“Propulsion,” the nine-year-old says as he leads his dad through the gates of the U.S. Space and Rocket Center in Huntsville, Alabama. “I just want to see the propulsion stuff.”
A young woman guides their group toward a full-scale replica of the massive Saturn V rocket that brought America to the moon. As they duck under the exhaust nozzles, Kenneth Wilson glances at his awestruck boy and feels his burden beginning to lighten. For a few minutes, at least, someone else will feed his son’s boundless appetite for knowledge.
Then Taylor raises his hand, not with a question but an answer. He knows what makes this thing, the biggest rocket ever launched, go up. And he wants—no, he obviously needs—to tell everyone about it, about how speed relates to exhaust velocity and dynamic mass, about payload ratios, about the pros and cons of liquid versus solid fuel. The tour guide takes a step back, yielding the floor to this slender kid with a deep-Arkansas drawl, pouring out a torrent of Ph.D.-level concepts as if there might not be enough seconds in the day to blurt it all out. The other adults take a step back too, perhaps jolted off balance by the incongruities of age and audacity, intelligence and exuberance.
As the guide runs off to fetch the center’s director—You gotta see this kid!—Kenneth feels the weight coming down on him again. What he doesn’t understand just yet is that he will come to look back on these days as the uncomplicated ones, when his scary-smart son was into simple things, like rocket science.
This is before Taylor would transform the family’s garage into a mysterious, glow-in-the-dark cache of rocks and metals and liquids with unimaginable powers. Before he would conceive, in a series of unlikely epiphanies, new ways to use neutrons to confront some of the biggest challenges of our time: cancer and nuclear terrorism. Before he would build a reactor that could hurl atoms together in a 500-million-degree plasma core—becoming, at 14, the youngest individual on Earth to achieve nuclear fusion.
When I meet Taylor Wilson, he is 16 and busy—far too busy, he says, to pursue a driver’s license. And so he rides shotgun as his father zigzags the family’s Land Rover up a steep trail in the Virginia Mountains north of Reno, Nevada, where they’ve come to prospect for uranium.
From the backseat, I can see Taylor’s gull-like profile, his forehead plunging from under his sandy blond bangs and continuing, in an almost unwavering line, along his prominent nose. His thinness gives him a wraithlike appearance, but when he’s lit up about something (as he is most waking moments), he does not seem frail. He has spent the past hour—the past few days, really—talking, analyzing, and breathlessly evangelizing about nuclear energy. We’ve gone back to the big bang and forward to mutually assured destruction and nuclear winter. In between are fission and fusion, Einstein and Oppenheimer, Chernobyl and Fukushima, matter and antimatter.
“Where does it come from?” Kenneth and his wife, Tiffany, have asked themselves many times. Kenneth is a Coca-Cola bottler, a skier, an ex-football player. Tiffany is a yoga instructor. “Neither of us knows a dang thing about science,” Kenneth says.
" Looking up, the neighbors watched as a small mushroom cloud rose, unsettlingly, over the Wilsons’ yard."Almost from the beginning, it was clear that the older of the Wilsons’ two sons would be a difficult child to keep on the ground. It started with his first, and most pedestrian, interest: construction. As a toddler in Texarkana, the family’s hometown, Taylor wanted nothing to do with toys. He played with real traffic cones, real barricades. At age four, he donned a fluorescent orange vest and hard hat and stood in front of the house, directing traffic. For his fifth birthday, he said, he wanted a crane. But when his parents brought him to a toy store, the boy saw it as an act of provocation. “No,” he yelled, stomping his foot. “I want a real one.”
This is about the time any other father might have put his own foot down. But Kenneth called a friend who owns a construction company, and on Taylor’s birthday a six-ton crane pulled up to the party. The kids sat on the operator’s lap and took turns at the controls, guiding the boom as it swung above the rooftops on Northern Hills Drive.
To the assembled parents, dressed in hard hats, the Wilsons’ parenting style must have appeared curiously indulgent. In a few years, as Taylor began to get into some supremely dangerous stuff, it would seem perilously laissez-faire. But their approach to child rearing is, in fact, uncommonly intentional. “We want to help our children figure out who they are,” Kenneth says, “and then do everything we can to help them nurture that.”
At 10, Taylor hung a periodic table of the elements in his room. Within a week he memorized all the atomic numbers, masses and melting points. At the family’s Thanksgiving gathering, the boy appeared wearing a monogrammed lab coat and armed with a handful of medical lancets. He announced that he’d be drawing blood from everyone, for “comparative genetic experiments” in the laboratory he had set up in his maternal grandmother’s garage. Each member of the extended family duly offered a finger to be pricked.
The next summer, Taylor invited everyone out to the backyard, where he dramatically held up a pill bottle packed with a mixture of sugar and stump remover (potassium nitrate) that he’d discovered in the garage. He set the bottle down and, with a showman’s flourish, ignited the fuse that poked out of the top. What happened next was not the firecracker’s bang
everyone expected, but a thunderous blast that brought panicked neighbors running from their houses. Looking up, they watched as a small mushroom cloud rose, unsettlingly, over the Wilsons’ yard.
For his 11th birthday, Taylor’s grandmother took him to Books-A-Million, where he picked out The Radioactive Boy Scout, by Ken Silverstein. The book told the disquieting tale of David Hahn, a Michigan teenager who, in the mid-1990s, attempted to build a breeder reactor in a backyard shed. Taylor was so excited by the book that he read much of it aloud: the boy raiding smoke detectors for radioactive americium . . . the cobbled-together reactor . . . the Superfund team in hazmat suits hauling away the family’s contaminated belongings. Kenneth and Tiffany heard Hahn’s story as a cautionary tale. But Taylor, who had recently taken a particular interest in the bottom two rows of the periodic table—the highly radioactive elements—read it as a challenge. “Know what?” he said. “The things that kid was trying to do, I’m pretty sure I can actually do them.”
Click here to view this article on a single page, or continue to page two below.

David Hahn had been bored too—and, like Taylor, smart enough to be dangerous. But here is where the two stories begin to diverge. When Hahn’s parents forbade his atomic endeavors, the angry teenager pressed on in secret. But Kenneth and Tiffany resisted their impulse to steer Taylor toward more benign pursuits. That can’t be easy when a child with a demonstrated talent and fondness for blowing things up proposes to dabble in nukes.
Kenneth and Tiffany agreed to let Taylor assemble a “survey of everyday radioactive materials” for his school’s science fair. Kenneth borrowed a Geiger counter from a friend at Texarkana’s emergency-management agency. Over the next few weekends, he and Tiffany shuttled Taylor around to nearby antique stores, where he pointed the clicking detector at old
radium-dial alarm clocks, thorium lantern mantles and uranium-glazed Fiesta plates. Taylor spent his allowance money on a radioactive dining set.
Drawn in by what he calls “the surprise properties” of radioactive materials, he wanted to know more. How can a speck of metal the size of a grain of salt put out such tremendous amounts of energy? Why do certain rocks expose film? Why does one isotope decay away in a millionth of a second while another has a half-life of two million years?
As Taylor began to wrap his head around the mind-blowing mysteries at the base of all matter, he could see that atoms, so small but potentially so powerful, offered a lifetime’s worth of secrets to unlock. Whereas Hahn’s resources had been limited, Taylor found that there was almost no end to the information he could find on the Internet, or to the oddities that he could purchase and store in the garage.
On top of tables crowded with chemicals and microscopes and germicidal black lights, an expanding array of nuclear fuel pellets, chunks of uranium and “pigs” (lead-lined containers) began to appear. When his parents pressed him about safety, Taylor responded in the convoluted jargon of inverse-square laws and distance intensities, time doses and roentgen submultiples. With his newfound command of these concepts, he assured them, he could master the furtive energy sneaking away from those rocks and metals and liquids—a strange and ever-multiplying cache that literally cast a glow into the corners of the garage.
Kenneth asked a nuclear-pharmacist friend to come over to check on Taylor’s safety practices. As far as he could tell, the friend said, the boy was getting it right. But he warned that radiation works in quick and complex ways. By the time Taylor learned from a mistake, it might be too late.
Lead pigs and glazed plates were only the beginning. Soon Taylor was getting into more esoteric “naughties”—radium quack cures, depleted uranium, radio-luminescent materials—and collecting mysterious machines, such as the mass spectrometer given to him by a former astronaut in Houston. As visions of Chernobyl haunted his parents, Taylor tried to reassure them. “I’m the responsible radioactive boy scout,” he told them. “I know what I’m doing.”
One afternoon, Tiffany ducked her head out of the door to the garage and spotted Taylor, in his canary yellow nuclear-technician’s coveralls, watching a pool of liquid spreading across the concrete floor. “Tay, it’s time for supper.”
“I think I’m going to have to clean this up first.”
“That’s not the stuff you said would kill us if it broke open, is it?”
“I don’t think so,” he said. “Not instantly.”
That summer, Kenneth’s daughter from a previous marriage, Ashlee, then a college student, came to live with the Wilsons. “The explosions in the backyard were getting to be a bit much,” she told me, shortly before my own visit to the family’s home. “I could see everyone getting frustrated. They’d say something and Taylor would argue back, and his argument would be legitimate. He knows how to out-think you. I was saying, ‘You guys need to be parents. He’s ruling the roost.’ ”
“What she didn’t understand,” Kenneth says, “is that we didn’t have a choice. Taylor doesn’t understand the meaning of ‘can’t.’ ”
“And when he does,” Tiffany adds, “he doesn’t listen.”
“Looking back, I can see that,” Ashlee concedes. “I mean, you can tell Taylor that the world doesn’t revolve around him. But he doesn’t really get that. He’s not being selfish, it’s just that there’s so much going on in his head.”
Tiffany, for her part, could have done with less drama. She had just lost her sister, her only sibling. And her mother’s cancer had recently come out of remission. “Those were some tough times,” Taylor tells me one day, as he uses his mom’s gardening trowel to mix up a batch of yellowcake (the partially processed uranium that’s the stuff of WMD infamy) in a five-gallon bucket. “But as bad as it was with Grandma dying and all, that urine sure was something.”
Taylor looks sheepish. He knows this is weird. “After her PET scan she let me have a sample. It was so hot I had to keep it in a lead pig.
“The other thing is . . .” He pauses, unsure whether to continue but, being Taylor, unable to stop himself. “She had lung cancer, and she’d cough up little bits of tumor for me to dissect. Some people might think that’s gross, but I found it scientifically very interesting.”
What no one understood, at least not at first, was that as his grandmother was withering, Taylor was growing, moving beyond mere self-centeredness. The world that he saw revolving around him, the boy was coming to believe, was one that he could actually change.
The problem, as he saw it, is that isotopes for diagnosing and treating cancer are extremely short-lived. They need to be, so they can get in and kill the targeted tumors and then decay away quickly, sparing healthy cells. Delivering them safely and on time requires expensive handling—including, often, delivery by private jet. But what if there were a way to make those medical isotopes at or near the patients? How many more people could they reach, and how much earlier could they reach them? How many more people like his grandmother could be saved?
“He told me he wanted to build the reactor in his garage, and I thought, ‘Oh my lord, we can’t let him do that.’ ”As Taylor stirred the toxic urine sample, holding the clicking Geiger counter over it, inspiration took hold. He peered into the swirling yellow center, and the answer shone up at him, bright as the sun. In fact, it was the sun—or, more precisely, nuclear fusion, the process (defined by Einstein as E=mc2) that powers the sun. By harnessing fusion—the moment when atomic nuclei collide and fuse together, releasing energy in the process—Taylor could produce the high-energy neutrons he would need to irradiate materials for medical isotopes. Instead of creating those isotopes in multimillion-dollar cyclotrons and then rushing them to patients, what if he could build a fusion reactor small enough, cheap enough and safe enough to produce isotopes as needed, in every hospital in the world?
