Feature
Preserved in Antarctica since 1907, the Scotch that Ernest Shackleton drank is now available in stores

The Rediscovered Bottles courtesy Whyte and Mackay

In 1907, Ernest Shackleton and crew set out on the ship Nimrod to visit Antarctica and, they hoped, the South Pole. The good news was, the entire party survived the trip, thanks in part to the Rare Old Highland Whisky they brought to the frozen continent. But the expedition was forced to evacuate in 1909, some 100 miles short of the Pole they sought. And, as winter ice encroached and the men hurried home, they left behind three cases of the choice whisky.

In 2007, just about a century later, the whisky was found, intact, at the expedition's hut at Cape Royds in Antarctica.

The stuff was made by Mackinlay & Co at the Glen Mhor distillery in 1896 or thereabouts. Mackinlay hasn't been an active brand for a while now, but the current owner of the Mackinlay name, Whyte and Mackay, obtained a few of the precious bottles and set out to do what any right-thinking Scot would do: first, taste the whisky; and second, attempt to analyze and re-create it. The result, a product called Mackinlay's Rare Old Highland Malt Whisky, is, as of this writing, buyable in stores.

How was the re-creation carried out? Dr. James Pryde, chief chemist at Whyte and Mackay, subjected the samples to a comprehensive chemical analysis, in conjunction with a rigorous sensory analysis (that is, sniffing and tasting). Firstly, it was established that the alcoholic strength of the whisky was high enough that it very likely never froze over the years it spent interred in Antarctica. In winter, the hut reached a minimum temperature of -32.5°C, but, at 47 percent alcohol, the whisky remained liquid down to a couple of degrees cooler than that extreme. This eliminated what had been a significant source of concern about the quality of the sample, that decades of freezing and thawing had altered or ruined it. Carbon dating verified that the whisky did indeed date from the Shackleton era.

Syringe of Whisky: Instead of pulling the corks, the scientists drew whisky from the bottles through a sterile needle.  Journal of the Institute of Brewing

Phenol and related phenolic compounds show up in Scotch whiskies, giving them the unmistakable character that's referred to "peaty," because the flavor is introduced when the grain is exposed to peat smoke during the malting process. Chemical analysis revealed not only the quantity of phenolics in the Mackinlay -- surprisingly low, given that era's reputation for heavily peated malts -- but also the particular balance of compounds, which enabled the experts to pinpoint what region the peat used had likely come from. The answer? Orkney.

Similarly, analysis of the compounds that result from barrel-aging was able to finger the barrels in which the whisky was aged as ones made from American oak and probably used once before to age wine or sherry. Gas chromatograph olfactometry, in which the spirit is broken down into its volatile components and each of these smelled individually by experts, gave clues as to details of the fermentation and distilling process. The analysts write:

Other aromas detected by olfactometry and related to lactic acid bacterial growth were a stale solvent aroma of ethyl 2-butenoate, and sweet/ peaches, sweet/peaches/coriander leaf aroma at retention times of 15.4, 38.71 and 39.41 min respectively; the latter retention indices and descriptors agreeing with those published for γ- and δ-dodecalactones.

Armed with all this detail, Whyte and Mackay's master distiller, Richard Paterson, was able to delve into the wealth of warehoused casks and, with the help of his prodigious nose, blend a number of whiskies in exact proportions to replicate the Shackleton spirit. The re-creation, which is given a stint in sherry casks before bottling, includes some of the remaining whisky from the Glen Mhor distillery, which was demolished in 1986, supplemented with comparable liquor from nearby Dalmore. Benriach, Glenfarclas, and other Speyside whiskies lend their character, along with Balblair, Pulteney, and Jura.

Sensory Analysis: The characteristics of the three sample bottles were mapped thusly.  Journal of the Institute of Brewing

The resulting blend was subjected to the same battery of chemical analysis as the original, and found to stack up quite comparably, their phenolics and esters finely matched.

Finally, minus the milliliters of whisky that had been carefully syringed out through their corks, the original bottles were returned from Scotland to the Shackleton expedition's hut, where they have been re-situated as part of the preserved environ by the Antarctic Heritage Trust.

For the complete details of the analysis of the Mackinlay whisky, a copy of the paper published by Dr. Pryde et al in the Journal of the Institute of Brewing is available here.

32 Comments

i love drinking

One question? Why did they put the bottles which were not supposed to be there in the first case back again??

Midoman, your comment is the joy of being anonymous on this website and a confessing drunk.

If only Lindsay Lohan would create a login now and share with us.

I do wish good things for you and good health!

..........................................
See life in all its beautiful colors, and
from different perspectives too!

Don't Drink and Post. :D

I have a hard time thinking they spend the time and money just to ship a couple of bottles back to Antartica. I'm pretty sure no one will miss a few bottles there.

Science always asks "can we," but doesn't seem to ask "should we."

They had to replace the bottles because the Antarctic Heritage Trust was founded long after this expedition 9New Zealand in 1987 and UK in 1993) so they had to return it due to the face it was already there when the Trust was made.

