Weaving wool into Kevlar improves the energy and water absorption of the synthetic textile, potentially making bulletproof vests more comfortable and more affordable, according to researchers in Australia.
Tightly woven wool reduces the number of Kevlar layers required to stop a bullet from 36 to 30, and wool’s water-absorption qualities could make Kevlar more effective in wet situations. While Kevlar is used in ropes, wetsuits and other underwater applications, its bulletproof-ness is reduced by about 20 percent when it’s wet, so most Kevlar vests are waterproofed in a time-consuming process.
Wool would absorb some of the water and expand, strengthening the vest’s overall penetration resistance, researchers say.Rajiv Padhye, a textile technologist at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) in Melbourne, Australia, developed the new blend.
Kevlar has formed the basis of body armor used by military and police forces since the 1970s, but vests made with the polymer can be cumbersome and heavy. Chemists and textile scientists have designed some strong, lightweight alternatives, which include nanowire threads and shear-thickening liquids. But plain old wool would be a far cheaper and simpler option.
Padhye and colleagues at RMIT worked with a firm called Australian Defence Apparel, which provides gear to the Australian Defence Force, to develop and commercialize the new material. But the company was unimpressed at first — on a 25-layer prototype, bullets pierced the vest when it was wet, according to the Australian news site Cosmos Magazine.
Padhye said the prototypes have been strengthened after further testing.
Padhye said the wool-Kevlar blend meets international standards against handgun force, and he has applied for a patent, hoping to license the technology to military and police customers.
Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
Given the reduction in weight I don't see why they reduced the amount of layers from 36 - 30. If there is still a question of durability when wet why not test at 36 and scale back as the tests show it is feasible.
Why no just use one of the invented graphen/fulleren ultra flexible yet resistant sheets, which have been said like 3 years ago to replace kevlar in the near future? I mean, is there like a black hole for inventions?