At that point, only 10 individuals had managed to build working fusion reactors. Taylor contacted one of them, Carl Willis, then a 26-year-old Ph.D. candidate living in Albuquerque, and the two hit it off. But Willis, like the other successful fusioneers, had an advanced degree and access to a high-tech lab and precision equipment. How could a middle-school kid living on the Texas/Arkansas border ever hope to make his own star?

On the family’s first trip to Reno, even before Taylor and Joey were accepted to the academy, Taylor made an appointment with Friedwardt Winterberg, a celebrated physicist at the University of Nevada who had studied under the Nobel Prize–winning quantum theorist Werner Heisenberg. When Taylor told Winterberg that he wanted to build a fusion reactor, also called a fusor, the notoriously cranky professor erupted: “You’re 13 years old! And you want to play with tens of thousands of electron volts and deadly x-rays?” Such a project would be far too technically challenging and hazardous, Winterberg insisted, even for most doctoral candidates. “First you must master calculus, the language of science,” he boomed. “After that,” Tiffany said, “we didn’t think it would go anywhere. Kenneth and I were a bit relieved.”
But Taylor still hadn’t learned the word “can’t.” In the fall, when he began at Davidson, he found the two advocates he needed, one in the office right next door to Winterberg’s. “He had a depth of understanding I’d never seen in someone that young,” says atomic physicist Ronald Phaneuf. “But he was telling me he wanted to build the reactor in his garage, and I’m thinking, ‘Oh my lord, we can’t let him do that.’ But maybe we can help him try to do it here.”
Phaneuf invited Taylor to sit in on his upper-division nuclear physics class and introduced him to technician Bill Brinsmead. Brinsmead, a Burning Man devotee who often rides a wheeled replica of the Little Boy bomb through the desert, was at first reluctant to get involved in this 13-year-old’s project. But as he and Phaneuf showed Taylor around the department’s equipment room, Brinsmead recalled his own boyhood, when he was bored and unchallenged and aching to build something really cool and difficult (like a laser, which he eventually did build) but dissuaded by most of the adults who might have helped.
Rummaging through storerooms crowded with a geeky abundance of electron microscopes and instrumentation modules, they came across a high-vacuum chamber made of thick-walled stainless steel, capable of withstanding extreme heat and negative pressure. “Think I could use that for my fusor?” Taylor asked Brinsmead. “I can’t think of a more worthy cause,” Brinsmead said.
Now it’s Tiffany who drives, along a dirt road that wends across a vast, open mesa a few miles south of the runways shared by Albuquerque’s airport and Kirkland Air Force Base. Taylor has convinced her to bring him to New Mexico to spend a week with Carl Willis, whom Taylor describes as “my best nuke friend.” Cocking my ear toward the backseat, I catch snippets of Taylor and Willis’s conversation.
“The idea is to make a gamma-ray laser from stimulated decay of dipositronium.”
“I’m thinking about building a portable, beam-on-target neutron source.”
“Need some deuterated polyethylene?”
Willis is now 30; tall and thin and much quieter than Taylor. When he’s interested in something, his face opens up with a blend of amusement and curiosity. When he’s uninterested, he slips into the far-off distractedness that’s common among the super-smart. Taylor and Willis like to get together a few times a year for what they call “nuclear tourism”—they visit research facilities, prospect for uranium, or run experiments.
Earlier in the week, we prospected for uranium in the desert and shopped for secondhand laboratory equipment in Los Alamos. The next day, we wandered through Bayo Canyon, where Manhattan Project engineers set off some of the largest dirty bombs in history in the course of perfecting Fat Man, which leveled Nagasaki.
Today we’re searching for remnants of a “broken arrow,” military lingo for a lost nuclear weapon. While researching declassified military reports, Taylor discovered that a Mark 17 “Peacemaker” hydrogen bomb, which was designed to be 700 times as powerful as the bomb detonated over Hiroshima, was accidentally dropped onto this mesa in May 1957. For the U.S. military, it was an embarrassingly Strangelovian episode; the airman in the bomb bay narrowly avoided his own Slim Pickens moment when the bomb dropped from its gantry and smashed the B-36’s doors open. Although its plutonium core hadn’t been inserted, the bomb’s “spark plug” of conventional explosives and radioactive material detonated on impact, creating a fireball and a massive crater. A grazing steer was the only reported casualty.
Tiffany parks the rented SUV among the mesquite, and we unload metal detectors and Geiger counters and fan out across the field. “This,” says Tiffany, smiling as she follows her son across the scrubland, “is how we spend our vacations.”

Willis says that when Taylor first contacted him, he was struck by the 12-year-old’s focus and forwardness—and by the fact that he couldn’t plumb the depth of Taylor’s knowledge with a few difficult technical questions. After checking with Kenneth, Willis sent Taylor some papers on fusion reactors. Then Taylor began acquiring pieces for his new machine.
Through his first year at Davidson, Taylor spent his afternoons in a corner of Phaneuf’s lab that the professor had cleared out for him, designing the reactor, overcoming tricky technical issues, tracking down critical parts. Phaneuf helped him find a surplus high-voltage insulator at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Willis, then working at a company that builds particle accelerators, talked his boss into parting with an extremely expensive high-voltage power supply.
With Brinsmead and Phaneuf’s help, Taylor stretched himself, applying knowledge from more than 20 technical fields, including nuclear and plasma physics, chemistry, radiation metrology and electrical engineering. Slowly he began to test-assemble the reactor, troubleshooting pesky vacuum leaks, electrical problems and an intermittent plasma field.
Shortly after his 14th birthday, Taylor and Brinsmead loaded deuterium fuel into the machine, brought up the power, and confirmed the presence of neutrons. With that, Taylor became the 32nd individual on the planet to achieve a nuclear-fusion reaction. Yet what would set Taylor apart from the others was not the machine itself but what he decided to do with it.
While still developing his medical isotope application, Taylor came across a report about how the thousands of shipping containers entering the country daily had become the nation’s most vulnerable “soft belly,” the easiest entry point for weapons of mass destruction. Lying in bed one night, he hit on an idea: Why not use a fusion reactor to produce weapons-sniffing neutrons that could scan the contents of containers as they passed through ports? Over the next few weeks, he devised a concept for a drive-through device that would use a small reactor to bombard passing containers with neutrons. If weapons were inside, the neutrons would force the atoms into fission, emitting gamma radiation (in the case of nuclear material) or nitrogen (in the case of conventional explosives). A detector, mounted opposite, would pick up the signature and alert the operator.
He entered the reactor, and the design for his bomb-sniffing application, into the Intel International Science and Engineering Fair. The Super Bowl of pre-college science events, the fair attracts 1,500 of the world’s most switched-on kids from some 50 countries. When Intel CEO Paul Otellini heard the buzz that a 14-year-old had built a working nuclear-fusion reactor, he went straight for Taylor’s exhibit. After a 20-minute conversation, Otellini was seen walking away, smiling and shaking his head in what looked like disbelief. Later, I would ask him what he was thinking. “All I could think was, ‘I am so glad that kid is on our side.’ ”
For the past three years, Taylor has dominated the international science fair, walking away with nine awards (including first place overall), overseas trips and more than $100,000 in prizes. After the Department of Homeland Security learned of Taylor’s design, he traveled to Washington for a meeting with the DHS’s Domestic Nuclear Detection Office, which invited Taylor to submit a grant proposal to develop the detector. Taylor also met with then–Under Secretary of Energy Kristina Johnson, who says the encounter left her “stunned.”
“I would say someone like him comes along maybe once in a generation,” Johnson says. “He’s not just smart; he’s cool and articulate. I think he may be the most amazing kid I’ve ever met.”
And yet Taylor’s story began much like David Hahn’s, with a brilliant, high-flying child hatching a crazy plan to build a nuclear reactor. Why did one journey end with hazmat teams and an eventual arrest, while the other continues to produce an array of prizes, patents, television appearances, and offers from college recruiters?
The answer is, mostly, support. Hahn, determined to achieve something extraordinary but discouraged by the adults in his life, pressed on without guidance or oversight—and with nearly catastrophic results. Taylor, just as determined but socially gifted, managed to gather into his orbit people who could help him achieve his dreams: the physics professor; the older nuclear prodigy; the eccentric technician; the entrepreneur couple who, instead of retiring, founded a school to nurture genius kids. There were several more, but none so significant as Tiffany and Kenneth, the parents who overcame their reflexive—and undeniably sensible—inclinations to keep their Icarus-like son on the ground. Instead they gave him the wings he sought and encouraged him to fly up to the sun and beyond, high enough to capture a star of his own.
After about an hour of searching across the mesa, our detectors begin to beep. We find bits of charred white plastic and chunks of aluminum—one of which is slightly radioactive. They are remnants of the lost hydrogen bomb. I uncover a broken flange with screws still attached, and Taylor digs up a hunk of lead. “Got a nice shard here,” Taylor yells, finding a gnarled piece of metal. He scans it with his detector. “Unfortunately, it’s not radioactive.”
“That’s the kind I like,” Tiffany says.
"We’ve got about 60 pounds of uranium, bomb fragments and radioactive shards. This thing would make a real good dirty bomb.”Willis picks up a large chunk of the bomb’s outer casing, still painted dull green, and calls Taylor over. “Wow, look at that warp profile!” Taylor says, easing his scintillation detector up to it. The instrument roars its approval. Willis, seeing Taylor ogling the treasure, presents it to him. Taylor is ecstatic. “It’s a field of dreams!” he yells. “This place is loaded!”
Suddenly we’re finding radioactive debris under the surface every five or six feet—even though the military claimed that the site was completely cleaned up. Taylor gets down on his hands and knees, digging, laughing, calling out his discoveries. Tiffany checks her watch. “Tay, we really gotta go or we’ll miss our flight.”
“I’m not even close to being done!” he says, still digging. “This is the best day of my life!” By the time we manage to get Taylor into the car, we’re running seriously late. “Tay,” Tiffany says, “what are we going to do with all this stuff?”
“For $50, you can check it on as excess baggage,” Willis says. “You don’t label it, nobody knows what it is, and it won’t hurt anybody.” A few minutes later, we’re taping an all-too-flimsy box shut and loading it into the trunk. “Let’s see, we’ve got about 60 pounds of uranium, bomb fragments and radioactive shards,” Taylor says. “This thing would make a real good dirty bomb.”
In truth, the radiation levels are low enough that, without prolonged close-range exposure, the cargo poses little danger. Still, we stifle the jokes as we pull up to curbside check-in. “Think it will get through security?” Tiffany asks Taylor.
“There are no radiation detectors in airports,” Taylor says. “Except for one pilot project, and I can’t tell you which airport that’s at.”
As the skycap weighs the box, I scan the “prohibited items” sign. You can’t take paints, flammable materials or water on a commercial airplane. But sure enough, radioactive materials are not listed.
We land in Reno and make our way toward the baggage claim. “I hope that box held up,” Taylor says, as we approach the carousel. “And if it didn’t, I hope they give us back the radioactive goodies scattered all over the airplane.” Soon the box appears, adorned with a bright strip of tape and a note inside explaining that the package has been opened and inspected by the TSA. “They had no idea,” Taylor says, smiling, “what they were looking at.”
Apart from the fingerprint scanners at the door, Davidson Academy looks a lot like a typical high school. It’s only when the students open their mouths that you realize that this is an exceptional place, a sort of Hogwarts for brainiacs. As these math whizzes, musical prodigies and chess masters pass in the hallway, the banter flies in witty bursts. Inside humanities classes, discussions spin into intellectual duels.