**(New Zealand in 1987 and UK in 1993)** , **...due to the fact...**

What If they found a lost nuclear weapon there? (Oh well its already been here for a while... Its gotta stay you know.)

Do they actually think of what, 'naturally' was there?
I mean, all the effort to return whiskey bottles? Its more for show in the Shackleton Hut I bet!

not sure you understand how serious the scotts take their whiskey

@Delkomatic, Lets rather argue about German Beer, that's more my territory. :)

I shall buy myself a bottle.

Thanks' PopSci.

Impressive. Talk about Pryde in your work.
If there are alcohol awards they deserve one.

of course there are alcohol awards, alcohol saved our collective buts when we were still too primitive to know that drinking water out of ponds was a bad idea. it tastes alright once you get used to it, and it's an industry that i can actually say doesn't stand a chance of ever dying. that in itself deserves a reward. here's to you alcohol, may you be enjoyed in a respectful moderation.

to mars or bust!

@Rg-5
I do love some German beer...can't stand this water done stuff we make in America

If you find it someplace, buy yourself a bottle of Namibian Tafel Lager or Draught. I kinda like it, won many awards in Germany.

The point is - nobody is going to go down there and see if they actually returned it. That scotch is probably sitting on Bill Gates bar right now.

I bought one! Its kinda nice, but beware, this stuff is old school.

Asa ASAsArtWoRKs

they had me sold,until they said they just use existing stock to blend this ,err,replica? sad they can't distill a true batch.

Now all i think of is "sales hype"

This is a fascinating article, including the extraordinary sensory map. The comments, for the most part,* show no respect for the excellent work PopSci does, and really, no hint of intelligence. Depressing.

On the other hand, as enjoyable as it was to read about, I remain skeptical of the whole enterprise. Perhaps the science is good, perhaps not -- but I would like to know what sort of scientific foundation there is for the claim of the mythical "prodigious nose," upon which this exercise largely depends.

*exceptions Guapo, killer T & moon~

kolonelpanik,
It is my belief the end result of this science is towards Marketing and to put a label on a bottle of old Synthetic Scott in claiming it has the age old flavor of a really old time and boost profits of said sold Scott.

You see science. I see Marketing and higher profits!

..........................................
See life in all its beautiful colors, and
from different perspectives too!

Space, I agree with what you've written, but you do cite "(the end result of)'science')" -- which implies that science was done. Perhaps it's silly science, put to silly use, but if the utility is what it's all about, and that utility is to sell Scotch, then we certainly agree. However, I did note my skepticism about the science itself -- please see last paragraph.

Furthermore, skepticism should go both ways. For all I know, this research is related to the canine olfactory system's alleged ability to detect certain cancers.

Finally, one might infer that a little bit of Job Creation has been committed, all over the world. AFAIK, Scotch gets shipped and retailed just about everywhere.

kolonelpanik,
You point of views and responses are like-able and useful information.

..........................................
See life in all its beautiful colors, and
from different perspectives too!

Usefull? nevermind... Talking many words with little content isn't usefull... Scotch isn't 'usefull'...

Ok, I'm not being 'usefull' with this either... :D

@rg-5, your contribution to the discussion of the article was to unilaterally change the subject to German beer, and then a little later claim "I bought one!" and then you offered your critique "kinda nice" but "old school." Who knows what you bought, (beer, Scotch?), or what those tasting notes mean?

I don't require what I read to be useful in the sense you seem to be using (and misspelling)the term, but Scotch... well, you're a brave man to say it isn't useful.

I'd like to add a few more words here, just to annoy you with more useless content, so I'll say thank you to @Space. Wait, sorry, maybe that was useful after all.

lol

george wilberg-Returned the whiskey to the hut in the Artic? Waste of "damn" fine whiskey and at 47% alchohol durn close to 94 proof. Wow must have given those pioneers a real "kick" to keep going to the pole......

my roomate's aunt makes $83/hr on the laptop. She has been without work for 8 months but last month her pay was $8682 just working on the laptop for a few hours. Read more on this site...Nuttyrich . com

@poo789:

The article is about whiskey, not koolaid.

maybe it's just me, but, i'll take a 15+ year old single-malt over a hundred year old blend any day

I was reading your magazine in the bathroom just now and was inspired to write something about your claims of '500 miles south of the north pole'

this direction is ambiguious, since south is either a circle of points or 'any direction' from specifically the north pole, no additional spot was defined near it (could be magnetic vs. true ? ) , and typically south does never refer to the shortest 3d line to that point at the bottom of the world relative to external gravitational forces causing the solar alignment plane. (i also have a blog.) ps. figure 8 moon shippiing route efficient ?


138 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.

Innovation Challenges



Popular Science+ For iPad

Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page



Download Our App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed


March 2012: The Future of Medicine

A 10,000-rpm, no-pulse heart is completely revolutionizing how we think about transplants. Plus: rapid-response virus hunters, a shocking cure for migraines, the world's youngest person to have achieved nuclear fusion (in his parents' garage!), and much more.


circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif
bmxmag-ps