manned spaceflight (both scientific and geopolitical) are worth the risk and cost, NASA faces serious challenges. It needs to transition quickly from the shuttle to Constellation, beat China and Russia to the moon, and do it without cannibalizing its non-manned programs. Here, in two parts, our timeline of the best-laid plans of the U.S., Russia, China and India.
For five years after the space shuttle retires in 2010, American astronauts will have to hitchhike their way into space. NASA plans to buy rides on Russia’s Soyuz for trips to the ISS, but diplomacy issues in the wake of Russia’s war with the republic of Georgia could preclude orbital carpooling.
In addition, NASA must balance the demands of its manned space program—which uses facilities strategically spread across a multitude of congressional districts—with the needs of the science community. Spacecraft like this year’s triumphant Phoenix Mars lander, not to mention the now-venerable Hubble Space Telescope, reveal the most universe for the money. Will NASA strip those programs to pay for Constellation?
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.
Check out the best of what's new here.
Why is the ESA completly left out of this?, they have a far larger budget for space programmes then China/India/Russia, an actual capability to get meaningful crews to Mars (the evolved ATV), China has not even done manual docking in space, the ATV did it automatically, a pre-requsite for Mars mission's, India has only sent one small probe to the Moon, and suddenly they are in the manned race to space?
I know PS has something of tech blindness toward's Europe, but it's getting ridiculous now.
Not only did the article ignore ESA, it ignored commercial spaceflight. What if the Google Lunar prize spurs a company to make it there before a government? What if Russia (or another country) buys Bigelow inflatable habitats instead of building a new space station on their own? True, it is difficult to predict how sucessful these commercial efforts will be or even if they will be sucessful at all, but if the point of the article is tension at NASA caused by competition, ignoring commercial competition is silly.
from clarkston, mi
You know all this money we are spending to bail out these people that signed contracts and now do not want to hold up their end. Forget them. Spend that 700B dollars on a trip to Mars, the moon, where ever. No it is not safe. Coming to America in 1492 was not safe. Some may die. Get over it. If we wait to cross all the t's and dot the i's we will never get anywhere. Seat belts, helmets, one third the cost of an auto is gov. compliance. Man is losing his ability to challenge the unknown, because someone says you cannot take that chance. Well it is my life to live or die the way I choose. If I choose to try for Mars and die. I went well. MAN up America, get a life.
Yes I know I can't spell. Oh well.