Although everyone has some kind of advanced obsession, there’s no question that Taylor is a celebrity at the school, where the lobby walls are hung with framed newspaper clippings of his accomplishments. Taylor and I visit with the principal, the school’s founders and a few of Taylor’s friends. Then, after his calculus class, we head over to the university’s physics department, where we meet Phaneuf and Brinsmead.
Taylor’s reactor, adorned with yellow radiation-warning signs, dominates the far corner of Phaneuf’s lab. It looks elegant—a gleaming stainless-steel and glass chamber on top of a cylindrical trunk, connected to an array of sensors and feeder tubes. Peering through the small window into the reaction chamber, I can see the golf-ball-size grid of tungsten fingers that will cradle the plasma, the state of matter in which unbound electrons, ions and photons mix freely with atoms and molecules.
“OK, y’all stand back,” Taylor says. We retreat behind a wall of leaden blocks as he shakes the hair out of his eyes and flips a switch. He turns a knob to bring the voltage up and adds in some gas. “This is exactly how me and Bill did it the first time,” he says. “But now we’ve got it running even better.”
Through a video monitor, I watch the tungsten wires beginning to glow, then brightening to a vivid orange. A blue cloud of plasma appears, rising and hovering, ghostlike, in the center of the reaction chamber. “When the wires disappear,” Phaneuf says, “that’s when you know you have a lethal radiation field.”
I watch the monitor while Taylor concentrates on the controls and gauges, especially the neutron detector they’ve dubbed Snoopy. “I’ve got it up to 25,000 volts now,” Taylor says. “I’m going to out-gas it a little and push it up.”
Willis’s power supply crackles. The reactor is entering “star mode.” Rays of plasma dart between gaps in the now-invisible grid as deuterium atoms, accelerated by the tremendous voltages, begin to collide. Brinsmead keeps his eyes glued to the neutron detector. “We’re getting neutrons,” he shouts. “It’s really jamming!”
Taylor cranks it up to 40,000 volts. “Whoa, look at Snoopy now!” Phaneuf says, grinning. Taylor nudges the power up to 50,000 volts, bringing the temperature of the plasma inside the core to an incomprehensible 580 million degrees—some 40 times as hot as the core of the sun. Brinsmead lets out a whoop as the neutron gauge tops out.
“Snoopy’s pegged!” he yells, doing a little dance. On the video screen, purple sparks fly away from the plasma cloud, illuminating the wonder in the faces of Phaneuf and Brinsmead, who stand in a half-orbit around Taylor. In the glow of the boy’s creation, the men suddenly look years younger.
Taylor keeps his thin fingers on the dial as the atoms collide and fuse and throw off their energy, and the men take a step back, shaking their heads and wearing ear-to-ear grins.
“There it is,” Taylor says, his eyes locked on the machine. “The birth of a star.”
Tom Clynes is a contributing editor at Popular Science.
Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
Holy crap. That is some scary genius kid!
Good parenting + genius kid = good stuff
nice story, loved reading it!
Yes, very smart indeed, and a very interesting read. But I'm not sure that it fits my personal definition of good parenting. For all we know, it was dumb luck that the kid didn't blow himself and his family up at age 10, after which he never would have gone on to do anything meaningful. At that kind of young age, most kids have a hard time distinguishing between what CAN be done and what SHOULD be done. All the power with little control. All the knowledge with little experience to transform it into wisdom.
Don't get me wrong, I love it when kids are really smart. And I am really happy that he has loving and supportive parents. But if the kid had unintentionally blown up the neighborhood or irradiated an area, or hurt/killed someone, then I think we'd all be singing a different tune: "Where was the parental supervision? They shouldn't let him do that kind of dangerous stuff without proper guidance. Etc."
We seem to be drawing our conclusions about the quality of the upbringing by the current result (a smart kid who hasn't killed anyone in his wild experiments). Shouldn't we draw our conclusions based on the methods instead of the result? The results could have very easily been (and still could be, in the future) different.
With great power comes great responsibility.
I would say marcoreid, that while your concerns about parenting are okay on the surface (with most kids) -- in this case I'm sure Taylor explained very clearly (to his parent's satisfaction) that what he was doing was safe. He certainly wasn't planning to jeopardize his own life, let alone others. Plus, the father brought in an expert to validate the safety measures.
So sounds to me like the parenting was perfect, and put encouragement on the top of their parenting duties.
The world is (and will be) a better place for it. Thanks in advance Taylor, we'll be watching you for decades to come.
Imagine how his brother must feel...
We would see more children like this if our schools where more hands on and interactive rather then "sit in the seat and pay attention".
Kids need to see what there learning in action to really understand it and remember it.
Good science-fiction Mr Clynes
I take back my words, I did some research that Taylor wilson seem to exist for real. Found is homepage and in wikipedia.
I hope this next generation is more open-minded and make the difference, guiding mankind towards space, the final frontier.
the only way forward is nuclear spaceships. imagine enough power to operate a 500 year mission, even a thousand year mission. still this kid can figure out the future of propulsion but he hasnt solved space survival. We loose muscle and bone mass, embryos develop weirdly. gotta get some sort of gravity on those ships. Concetrate on that and then propulsion
This child is an example of why the United States must develop the greatest information infrastructure in the world immediately. We cannot afford to waste any more time worrying about financial limitations. Untold wealth and progress that dwarf our current economic woes is at hand. We must seize the future now. The greatest teachers in the world should be accessible to all Americans via the finest internet in the world. There are probably many more undiscovered children with enormous potential in our midst right now. If we act boldly, boundless prosperity is our sure reward. We must set aside the fear of poverty that has taken over the consciousness of our nation. Leaders with vision and courage must come forward.
"Eerie Scary Genius Kid!"
Amazing and startling the toys he plays with!
.............................
Science sees no further than what it can sense.
Religion sees beyond the senses.
This kid is what the world needs. But, you don't need complicated fusion to detect radioactive materials onboard ships. Just need americium ((not telling where to find it) and Beryllium (not telling where and how to get it and it is extremely poisonous) also you need more things that I will not tell you about plus millions of dollars in tech money. Great article enjoyed reading it. It would be cool to be the 32nd person to generate fusion. Am I right about that. By the way, only fifteen.
I actually teared up reading this article. Its so similar to my life- except I was not allowed to follow those aspirations. I was banned from showing my project in 3rd grade at the science fair, and ever since then I was on my own. At the age of 6 my best friend in the world worked at Fermi labs, and we would discuss cold fusion while playing chess. My mothers basement was my lab, and it grew much like what is in this article. While this kid got help from astronauts etc etc, I was persecuted for chasing my dreams, being forced to stop.
When my dreams died, so did my grades. I found school to be boring and idiotic. Some of us, not all, do not belong in a normal scholastic program. My parents refused to let me skip grades even after my teachers and principals told them of my capabilities. 176 IQ at age 6, after proving the tests, I no longer could take official IQ tests because I have seen all the official psychiatric PhD authorized/approved questions. I no longer could take those tests, I have no idea how much higher it got.
Funny, that spelling and grammar were my only downfall, and till this day I have problems with both. But science and technology were never a problem. I passed Jr. High and High School through osmosis, never studying, heck, I slept in every class. When home I would conduct science experiments. My GPA in high school was 1.6, and I didn't care. I think its important you take this seriously, especially if you are a parent of a genius, or a teacher, etc etc. Once I got to college I had a 4.0, dropping to a 3.9 because my philosophy teacher didn't like my capitalistic views, and refused to conform to his socialistic/communistic views.
MOST of the trouble makers in school were extremely smart. Maybe as high as 8/10 of them. They may not show it, they may not look it, but they are. it was apparent that most people who were gifted, were gifted in ONE area - and may be completely ... well... idiotic in others. Idiot-Sevant, yeah, its real and a lot more common than mainstream society could possibly understand.
Don't get me wrong, I am not saying its stupid to teach poetry, or Shakespeare, but for some people it is not a good match. Of course being well rounded is important - but our society is so focused on these "building blocks" of knowledge, that they are not equipped to work with genius. Some were geniuses in music, or writing. Some were geniuses in science, and technology, some were gifted at mechanical engineering. But getting bad grades in these "forced" classes could impact ones ability to get noticed. My 1.6 GPA in high school nearly didn't get me into college, but my 32 ACT and 176IQ saved me. If I was allowed to focus my learning earlier in life I would have been much better off, and so would many others. I have to admit I learned a lot while I was in high school, just not while I was in class. I learned more at home through auto-dictation, and I know I am not alone! This is very common. This kid is a perfect example of that.
Our school systems only help those who can be good at everything, but those who are gifted in one area should nurture that talent. But even when, on rare occasion people nurture their genius - where does all that talent go? All too often these people are paid large sums of money to work for financial institutions on Wall Street. They attract the most amount of talent because they offer the largest paychecks. Capitalism is the only model I want to live under, so that the more you work, the more you can earn... it promotes people to work harder and smarter. But when the best and brightest are busy making millionaires into billionaires, there is a "braid drain" as I call it.
We need our geniuses to work in fields of science and medicine, but more often than not, they do not. Just think how advanced our government would be if we had the best and brightest running our country for instance. Who runs for government then? professional politicians. And when they reach their office, lets say of president, who advises them? Its a popularity game, we are not picking the best and brightest. Think of it this way, have you ever been at the voting booth and wondered, how is it that out of 300 MILLION americans, how is it down to this group of people? And you can apply that rational to every management position. A CEO today is a shmoozer, a golf player, a playboy - a charismatic deal maker, but how much would companies benefit from a true leader running the "joint".
Forget about who the CEO is, who is on the board? Who is managing your department where YOU work? Usually its not the best candidate. Its human nature. And we keep repeating it over and over.
This kid is a great example. If we had people with his intelligence making strategic decisions rather than a career politician our entire nation, the world in fact, would be a better place.
In closing, I am sure some people would think I have a chip on my shoulder, mostly because I am horrible at writing. But I don't. I am hoping that people become just a little bit more aware of how genius is wasted in our country, and in fact, the whole world. Being born into leadership in a monarchy is a great example of an idiotic way of choosing leadership. As if good decision making is passed through DNA? Obviously not. Just imagine how history could have been different if the best and brightest ran the world, or the company you work at. Even if they have no social skills, have horrible penmanship, wear a pocket protector, or don't wear the latest fashion.
Well, since I wrote this over 6 hours in small 2 minute sessions while watching my 2 year old, and since I didn't even proof-read it, its probably all over the place... for a guy who is horrible at written communication I probably should just erase it, but NAH, I think I will just hit submit comment! LOL. Whatever, hope it made sense.
I read about this kid on another news site before. The kid is an absolute genius. WHen I saw the part about him not worring about a drivers license, I immediately though we have a real life Sheldon Cooper on our hands! I am going to raise my son to explore the world around him and never stop asking questions. I can't wait until he is older to start doing this with him. He's only 20 months old and is already learning how to do things on his own. He gets frusterated if he can't do it, but doesn't want others to do it for him. I myself am always trying to learn new things as well. I constantly try to imagine how things works. I just won't accept "they work because they simply do." I need to know how they work. I originally went to college for astronautical engineering. I knew I wanted to be one of the people to put others on Mars and knew I could do it. Unfortunately, even though the sciences come easy to me, math didn't. I knew it would be challenging but there were levels of math I didn't even know existed. I ended up changing to international politics. I now ask if I should have gone to my second choice school for earth and atmospheric science.
Science always asks "can we," but doesn't seem to ask "should we."
@captainjman
WOW! You hit the nail on the head! I went to see a psychologist and he had me take an IQ test when I was 11, because my Mom and my teacher thought I might have ADD. I scored a 125 and was was considered "bright", but I didn't have ADD. The psychologist had told my Mom that I wasn't interested in the course work at school, and of course he was right! I was to busy being the fat kid in class and being bullied tends to take a lot of time outta your scheduled "study" time. To make this long story a little shorter the psychologist had told my Mom to try and get me into advanced classes, but the school wouldn't hear of it, and we didn't have the money at the time to pursue a privately funded school. So basically I was SOL...
