What Could Possibly Go Wrong?
Genetically engineered mosquitoes could even spread genes to other insects

Fever Dream Critics worry that genetically engineering mosquitoes and releasing them into the wild—one proposed method for controlling the spread of malaria and other diseases —could cause those diseases to become more virulent Jamie Sneddon

As carriers for diseases such as malaria, dengue fever and yellow fever, mosquitoes are the deadliest creatures on the planet, responsible for millions of human deaths every year. And as the planet warms, the insects are broadly expanding their turf and bringing their diseases with them; thousands of cases of dengue, a tropical disease, have appeared in the U.S. in the past five years. DDT was long used to control the mosquito population, but it is now widely banned, and in any case, many scientists believe that mosquitoes quickly build up a resistance to the insecticide. That, in part, is why the battle against mosquitoes has gone genetic.

Generally speaking, the goal of gene-based mosquito-control projects is either to kill the insects or make them benign. Researchers at Johns Hopkins University, for example, are studying mosquitoes that were made malaria-resistant through the activation of a gene responsible for a protein that blocks the infection. And the British company Oxitec has engineered a strain of mosquito that cannot survive without regular doses of tetracycline; in the wild, these mosquitoes would survive just long enough to mate and pass on their tetracycline-junkie genes to their doomed offspring. In a trial in the Cayman Islands last year, Oxitec-modified mosquitoes were able to cut the overall population by 80 percent in just six months.

But the problem is that we don’t fully understand how mosquitoes and the diseases they carry would adapt in response to such experiments. New strains of malaria and other diseases could emerge. Jo Lines, a malaria expert at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine has described the process as “a series of arms races that the [malaria] parasite has consistently won.” Three percent of the offspring from Oxitec’s tetracycline-dependent mosquitoes survive—what happens if those bugs breed with wild mosquitoes?

It’s even possible that the changes we induce in mosquitoes could move into other animals. Horizontal gene transfer could result in midges, gnats and black flies developing the same mutations, including the unfortunate characteristic of dying shortly after hatching—and a mass die-off of insects that provide sustenance to birds, bats, frogs and fish would be a food-chain disaster.

How We Can Do Better

Joe Conlon, a technical adviser for the American Mosquito Control Association, favors using a variety of techniques all at once—dispersing larvicide, which is less environmentally harmful than pesticides that kill adults; planting Ovitraps, which attract egg-laying females; and, where possible, getting rid of the water impoundments where the insects breed.

Also, What Could Possibly Go Wrong with

6 Comments

could it cause the population to become larger? since they have short lifespans etc they breed large numbers, what if that birthrate tripled?

Joe Conlon's technique seems sound, practical and as environmentally friendly as possible. What is the problem with moving forward with his ideas?

We should keep in mind that 'every time we mess with nature, nature messes with us'.

There is even another project about a mosquito engineered to provide immunity against leishmaniosis. Look it up,it's called "Flying vaccinator"; it's so crazy it might even work.

And by the way, can we stop thinking about "nature" like it's something basically good and that shouldn't be tampered with? The first assumption is wrong and the second outdated.

It'd be fun to see Monsanto try and patent mosquitoes and then sue Africa for stealing its intellectual property.

Nobody's obviously thinking about "nature" like it's something basically good, since this is about fighting the "evil" malaria

Nature shouldn't be tampered with until you know precisely what you're doing. There are countless examples of tampering with nature that have gone awfully wrong, such as releasing snakes that were supposed to eat rats, but ended up eating the eggs from bird's nests, exterminating all of them. That happened in the island of Guam. The rats, by the way, are still there.

There have been efforts to control entire species, for example the screwfly using SIT (Sterile Insect Technique), which while effective, have not completely eradicated the screwfly from the world.

It is important to note that the American Mosquito Control Association is a respected organization which is made up of mosquito control entities as well as vendors who sell chemicals and biological control substances. This fact makes it difficult for the AMCA to give a completely unbiased opinion on this particular matter because those vendors and industry representatives would stand to lose a great deal if chemicals were no longer needed. See mosquito.org for more information on the AMCA.

I am neither for or against genetic modification, I think the jury is still out as to its effectiveness in areas other than islands. I do think that this article is flawed in its approach to questioning the technique by throwing out the old scare tactics of genetic manipulation.



June 2013: American Energy Independence

Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email

Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email

circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif
bmxmag-ps