Easily the best read I have EVER had on popsci!
Great article.
captainjman,
At what age do you stop blaming the world for your limitations and take responsibility for your own choices?
It is your ability to clearly reflect upon your life and identify its problems, the responsibility of change falls back to you.
It is time to grow up and go out into the world and do something, anything productive rather than arguing and rationalizing sitting on your ass and it's not your fault.
And why must a genius pursue science or mathematics? Why can't you just go out into the world and do something you enjoy, make enough money to take care of yourself and eventually a family. Science and mathematics is not the holy grail of life and the only direction for a genius. I read your words and I read an old guy feeling sorry for yourself and argue really well towards his own laziness.
Get off your butt and go into the world. One day you will be old and then die and all of life will pass you by.
.............................
Science sees no further than what it can sense.
Religion sees beyond the senses.
The heck with "should be done ". Just go for it, that 's what brooms are for.
Real life version of Sheldon Cooper ?!
Way to go kid.
I'd like to know how far away we (the human race) are from fusion reactors that are sustainable once powered up (their output is much greater than the total power that must be input to keep them going).
I hope he doesn't regularly wear his hazard gear at the dining table, or this genius family will all be dying young of cancer.
@CosmicJoker42
About 5 years after we have a reliable supply of He3.
Wow, just wow. Absolutely beautiful story. Thank you.
in 3 years he will start his company, Mr. Fusion !
I'll keep waiting...
It's sad really how the school system holds kids back. When I was 3 I learned Multiplication and Division and was very fast at it. Even today I can do complex equations in my head. I have had many ideas and concepts in my life but have never been allowed to achieve as I was stuffed down and pushed to not excel, but to recede to the level of my fellow students. I have never believed in the school system for one reason. That reason is that they use one method to teach everyone, they destroy creativity and free thinking as it is easier to control someone who is thought for instead an independent thinker. I loved school at one time also. Then I got into kindergarten and my first day I asked when we would do these things and she said third grade and to wait until then to do that. I am in no way some super genius, but who knows. Now, I have no real inspiration to excel at anything until I am out of the school system because every time I have I have been pushed to digress and think within the box. How sad it is that kids are forced to go to a place that destroys spirits, inspiration, and thinking.
@TruthIsMyName, @captainjman, @chemboy458
First, who reads an article this amazing and then proceeds to leave comments about how smart they are and how deprived and suffocated they are?
Second, I have two good friends who grew up on Wallace and 58th in Chicago and one friend from Bales ave and 30th in KC. Although all three grew up in some of the worst neighborhoods in the states they still managed to succeed. One attained his doctorate in astrophysics from UC Berkely, one just finished up his residency as a psychiatrist, and the other has his PE stamp for mechanical engineering. I promise you that all three had harder lives growing up than any of you did... since apparently you are 15 and have access to a computer. Please for the love of god quit placing blame and start taking responsibility. Saying you don't have an environment conducive to self exploration is extremely insulting for alot of people. Also, your lack of humility is nauseating.
Best article ever written on this site. Might be the best I've ever read. Good work popsci and Great work Taylor Wilson. I foresee you really making a positive impact on the world. Much love.
The author writes:
Earlier in the week, we prospected for uranium in the desert and shopped for secondhand laboratory equipment in Los Alamos. The next day, we wandered through Bayo Canyon, where Manhattan Project engineers set off some of the largest dirty bombs in history in the course of perfecting Fat Man, which leveled Nagasaki.
Unless the author is using the term "dirty bomb" in its current less than nuclear detonation definition, he exaggerates. I do not think that the historical record demonstrates that the engineers of the Manhattan Project set off, from what I infer the author intended, too many "... of the largest dirty bombs in history in the course of perfecting Fat Man...."
He Reminds me of the title character of Orson Scott Card's science fiction novel "Ender's Game". I bet Taylor Wilson could come up with fusion that could provide energy to the entire planet forever. Who would control it? No one controls a star.
I would like to congratulate Taylor Wilson for his achievement. I am also highly impressed with his parents for their efforts. The 6-ton crane was the second account in this article that highly impressed me.
I have often wondered what would happen if someone were to mine their own uranium. I've read it is a controlled substance in this country. Then, there is the 1998 "Harper's Magazine" account of "The Radioactive Boy Scout," relating how the efforts of a teenager to build a breeder reactor resulted in a government team swarming his home and removing radioactive materials.
@captainjman, IQ doesn't go up with age; it goes down. The tests are a measure of the ratio of what an average person of your age knows (or can reason), compared to what you know. As human knowledge is finite, no matter how smart you are, the test scale peaks. As you get older, you may slide up that scale of what you know relative all human knowledge, but so does everyone else. In fact, most people aren't able to process their world fully until they reach adulthood. So, if you can, at least partly, achieve adult-like intelligence as a child, the tests assign you a higher score, but you would look far less impressive by the time you reach age 21. This is the reason that my high school's Gifted and Talented program urged me to take an IQ exam as soon as possible. I was 17 by that point. It's considered bad manners to tell your IQ. Mine usually comes back as 132, just barely into Mensa territory.
Parenting is always a challenge, but guiding someone who has comprehension beyond one's own is particularly difficult. In my early teens, when I talked about the things that excited me, such as ion engines and nuclear rockets, people often said they had no idea what I was talking about, and several criticized my mom and me for letting me ramble on such wild ideas. This was in the late '70s, and my books were from the '60s and '50s. Many things changed after I got into the Albuquerque Public School system, one of them being that I found smarter people than me who were my age at the Career Enrichment Center. That, at least, gave me some sense of proportion of my place in the world.
Taylor, Rip off the rear-view mirror because all of those people chasing you and telling you "can't" are not there to help you.
Perhaps we can all figure out how to keep society from retarding people like Taylor. It could be our best contribution to the invention of the Warp Drive! ;-]
Bob Root
CTO
Keys Care
@captainjman Incidentally, the politicians are not the only people who run the country. Bureaucrats actually administer much of the government's functions, and make the rules that have the force of law under which we must operate. Congress makes a law, which a bureaucratic agency interprets and writes rules, and then we have to follow the rules made by the agency as if they were laws. Many of our top bureaucrats are highly intelligent.
Extremely intelligent people can be bad leaders, too, at least as often as not-so intelligent people. Intelligence is not the same thing as wisdom or leadership.
Taylor sounds a very creative guy and I hope he continues to receive support from his ad hoc team.
Sadly he is entering a USA that pretends to care about invention and creativity and then corrupts the patent system to benefit large corporations and Wall Street Banks. Right now the taxes levied on inventors have doubled and Taylor if he tries to patent more then four ideas will find himself being taxed at the full rate. Thanks be to unlimited lobby dollars and a sellout congress and president who together gave us the America Invents Act of 2011. Special thanks to the California Congressional Democratic Delegation who mostly with a few good Republicans- yes there are a couple left (of Genghis Khan) all voted against this abominable bill.
As to the article- many Kudos for it was an article to show how support for bright people with more then normal insight can be socially acceptable.
My minor negatives revolve around trying to paint Taylor as special for having built a Farnsworth (invented TV) Fusor (note the author fails to identify it as such but that is what all Fusors are), implying that there is something special about making neutrons from a hot plasma etc. As far as I know the Fusor has been around for more then 50 years and god only knows how many have been built and run.
Furthermore there are many other neutron sources using tritium targets or beryllium targets, most are extremely cheap and very compact. Indeed some of these other types of sources have been put forward in years following 9/11/01 to DHS by LBNL and other researchers to be used on a basis similar to that proposed by Taylor to inspect shipping.
The latter takes nothing away from Taylor on the contrary it shows just how spot on his thinking and insights are.
Taylor had a specific use for his neutron source and that is what is exciting (although again not novel) that he is thinking about creating short lived isotopes on site with cheap high energy neutrons.
Taylor may well have hit on a novel way to make local isotopes but this aspect of the story was not developed leading us to believe that it was a dead end, or a poorly constructed story ending.
Congratulations, keep going strong…
The question was raised about when we will see net energy gain from fusion.
The people at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory www.llnl.gov predict it will be this year!
It is normally called ignition when the energy given off by the fusion triggers the fusion of much if not all of the remaining fuel (hydrogen). The end result will be piped directly into the floors of Congress where it is expected to raise the tone of discourse considerably!
Fused H makes He.
I posted a comment in good faith and it came up flagged as spam - and I lost the script-who can I complain to?
This reads a little like a sci-fi short story or a script for a movie. The only thing left out is the government agents that come to take him away to some lab... to isolate his genius and potential.
Also, the article speaks to how people of the calibre come along every generation. I would have to disagree. People like this young man only come around once ever century.
Redoubt you need to recalibrate, there are probably 5 to 10 thousand American kids of this creative calibre alive today and ten times that number world wide (or more).
Unfortunately most will be repressed, ripped off or restrained.
They come in all colors and climes, from caring folk who are enlightened like Taylor's folks to drug addicts that are blind and insensitive to their children.
A well written story. I'm really amazed at Taylor's talents and glad that there are people in his circle helping him along to do greater things. I also hope he stays in control of his own life and follows his own pursuits to do good things. This month's mag has some really fascinating people in it.
It's all fun and games until he and his entire family dies of radiation induced cancer in about a decade.
The title: ...FUSION.... Did they ever explain his method or how he did achieve fusion... seems a bit beyond a young man of that age, without the help of someone experienced in at least providing materials, etc. "Before he would build a reactor that could hurl atoms together in a 500-million-degree plasma core—becoming, at 14, the youngest individual on Earth to achieve nuclear fusion." huh... show us the 500 million degree plasma core? MUCH LEFT OUT IN THIS ARTICLE !
The Truth Sets You Free ! DoubleBatteryLife come take a look.
Great story. Scary at times for the parents. Wouldn't want to be them. Wait, yes I would.
All this conversation brings back memories of growing up in southern Florida, going to an experimental elementary school and experimental middle school back in the late 60's ("Magnet school" was not a term yet.)
Kids could run forward at their own speed, through a self-paced curriculum, and I was *so* not interested in English, spelling, social studies, and math... but ah, Science!
I could not get enough of Science studies. I had ramped up to doing mid-8th-grade work in the 6th grade.
Alas, that summer we moved from Florida to rural NC, due to a parental job opportunity. where I learned to hate school for a long time, because it was readin'-ritin'-rithmatic plus you got paddled if you got out of line.
It took a while to 'settle down.'
I won the odd science fair (yawn) and spelling bee (yawwwn.) Meh.
However, reflecting, I'm probably more well-rounded in a general sense now, because one experience inspired me, then the other one rationalized me. For the most part, I'm okay with being an Average Joe now.
I will admit that there was this one really cool electronics program in NC, and it was my favorite, and through that I got into IT at an early age (and era) which has served me well in life.
So, all things considered, no complaints... -But I can only wonder what would have happened had that early human experiment been allowed to continue. I don't know, and I won't try to guess. I'm not Taylor-smart, that's for sure.
Like the guy in the story, I'm SO glad that Taylor is on our side.
Random thoughts:
Taylor? Is it possible to generate and broadcast a nuclear-reaction-suppressing field, one that would make nuclear weapons inert? Make nukes obsolete?
While you're there, could we also create little bubbles of un-suppresed "live reaction" space around power reactors, so they could still operate, but would be unable to hose radiation around?
(I visualize this nuclear plant worker, stumbling out of the wrong reactor portal, "Aaaah! I've been irradiated! I'm gonna die!" -And a cop passing by says "step out of the live field, Sir," and then the radiation in his body immediately quenches. "Oh, I guess I'm okay. Thanks, Officer. Sorry I freaked out.")
Let's get even wilder. Let's ask, can we neutralize all forms of ABC weapons at a stroke, through technological means yet unconceived?
Perhaps eliminate the threat of mass destruction altogether?
Anybody, shall we go *totally* wild for a second?
Imagine the greatest feats imaginable?
Perhaps assemble and compress Sol's various asteroids and planetoids, into a second Earth?
Figure out how to generate an Earth-like atmosphere for it?
Use it as a laboratory for terraforming, planetary-scale macro-engineering, and biodrome remediation techniques?
Or maybe just have it as a viable backup planet right next door, if we happen to totally screw this one up?
Heck, why stop at two Earths? I mean, some folks just seem really committed to population growth, don't they? We'd probably have to go scrounging in deep space for planetary mass, though. And a few billion years hence, we'd have to strike a match and light up a new yellow star, then relocate the whole shebang there, when old Sol gets ready to go *pop*.
Doesn't the mind just BOGGLE at the impossibility of all this?
Such immense technical complexity? We'd never be able to wade through it... Surely, anything like THAT just can't be done.
-Except perhaps, by people who don't have "can't" in their vocabulary.
If anyone might know how to unlock our higher destinies, then perhaps it's Taylor, and his ilk, who perhaps live among us now, as yet undiscovered. Those who've just not been propelled forward yet.
Propel them. History awaits.
My $.02
Voss your ideas are overpriced. Value shoppers beware!
One doesn't have to be a genius to be a good parent. The problem is that much genius is being lost because of bad parenting. Our country needs as many geniuses as can be produced to help keep us from destroying ourselves. But, we would rather acknowledge and reward people for being great football players and devious politicians. We invest billions of dollars to build machines of death and destruction. But, how much do we invest to help revive and teach good parenting practices?
Taylor's parents made the effort to acknowledge his gift and guide him instead of knocking him down even when they didn't understand what he was doing. They also made an effort to find people who could provide him with guidance and resources. They took pride in the accomplishments of both of their children. They didn't just let the boys raise themselves. Taylor will probably use his genius to save countless lives. But, will we listen when he and other geniuses like warn us of our misguided intentions? The geniuses who helped invent the atom bomb warned us and our country built it anyway. We are still regretting it.
Certainly, Taylor's parents had to have a little faith and allow him to take a few risks. Kids have to be able to learn from their mistakes so they can grow.
Like at least one other reader I saw bit of my own past in this story. One can't change the past, so regret is not called for, but an important lesson shines through: Children are the smartest humans on the planet -- if we don't grind them down. I've known this for some time -- and I've seen that, unfortunately.
So now let's seen where the man Taylor is becoming can go. And where, possibly, we might follow.
reality is in the eyes of the beholder and by default the hoaxer
He of course may also be a star of major league/college football and baseball however in the UK people know nextto nothing about these disiplines.They certainly would be unable to identify with the name of any superstars. What of couse is a popular sport in the UK is Marbles and large percentage of the UK population could readily roll off their tongues the name of arguably the most renowed exponent- Adrian Collider
Just so that all of you guys know, it was not good parenting that raised this kid to build a fusion reactor, it was money.
How much money do you think that it took to acquire all of the materials necessary to do all of the experiments that he did? How much money do you think that it took to go to the elite private school that he did? And to hire a crane?
In the households that I know of house intellectually superior children, none have the amount of money to buy thousand of dollars worth of equipment. Just so that their child that wants to mess around with fusion can do so.
Hey mom could you go out and buy me some extremely expensive radioactive materials?
Sure honey! Just let me grab my wallet! Anything to keep you from not getting what you want!
I have nothing against this child. I just don't agree that just because one of the thousands of "geniuses" out there's parents had loads of cash, he gets tons of publicity.
Here across the pond great emphasis is put on the likes of the Viking sagas. Probably one of the most significant sagas is the Funfare saga which tells the tale of 3 bold berries wanting very much to try out the waltzers. the cash desk man looks at the berries, knows the centripedal force of the waltzers and is minded by what happens to particles in a hadron collider.the man says to the berries - have you thought this through guys?. the berries are adamant they want to go on and accordingly the worst fears of the man were realized when the 3 berries turned into juice.And so the legend of Adrian Collider was born. It will not come as a surprise to know this and other sagas are taught at UK elementary schools.
my roomate's aunt makes $83/hr on the laptop. She has been without work for 8 months but last month her pay was $8682 just working on the laptop for a few hours. Read more on this site...Nuttyrich . com
"or, more precisely, nuclear fusion, the process (defined by Einstein as E=mc2)"
:O popsci why do you do this to me?
A quick fact check on google or wikipedia will tell you that statement is horrifically wrong.
E=mc^2 describes the amount of energy that matter is made of (matter is a state of energy). Nuclear reactions convert a couple percent of this energy into things like heat and light.
I too, felt great emotion reading this article. I could not stop but finish the rest, including all the commentary. lol
Indeed, parenting whether with money or not, a parent has a major role in any child's developmental stages of life. Being able to provide nutrition is one aspect, separate from being able to provide affection is also just as important. Those children less fortunate without parents and or having just the one parent playing both father and mother roles(can be exceptionally challenging roles), even for a child to bear burden to even pursue dreams worthy of attention.
WE are all evolving to a better state of mind and health...Intelligence plus knowledge equals wisdom. Taylor is proof of this power of information.
Stories are greater when they have purpose and meaning. I believe, we must summon our own strengths and indulge our own passions of creativity, and we do constantly learn. Our only obstacle is our selves.
Just like Taylor, I too, do not have "Can't" in my dictionary per-say.
What we lack, is not our capacity to be greater, but is our will to grow greater larger than life. The only way to overcome this barrier if you do have such a procrastination over thyself is by and through visualization. If you cannot see past the next decade, or century, how will you know what your purpose in life is? The more you visualize, the more you will see that indeed, anything is possible. There are no boundaries what the imagination beholds worth an effort to do. Understanding is just the beginning of our journey. Living is the start of our journey. Dying is another journey, one which we must all pass.
To me, the most incredible of all journeys of life is ascension. Now supposedly Einstein said, if we could use all of our brain power, (where as most of us only use 10%), we would be pure energy.
Ultimately, if one achieves such a miraculous endeavor, it would by the sum of all fears combined, with of course the formula,(intelligence plus knowledge equals wisdom)...lol why not? but who knows...one day, not today, nor tomorrow, we will discover,"the undiscovered country"...
Amazing child. I hope his love and knowlegdge help change the world for a better :)
Wausau Engineering and Global Leadership Academy:
Some of you people might be thinking/saying, this kid can't possibly have the knowledge needed to do. Those are lies, it is quite simple to learn and understand stuff when you learn the way he did. All you have to have is persistence and support. This is almost the same story of Thomas Edison.
As someone who also spent a whole lot of time tinkering with homemade or acquired lab equipment in his parent's basement, won top science fair prizes and the Intel (then Westinghouse) scholarship, and had stories like this one written about him, let me tell you something I know.
90% of the stuff this kid has spent his time doing or thinking about is literally garbage.
Don't believe me? Why is he collecting all this useless and sometimes dangerous junk? That's not doing science, it's just the same as other kids who collect coins or Star Wars memorabilia. Sure, Taylor Wilson learns about isotopes while the other kids learn about coins or fantasy nonsense. But will he do something useful with this knowledge? Maybe, maybe not. Tune in 20 or 30 years from now to find out.
The "fusion reactor" (actually a very common type of experiment which is performed in labs all over the world) was successful only because of the support and guidance of professionals with resources.
The article has it right when it says the difference between Taylor Wilson and David Hahn is the support Wilson has received, and not only from his parents.
Articles like this are always hyped, and the reporter may not even be able to recognize the difference between sense and nonsense.
For example, don't tell me it never occurred to anybody else that a plasma neutron generator could be used to produce medical isotopes. If you wanted to develop and market one, there are plenty of physicists and engineers you could hire to do the job. Almost certainly, by the time you figure in all the costs, it will prove uneconomical, otherwise it would already be standard practice.
This is the story of one lucky, privileged, and no doubt very smart kid -- but how smart? No more than thousands, maybe millions of others, most of whom have not had as much support or as many opportunities. And after all, just a kid. Not a "genius" -- you have to have made some real contributions before you merit that honorific.
I think, based in part on my own experience, that this kind of hyping of the talents and achievements of "extraordinary" kids is actually very damaging both to others who go unrecognized and to the "genius" kids themselves who are given an unrealistic sense of importance and uniqueness while they are actually still at the bottom of life's ladder.
So Taylor, if you're reading this, don't let all this crap go to your pretty little head. Nothing you have done so far counts for anything, and if you stop here, in 10 years nobody will care what you did as a teenager. Your working life, and your work, whatever that will turn out to be, lie ahead of you. I hope it will be something more than collecting bits of radioactive scrap and running amok with dreams and inventions which if an older man pursued them would be taken to mark him not as a genius but as a crank.
@1drkind
you jealous bro?
I say kudos to the kid, sounds like he is a special kid and goes onto some great things.
@mparment - I also thought that it was interesting that this simple equation was not written properly.
For those who don’t want to take the time to look for themselves, “c” represents the speed of light in a vacuum in meters per second or 299792458 meters per second. That means that the difference between “E=mc2” and E=mc^2 is the difference between multiplying the rest mass “m” by 299,792,458 or multiplying it by 59,958,491,689,875,517,873,681,764.
Even Popular Science writers can be forgiven for not being science experts - otherwise who would read the magazine? That being said, an error in the most famous equation this world has known is not a little thing. It is most likely that this “error” is intentional. Someone at some point probably said "readers won't understand what the "^" means so just write it like you hear it".
In this case, I could be wrong and the people at PS don’t know the difference. Either way too much dumbing-down, of the writer or the reader, is a bad thing for America.
Jack Cain
Bucks, Blisters or Blood - Everyone needs to pay for the freedoms we enjoy!
To go with my last comment -
In the story, you have a scientist wondering if it is smart to let a 13 year old play with "tens of thousands of electron volts and deadly x-rays". Later, the story describes Taylor pushing the voltage in his fuser to 50 thousand volts.
Is it possible that the writer and editor of this story really don't understand the difference between "electron volts" and "volts" as well as how to write "E=mc^2"?
Even the most basic fusion of 2 hydrogen atoms produces 1.44 million electronvolts. The type of fusion described in the story produces about 17 million electronvolts for every fusion reaction.
For comparison, a trillion (100,000 million) electronvolt potential is the equivalent of the kinetic energy of a flying mosquito.
A trillion volts, on the other hand is 20,000,000,000 (20 billion) times more potential than the writer describes being used by Taylor in his "fuser". Apply that potential to a DeLorean and you get time travel (grin).
Unless you want to change the name of the magazine to popular errors, please do the 5 minutes of homework you would need to make sure you are using the proper terms.
BTW, most folks now use "eV" or "electronvolt" as one word to prevent this type of mistake.
Jack Cain
Bucks, Blisters or Blood - Everyone needs to pay for the freedoms we enjoy!
"Robot
02/14/12 at 8:47 pm
"Eerie Scary Genius Kid!"
Amazing and startling the toys he plays with!
.............................
Science sees no further than what it can sense.
Religion sees beyond the senses."
Every argument for God and every attribute ascribed to Him rests on a false metaphysical premise. None can survive for a moment on a correct metaphysics . . . .
Existence exists, and only existence exists. Existence is a primary: it is uncreated, indestructible, eternal. So if you are to postulate something beyond existence—some supernatural realm—you must do it by openly denying reason, dispensing with definitions, proofs, arguments, and saying flatly, “To Hell with argument, I have faith.” That, of course, is a willful rejection of reason.
There is no such thing as any god.
@lanredneck -
Not jealous at all, but I can understand how you'd misunderstand my comment.
Let me make it clear: 90% of everything I did when I was his age was garbage, too. 90% of what all of us prizewinning wonderkids did was garbage. No surprise: we were kids, we'd spent maybe a few years playing in some area of science, and our heads were full of nonsense as well as a bit of knowledge. Yet we were encouraged to think we were, actually, geniuses; that our accomplishments were way above those of ordinary teenagers; and that we would surely prosper with our extraordinary talents.
We were used by educators with elitist notions, by the promoters of competitions and their corporate sponsors, and by the media, for whom this kind of story is a staple.
I know that this story is hype because I remember and still have the clippings of stories about young me. And I know the truth.
Teenage kids essentially never come up with something unique, new and important in science. There is no evidence here that Taylor Wilson has. Teenagers are also essentially never competitive at the top of any scientific field. They may be way ahead of their peers, but that's a long way from meriting "genius" laurels.
"Genius" is mainly just another kind of hero worship, and it properly goes to those who actually make great contributions, not to people who are just smart, or ahead of the curve while still young.
A lot of smart kids and smart adults never accomplish much of anything. Part of the reason for this is that the real world can be a very harsh place, and basically, nobody cares how smart you are, or were; they only care if they can use you for their own purposes. It's pretty important to understand this if you want to actually get ahead, and getting so much hyped-up praise at a young age can cause you to have some very unrealistic expectations.
The work for Taylor Wilson lies ahead, and so do lots of pitfalls. Believing that by building a plasma neutron generator and being featured in stories like this one, he has accomplished something great, is one huge trap which I sincerely hope he does not fall into.
1drkind
He /has/ already done something useful. From Wikipedia:
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Department of Energy offered federal funding to Wilson concerning research Wilson has conducted in building inexpensive Cherenkov radiation detectors; Wilson has declined on an interim basis due to pending patent issues.[1] Traditional Cherenkov detectors usually cost hundreds of thousands of dollars (USD), while Wilson invented a working detector that cost a few hundred dollars.[1] In May 2011, Wilson entered his radiation detector in the Intel International Science and Engineering Fair against a field of 1,500 competitors and won a $50,000 award.[1][2] The project was entitled “Countering Nuclear Terrorism: Novel Active and Passive Techniques for Detecting Nuclear Threats” and won the First Place Award in the Physics and Astronomy Category, Best of Category Award, and the Intel Young Scientist Award.
I'd say that's fairly 'unique, new and important'.
Tremendous article, wonderful stuff. Tom Clynes is a writer's writer, a master craftsman. My gratitude is darn near unbounded.
johngalt2122,
While the young man in the article is really smart and very surprising to all of us as we read the article, sorry if I do not enjoy the same bowl of corn flakes you are eating.
Did you ever consider in life, you will get or receive exactly what you believe in life, at the end? So at the end, we may both be correct. I hope you enjoy your journey of science and have a complete understanding of science and biology of worms as they devour your body bit by bit. I choose to see life and its journey much further. Take care.
.............................
Science sees no further than what it can sense.
Religion sees beyond the senses.
This is one of the best articles I have seen lately on PopSci. Indeed my faith in mankind has been replenished. Taylor Wilson is the child I had wished I grew up to be when I first started reading Popular Science.
rochrist:
Cerenkov radiation is light which is created when high-energy massive particles pass through some material medium in which the speed of light is lower than the speed of the particles. It is detected with any photosensor; to make a high-sensitivity radiation detector one uses a high-sensitivity photosensor such as a photomultiplier tube or avalanche solid-state sensor. I do not doubt that Wilson was able to build one for a few hundred bucks. Any competent experimental physicist could do as well. I also don't doubt that commercial units have prices that range much higher, although "hundreds of thousands" is either wrong or refers to a system which is much more than a single detector and also much more than anything Wilson could possibly have built. As for the government "offer" of funding, you know, DHS among all government agencies is especially notorious for ripoffs and money thrown at bad ideas, and even so, I doubt that the story is being accurately reported here. More likely the bureaucrats told him he could probably get a grant if he had a company and submitted a proposal, but he doesn't have the company, doesn't have the patent rights cleared, and so he hasn't submitted a proposal. The bottom line is, maybe Wilson did come up with a nice detector design, but that's just the sort of thing someone his age might be able to do. The rest of this is just more hype. It always is.
Hah! I looked at Wilson's website; he didn't even come up with any particularly efficient detector design; he just bolted a photomultiplier on top of a can of water. No wonder there is a patent issue. What is praiseworthy here is to have recognized that such a detector would be a low-cost alternative to DHS's since-shelved plan to deploy hundreds of giant portal monitors with detectors based on He-3; a boondoggle which was going to dry up the nation's supply of a rare isotope which is much more valuable for other uses. Wilson is not the only person to have criticized this, and I doubt he was the first to recognize Cerenkov/H2O as a possible alternative. If he was, where is the peer-reviewed journal publication? Nice science fair project.
@1drkind
I see what you're saying and your comments have a lot of truth to them, but Taylor looks like the kind of person who will be capable of doing something important. Just because he hasn't done anything world-changing yet doesn't rule anything out, and there's no denying that he has a strong interest in the field of nuclear physics and has made plenty of steps in the right direction to pursue a life of work in that field. The hype might even do him some good; who wouldn't want to make the most of their abilities when they have the support of researchers, scientists, and the media?
This kid has plenty of potential, and being cynical about stories like this gets nobody anywhere.
For those ready to accuse me of putting down young Mr. Wilson, I'm really not. My beef is more with popsci, et al., for this over-the-top publicity hype which I don't think is healthy either for its subject or for other kids (and adults) left feeling that they can't possibly compete with such natural brilliance. Especially rhetoric like "someone like him comes along maybe once in a generation" and inflation of his achievements as already representing important contributions to science and to national security.
What is clearly outstanding about Wilson is his energy and determination in pursuing his interests, bearing in mind that he has also benefited from an extraordinary amount of help. If he keeps that up, and doesn't turn into a publicity freak, I expect that a productive and rewarding career lies ahead of him.
The biggest difference between this kid and David Hahn is that this kid comes from money. I'm not disparaging that he has resources, but he didn't get these connections or his grasp of social politics from natural disposition. His dad is / was president of the Coca Cola bottling of Arkansas -- this is a high 5 figure - 6 figure salary ATM. You can google Kenneth Wilson Arkansas Coca Cola and you'll find his manta.com profile.
And for those who think it's so progressive to rent a crane for your son's birthday, it was probably as much of a difficulty as it is for Steven Spielburg to buy a pony for his daughter just because she 'wanted' one.
Let's put things in persepective here -- Land Rover, Coca Cola President, just picks up and moves from AK to Reno for the kid to go to school. Obviously this kid is a genius, but the reason for success is more obvious than just 'supportive parents' it's 'really rich and socially rich supportive parents.' There is nothing we can learn from this that hasnt been shown for thousands of years of feudalism -- smart kids who have the means will come to the top, sometimes Horatio Alger will surface. The odds are stacked for geniuses like this, and stacked against someone like David Hahn. We should lionize someone like David Hahn, but unfortunately he's in jail now last I heard.
I went to one of those high schools where football was first, baseball or basketball second and academics were several rungs below that. High school was awful. The jocks got too much leeway.
However in my junior year I started to meet a few people for whom academics were a priority and a few teachers that supported them above all else. I wrote computer programs that my teacher didn't even understand. I still got a low 'C' in the class. I wasn't a genius, just a kid who was interested in anything but football, baseball or basketball.
College offered a bit more opportunity to explore science and so did my Dad's garage and now my own garage. I went on to get an engineering degree, spent six years in the Navy (Electrician, Nuke program), do well for my family today.
We need to celebrate these kids more than we do. They need to be encouraged as much as the kids who run around carrying or chasing a ball on a field or court. THIS is the reason that the Asian and Indian kids do so well in school. They get alot of pressure yes, but they also get alot of encouragement.
I worry about this family's garage. I wouldn't want to risk my family's health sharing walls with the toxic mess shown in the pictures. As a parent I am not going to allow my child (a novice) to make promises he may or may not be able to back up with real facts. As a parent I get the final word on what goes on in my house or on my property. Would I work extra hard to get this kid into classes and programs so he could mix with professionals to learn and experiment? Absolutely.
It's amazing what we can accomplish without the TV on... ;)
I know of Great Inventor-Scientist, Dr. Nicholas Tesla, Father of Modern Technology & Particle Physics.
He Patented many of his Inventions & started a revolution in the Technology of AC, Radio, Robotics, Digital Computer, etc.,
that has not stopped & is being reapplied it's use now & in the Future of Mankind. He had a 4 dimensional mind that is
a gift from his ancestor, the primates that had a photographic memory.
N. Tesla most fascinating technology was the Tesla Coil, that can generate millions of Volts & produce an
electrical output called: Longitudinal Magneto Dielectric Wave, that can travel faster than the speed of light(1.53)
with time & can produce all the Plasma you need for Fusion. A Russian Engineer was able converted it to regular A/C output.
Is 99.99 o/o efficient. N. Tesla was definitely the Man Out Of Time.
An Engineer Eric Dollard explain it all of in youtube.
Myself I used one of his Patent, the Ozone(O3) Machine to cure cancer of my mother, daughter, puppy dog after she ate some
Castor Beans, my friend's dying fish that was lain on his side & barely breathing & came back to life in 5 minutes & used it on
myself.
What the Ozone(O3) does it builds a person's Immune System & gets rid of toxic in the body.
You are very lucky to have parents so understanding & are on your side of your achievements.
Only one word of advice is Safety First on your work!
I hope you will be called: The Father of the Future Innovations of Science & Technologies.
Take Care & the Best of Luck in Your Future.
Oscar A Ros
OMG... get this kid the money and research facilities he needs ... he probably can have a usable Fusion reactor that produces an abundance of surplus of power in 5 years.... give him free reign... challenge him to give us independence from fossils fuels... this is a diamond in the rough but a true science Gem... heck how about fusion powered space shuttle, mars, and beyond
Go Taylor!!!
"Science sees no further than what it can sense."
I believe Einstein would beg to differ.
"Science sees no further than what it can sense.
Religion sees beyond the senses."
No. Science is when dreams become reality.
Religion is when dreams are mistaken for reality.
Amazing stuff! This guy's managed to get all the pieces in place (and I'm not talking about his fusion reactor). The capacity of the mind is awe-inspiring....
I'm just as fascinated with the comments, though (well, *almost* as fascinated).
I'm struck by the idea of people second-guessing this kid's parenting. One contributor wrote: "Shouldn't we draw our conclusions based on the methods instead of the result?" [marcoreid] There *_are_* no methods for raising kids like this (come to think of it, there may not be 'methods' for raising kids at all!). Every person is a context unto him- or herself, and each has to be addressed individually. If a kid has an appetite for knowledge, feed it! If that puts him or her in a situation that requires added safety, make sure that those features are there. All you can ever do - with any kid - is wing it.
It's also astounding how many people claim they are just as bright as this guy, but something held them back. I'm not in a position to say, one way or the other - that's between you and your gods, your conscience, and/or your psychiatrist. But if you had a crappy upbringing that didn't allow you to reach your potential, welcome to humanity... all of us hit limits at some point, and all of us have baggage. The thing is, we also have this remarkable capacity to heal (it's what we do best - we've been doing it since the first cell division), and that includes the ability to go back and 're-parent' ourselves where needed. People do it all the time. Get out of the self-justification and complaining mode, and get on with becoming who you're meant to be. We'll all be better off (including you), if you do.
David
Unusually smart kid and compelling story. Know a few people like that, and they almost blew themselves up a few times.
There should be more schools for the gifted. Public schools tend to be more machinated these days, because of their size, political correctness, and bureaucracy, so these kids don't get much out of it or can actually be stifled by it. These parents certainly weren't stifling.
But something about the article bothered me. Maybe it was the way the parents were letting their kid run things while playing with chemicals that could blow up the whole town.
It just seems careless, and kind of egotistical and selfish on their part. I am all for nurturing gifted kid's abilities, but not at the behest of harming innocent people. Send the kid to a university lab FIRST, where he can be protected. That is the parent's duty, at least until 18. Honestly, I'm surprised the cops didn't call out the bomb squad!
Their argument was that they couldn't stop him even if they tried. This is a highly gifted kid, but still a kid,and the parents are responsible for his behavoir. Instead, they brought him up indulging his every whim. Sure, teenagers will get around rules if they want to, and get into trouble,or even get themselves killed. Teenager's like to test authority, to know the limits of their power. Teenage years are rough years for parents. It's a give and take, for sure.
But allowing him to handle something that not even Einstein fully understood seems presumptuous and irresponsible. Just because my kid can communicate with sharks, doesn't mean I should throw him in the tank.
What if the kid had blown himself up? A very different article would have been written.
Also, kind of disturbing that any smart kid could find on the internet the ingredients to build something that leveled Hiroshima is scary. Pandora's box has been opened.
Regarding the negative comments: I'm one of the neighbors. Taylor would knock on our door wearing his lab coat and teach us about things going on in the neighborbood. He has the most incredible, responsible parents you could ever meet and we were never worried about his experiments. I suggest you don't judge his parents considering you don't know them.
Awesome kid. Congrats Taylor on what you have accomplished so far. I'm not talking about the nuke stuff, but the attitude toward learning and doing on your own. You will need that later in life when you choose to actually do something good for the world.
I encourage you to take full advantage of the perks that society has blessed you with while you can. They don't last and in fact, they get much harder. These days, if you're under 18 and you "accomplish" something outstanding (even proving that you can learn faster than the rest of the pack), people will shower you with praise. Once you turn 21 or graduate college, you can only get support if you have credentials behind you. (19-20 yr olds are a gray area.)
As someone in the same group as many commenters (gifted but not privileged enough to get anything praised beyond family and friends), I can tell you that there is literally no way besides pure luck to get something big accomplished without that socially accredited credibility. Everything you do comes off like whining and complaining or it goes the other way and appears as arrogance. If you're like most of us, you'll go learn other related subjects quickly and on your own and return for another try. The more you learn, the worse it gets. The more you create, the worse it gets also. You'll find yourself dumbing down how you act just to fit in. And should you be stricken with morals guiding what you do, you won't even do well in the science field. No one wants a scientist to tell them they can't use your creation to rape society of more money. You're only hope is to get a high paying research job at a university lab and hope they let you study what interests you. That's the path my HS rival took and while he makes a ton of money, I wouldn't want to be him!
Should you want to create things that genuinely change the world for the better, (and this offer includes the other gifted commenters), take a look at the facebook group "Occupy Prosperity". We're gathering and coordinating the talent it takes to bring the tools to market that people need in order to solve every one of today's 20 biggest problems. We have most of them theoretically solved and are working on implementation but we could always use some additional help. It's amazing what a group of people can do together with a common set of goals!
Wow, all I can say is this makes me think that if the world ends up blowing apart, he might have a hand in it. Im not talking on purpose, but no doubt completely by accident. On a serious note, this kid needs to harness all that brain power and get this nation running back where it should be scientifically. I believe he could do it by himself!
More power to you Taylor!
1drkind,
Your comments are less than helpful. You may have had a different experience with the work you did and how you perceived your work and yourself, but you cannot speak for or judge Mr. Wilson.
You claim 90% of the work, interests, thoughts Mr. Wilson has are "garbage". Relative to what? You seem to compare a student's work to some absolute standard of usefulness that really has no bearing. What Mr. Wilson has done has merit now, regardless whether he pursues it further with success or not and regardless of what he may or may not achieve in the future. Gaining knowledge and exploring the world around you with passion is not 90% garbage in any sense.
WOW, I,...just,..ah,...WOW !!!!
I used to ride my Dirt Bike and had some summer party's in Bayo Canyon when I was in Middle School...aahh the fun of living in Los Alamos.
I wish I was that smart......but it would be pretty deadly to be that smart! LOL
the term for a lost nuke is "empty quiver". "Broken Arrow" is a call for an airstrike.
Seems like fun, until an accident occurs and we read about criminal charges. What about the bomb making materials and the formula for a dirty bomb? But its all in fun, say the editors of Popular Science. Not to mention the fact nuclear safety and security has been relegated to sophomoric expression of fun in the garage. The size of an event situation is only a matter of the quantity/mass of the materials to be utilized.
"Let’s see, we’ve got about 60 pounds of uranium, bomb fragments and radioactive shards,” Taylor says. “This thing would make a real good dirty bomb.”In truth, the radiation levels are low enough that, without prolonged close-range exposure, the cargo poses little danger. Still, we stifle the jokes as we pull up to curbside check-in. “Think it will get through security?” Tiffany asks Taylor.
“There are no radiation detectors in airports,” Taylor says. “Except for one pilot project, and I can’t tell you which airport that’s at.”
We land in Reno and make our way toward the baggage claim. “I hope that box held up,” Taylor says, as we approach the carousel. “And if it didn’t, I hope they give us back the radioactive goodies scattered all over the airplane.” Soon the box appears, adorned with a bright strip of tape and a note inside explaining that the package has been opened and inspected by the TSA. “They had no idea,” Taylor says, smiling, “what they were looking at.”
Such security at airports, but lets take the shoes off of grandma and strip search her as obviously she's a threat. The idiocy of government's officials never ends.
Having been assigned at various military assignments where the "ranges," current and old, were strewn with ordinance exploded and unexploded I am surprised by this statement and wonder about the credibility of the article or the effectiveness of security in an area which should be off limits. (Refering to a lost thermo nuclear device} "Willis picks up a large chunk of the bomb’s outer casing, still painted dull green, and calls Taylor over. “Wow, look at that warp profile!” Taylor says, easing his scintillation detector up to it. The instrument roars its approval. Willis, seeing Taylor ogling the treasure, presents it to him. Taylor is ecstatic. “It’s a field of dreams!” he yells. “This place is loaded!”
The moral to this story is obvious to this old soldier, "Homeland Security" is a joke. This article, if true, exposes at least 2 serious lapses in preventive security measures.
I feel that I agree with those whom state that this may be an incident of another 'radioactive boyscout' that was simply contained by indulging the child. I think the author of the article goes into a bit of creative imagination trying to make it appear as if the selfishness of a child was really just the higher intellect of a superior being. If he hadn't been indulged he might have been quite dangerous with his little explosive, or perhaps I should say not so little explosive experiments.
And certainly, one accidental fire or violent weather event could have spelled disasterous with his garage filled with such materials. The 'amusing' little story about him spilling radioactive liquid on the dirveway was not funny to me in the least. Not to mention the almost gleeful story about how they illegally transported uranium from a site the army had claimed was cleaned up. Regardless of any lack of signs, there are laws about the transport of hazardous materials, and this is an admission that they were broken.
This child, most likely, has been very lucky. And that he eventaully ended up with adults helping him reduced the chances of accidents. yet they also have taught him that rules do not matter, rather it's what he desires and can get away with that is what is truely important.
Also, as someone who usually tested in the top 15%-20% of america's students, I was appalled at the comment that the top one percent of americas students are the least served. I ran my schools computers for them in the sixth grade, I was interested in psychology, physics, military history and reading far, far beyond my level for years at this point, but I was continuously being pulled from school programs that ran out of money, or were cancelled because of policy changes. I was from a poor family in a small southern city. I have met several people who run the entire line of student profiles, rich, intelligent students that recieved good educations but lacked the motivation to do anything, relying on their inheritances to support themselves, as well as I've also had friends, just as bright or smarter than myself, who have floundered in life due to a lack of education that brought out their skills and talents. So how can the top one percent have these opportunities before them, in alot of caces perhaps not everything they deserve, yet HOW can you compair this to other students, still bright and desiring to learn, yet they fall totally out of the school systems entirely?
This article makes me think we still have the same ages old problem of those who live in the ivory towers of intellectual society are detacted from the reality around them, sheltered too much by campus life and the coddled environment of researchers who are more comfortable confronting the mysteries of science than facing the realities of the world they live in and the people they share it with.
At some point everyone is a risk. From the extremely dangerous Da Vinci with his radicle ideas, Einstein playing god or Curry trying to peer through our skin.
The fact is this young man has been found, is able to publish and is now supervised. Instead of taking a negative look at what could have been.....i.e. (if the Manhattan Project would have evaporated the earth) and let's use this and other new Eisteins and figure out the worlds issues.
There will always be those resistant to change; who needs a light bulb when we can run gas lamps? The nay sayers help create restraints that are necessary for the truly innovative to overcome and better the brillant ideas they fester.
@Midoman, advanced propulsion _is_ the means to simulated gravity.
Think of the nose of the craft as 'up', not 'forward'; continuous thrust - even at ~0.1g - would simultaneously radically reduce flight duration and provide a (relatively) hospitable environment for the crew/passengers.
Of course, in order to not blow past the destination at galactic escape velocity, the vehicle would need to 'flip' at midcourse, and decelerate continuously for the remainder.
Great Story. Those who say can't need to get out of the way of those of that are doing it.
Great Story. Those who say can't need to get out of the way of those of us that are doing it.
my roomate's aunt makes $83/hr on the laptop. She has been without work for 8 months but last month her pay was $8682 just working on the laptop for a few hours. Read more on this site...Nuttyrich . com
(((OO)))OMNIBUS1'Refreshing; A rare tacit of the future soup that "smacks" of American history in the make. A young "Edison" story if You will, I can hear this being told 100 years from now, (cross those finger's )'father of some great "paradigm" shift in our very way of approaching a problem.
Perhaps a better form of "calculus" or a "Lorentz" "transformation 'that "simplify's more efficiently.
Disproportionatly ;That positive news was offset by the myriad negative comments that inevitably get posited, in the name of self edification ? strange perception and concept base floating around out there ? ;(cornucopia)of psychiatric client bases A.K.A. The "ID"! expo!lol..SO! I'm in good company...and can throw MY 200..."ish" I.Q.in Your albeit "Neanderthal"faces! "BWAhahah!" 'brother'! 'can You believe the legends in some peoples own mind's?
I digressed ..anyway ,I wasn't aware of a school for the "super" gifted..(can't imagine why they didn't call Me?)X-Men and mutants Sci-Fi -ish sounding, (HOPE)arrives nick of time for Man to carry on? future looks dismal ,before it get's better? We need another "Hawking" , another "Penrose"
Another "Paradigm"leap.The kid could be the tacit turned axiom We need.
"Einstein" said You can't solve a equation by using the same thinking You used when the problem occurred,(Or My interpretation of what He said..proper),I forget His turn of the century xact caption ? back when coordinates was co-ordinates,('trivia)No I won't be giving the "heuristic value of relativity" and quantum physics anytime soon! But He wrote wunderbar quotes of concept and wisdom many never attribute to a seemingly dry old physicist, "Philosophically" a genius as well. (Go figure)
I hope this is a new trend , not just intelligence wise, but the growing apparent (empathy) behind his focus could save society in way's a super computer could only give postscript statistics of.
The sociopathic modern self centrist or ,I.E. advertisement slaves are a great equation for self destruction, (Follow that carrot!)You need brains in Your skull; not Gold in Your teeth..
How many other kids have been swatted down when they showed this level of genius?
Having the money to send your kids to advanced schools is great.
Support from their teachers? Yeah right.
Maybe they just give up and smoked dope.
Because that’s what happened to me.
No 'woe is me' just what happened.
How many other geniuses have just given up?
We will never know.
Oh, and you sanctimonious “I did it, so could you” 'people'.
I WORKED to help pay the bills, since I was 13, when was I supposed to study?
We need to be able to nuture this kind of talent, but there's no money in it, so we dont
@truthismyname I accutally went through the same dilemma just a few years ago, I was being tested for ADHD/ADD and found out that I had an iq over 130! It left me shocked I never knew of how intelligent I could truly be. But the doctor had later told me why mine was so high... It was because man and woman with ADD and ADHD use 5-10% and sometimes 15% more brain power than the average human, but it also is why I and others cannot concentrate well enough to do well in school. It took me my freshman year if high school to realize that I could change for the better. My grades were F's in history and Literature now my best subjects... To High B's and eventually my first A. I am still in high school trying to figure myself out and become a honors student. To give a good example look at Thomas Edison and many more innovators and scientist. Only if. Could go back in time and have a conversation with Thomas Edison to see how he dealt with it all as well as my dyslexia another thing Thomas and I had in common!
I'd like to see this kid's brain scan. We can see what's going on inside his ridiculously smart brain.
Great article. But I wonder whether it really was a "nuclear-pharmacist friend" who came over to check on safety practices. I'm thinking maybe it was a nuclear physicist.
I hope I can give the same attention and support to my kids.
Taylor's good intentions of discovery for his isotopes are profound and majestic to help with a cure.
In other news, hopefully in time, if Taylor ever figures out how to create energy surplus for all of us, his energy invention or technology of such fusion reactor(s) will never be allowed to dominate over oil. (So even if Taylor masters his domain, he might never see his energy invention profiteering in his own country, but perhaps could do very well in a third world country where oil is too costly? Who knows, but perhaps not even Taylor can figure out how to solve the world's immediate problems, when supposedly giant corporate figures could be pulling all the strings?...)
Fusion reactor technology is not ready for our world, because it's a technology disruptor. Also, our leaders today simply cannot interfere with the economic benefits that exist today with oil consumption.
There are probably already many technology disruptors that have been invented, but are just out there collecting dust in a shelf somewhere(probably bought out by the U.S. government), and probably will only benefit by the major underground cities, that supposedly no one knows about.
Why would the government do that? My guess is that the bush administration was probably one of the highest authorities to make deals with the major oil reserves in the Middle East...All of those contracts worth billions if not trillions, even today, they(U.S. government) are probably still raking in from those negotiations, and or contracts. That oil including other oil reserves will be around for another 50 years before they run dry. So there's no way that any new technology energy surplus driven will ever be allowed for activation. But by then, maybe Taylor's energy invention will finally be realized, if it hasn't already been invented, (sitting on the shelf collecting dust)...
If one ever wishes to see their energy inventions like a fusion reactor come to good use, they should be directed to run for Presidency, and orient themselves to make the necessary changes that needed for a cleaner, greener future for all of us, and for our future generations, because at this rate, Mother nature will measure us accordingly if we do not change by our own willingness to shape up, and smarten up...
Everything is everything. Life is life. Some people will never know what they have in front of them until they lose it. Lets hope, and pray that there are more Taylor a-likes out there with the same decency and respect for life, even if it means,(for them)tinkering with the most dangerous, and extreme rare Earth elements.
Keep up the good work boy...
Not sure if anyone has brought it up... But these parents should preserve some of their reproductive material for the future greater good. Seriously... They obviously have something in their genes that produces top notch, super-charged brains. They are two for two!
Someone, anyone, please tell him it's impossible to build the Starship Enterprise.
That kid is not the only kid out there who possesses this ability.
Other kids in countries like Iran, Russia, and China have this ability.
And there are multitudes of others, not children, who are learning how to do great things.
For example, me.
I am creating an electrical generator which runs itself continually, without the need of any fuel source whatsoever.
This is a small device which can emit more than 7,000 WATTS continuously on its own.
And when I finish my working example I am going to post it as fast and as often all over the web as I can before some bureaucratic jerk tries to stop me.
I am going to prove to you electricians, mathematicians, and scientific theorists that you are all wrong!
And when I do you will be shaking your heads in denial saying it is impossible, unbelievable, and a lie.
However, I am going to offer the schematics and where to buy the parts FOR FREE.
WHY?
Because huge hydro plants, huge nuclear plants, and huge coal plants are NOT the answer to the green initiative.
Small devices capable of powering two homes in one home is the answer, and the knowledge to be able to do this should be free.
This will also help hundreds of millions of people worldwide who are nowhere near electrical power grids to have their own energy generating device safely hidden within their homes.
And these devices will not just power a silly light bulb!
They will power anything that can be powered in any mid sized home, including heaters, air conditioners, water heaters, TVs, computers, etc, and all at the same time, for free!
The device costs money, and the reason why I don't have a working device, yet, is because it costs about $2,000.
As soon as I have that money saved up I will have my working device!
I am going to take Nicolas Tesla's idea of offering global electrical power using huge apparatuses, and I am going to show how it can be done with the small devices safely inside a building and without the need for outside electrical power lines.
In fact, my idea can fit on a hand truck easily, so that it can be moved around if need be!
I cannot tell anyone anymore than that until I have a working example.
Once I have a working device I have to put a video and the information on how to construct the device all over the internet as fast as I can so that no one can silence me.
Others have tried to do what I am doing, but they lacked the internet, and they are in jail, dead, or have never been heard from again.
I, however, have an advantage over those who have been silenced before.
I have even found old patents, which were requested, but which were never completed.
Of course, there are no reasons given why they never finished their patents.
Could have been a lack of money, but I could never find out why.
The idea is sound, and it is going to work.
In fact, I researched the components and found that I can make a device which will pump out 15,000 WATTS continuously, and the parts last much longer than the $2,000 model I am trying to build, but this more powerful device costs $5,000 to put together.
In any case, as soon as I prove this device works, and I post the evidence all over the internet, I will come back here and give you the links to everything, both the schematics, where to buy the parts, from what company, and links to each part on the internet.
I am going to be completely transparent, because that is exactly what Jesus is telling me to do!
He is showing me how to do this, and He only asks that I freely share this information with the entire world!
...
SaintlyMic.com
JESUSisGOD.com
The greatest inventor of all time is Jesus Christ!
He created everything first!
To SaintlyMic...there are electric generators "the hummingbird" on "freeelectricity.com".
To the rest of you this kid reminds me of me. I got my first chemistry lab at age 7, at 12 I had the fastest '57 chevy in town (family owned a garage and wrecking yard), at 13 blew up my mom's backyard into our swimming pool. in between was building rockets, played chess, and graduated at 16, astounding my Calculus, and physics teachers. I also built two working replica 24lb Naval cannons in Machine shop, and fired them threw my moms fence. are you getting the picture??? believe me you want this kid for a neighbor, and not me. My neighbors told my mom if the roof on our garage ever slide back revealing a bigger rocket, they were moving. My thesis at Univ. of Calif., was nuclear processes. Afterwards went into the Air Force,testing out at 185IQ, and obtaining a high leval security clearance. Later when I became a cop I was brought into the captains office, and was told that clearance was higher than everybody in the dept. Personally I enjoy my freedom, and can ride a Harley alone, without an entourage of federal agents like Werner Von Braun did. Let me tell you this, unless he is buying high speed cathode-ray oscilloscopes,and sync-cameras, and playing with UF6 compressed into an aluminum like machinable material, along with tanks full of tritium gas. I would't worry about him blowing your town up. Right now he is in good hands, and being watched. More than likely he already has that entourage, and with the right direction most likely will make something of himself. As for the crybabies blame God for not being featured in a Science Mag. Me...I get to go to work knowing I can machine high tol. nuclear probes used in oil and gas exploration.
This made me cry when I first read it.
captainjman: I don't know how to send this to you directly. I just registered and apparently you did not set up to be contacted via email.
Don't let anyone tell you you cannot write.
You communicate just fine.
Communication requires not only an intelligent source, but also an intelligent target.
reminds me of Ender from "Ender's Game". scary smart kid everyone knew that would eventually do great
This article scares me, as well as the comments. The fact that this kid just walked onto a plane with 60 pounds of radioactive material is absurd, as so is the fact that we smile upon children making yellow cake so long as they are a "genius". David Hahn was just as, or probably more brilliant than this kid, and he was punished despite not doing half of the illegal things this kid is, and this is only because he is a "genius".
Also, please stop posing negative comments about our negative comments. Just because you don't agree with our opinions does not make them wrong, or us jealous, but the fact that this kid is probably going to be able to do whatever he wants because he is famous, while the rest of us that have also accomplished things are getting left behind just bothers me.
Remember Marie Curie. I hope the young man and his family wear radiation badges and have the badges read regularly. Otherwise McDuderson might be right, and that would be a pity.
Burdman111, keep in mind that his activities have been inspected by professionals with relevant safety training, and the article specifically mentions that 1) the package was inspected by the TSA and 2) the items in it were not on the prohibited list. To harm you with this stuff on an airplane, he'd have to have it with him in the cabin and force you to swallow it or something. Even then, I'd be more worried about heavy metal poisoning than radioactivity.
And if he does get special access and privileges: GOOD! His accomplishments are dramatic and is altogether fitting that he gets a higher level of recognition than most people. He is famous for good reason. Being bothered that you get left behind compared to this guy is like complaining that you don't get to go to the moon.
1drkind,
When I talked to Taylor at the 24th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, he didn't act or sound like a kid at all. He knows a lot. It wasn't a case of "oh, look at the kid talking to the scientists, isn't that cute?" I didn't have to dumb down anything. He gets it. For reference, I am a graduate student near the end of a PhD program in physics.
I also think that any hype is not all the writer's fault. I actually met Tom and he was asking conference attendees what they thought of Taylor. I think a lot of us are pretty impressed with this guy and our answers would've reflected that.
eldond,
First of all, I would like to respond by stating that TSA does not carry geiger counters for testing packages. They may have badge docimiters, but a package could irradiate a plane over two hours, when the badge is only near the source for a few seconds. Second, gamma radiation penetrates through a lot, including a package and whatever is between the cargo bay and the main cabin, so even though this material was likely not very radioactive, radioactive materials could still pose a threat to people who are in the cabin.
Second, don't get me wrong, I'm all for special access for interested students, I just do not approve of special access for students only because of their fame.
Thirdly, I've read many articles on farsworth fusors, the kind Taylor built, and they are not difficult, they just take time and money, something this kid obviously comes from.
Finally, Taylor's Cerenkov detector is not new or revolutionary. It is a simple, crude, and not accurate. Even though it is simple, it is nowhere near precise enough to do most of the most basic tasks expected of a Cerenkov detector. I sincerely hope he is not granted a patent for this device, as it is not effective enough to be used on any large scale, nor is it original. I strongly disapprove of media hype an praise related to this kid, but although I disagree with your views, you still have the right to express them, and I do encourage thought through discussions, as many new thoughts have occurred to me through these discussions.
Based on the description, sounds like he built a Hirsch-Farnsworth fusor, or maybe an Elmore-Tuck-Watson (what the Navy's Polywell fusion machine is loosely based on, as well as Mark Suppes' machine). Pretty impressive for a 14-year-old. OTOH containment is always terrible in these devices so they've never been anywhere close to producing net power (doubt he's figured that one out yet!) though Polywells show promise.
Hopefully he doesn't stop with a "gee whiz, I made fusion!" project. It would be nice to see more effort at extending fusion into something useful, as opposed to the last few decades' sorry parade of billion-dollar experiments that make great careers for PhDs but are ultimately of little practical value.