Grass-Fed Beef BinaryApe via Flickr

Foodies want to know everything about their animal-based dishes these days — where the meat came from, what it ate, what its name was. OK, maybe not that last part. But there is a big difference between industrial cattle farms and grass-fed meat — both in price and in nutritional considerations.

We’ve already seen how chemistry can help monitor the source of your meals, ensuring that you don’t eat endangered species. Now you can tell what your beef ate before it reached your plate.

A group of chemists from Ireland figured out a way to reconstruct the diet of cattle, determining whether they spent their days munching fresh pasture grasses rather than barley or silage. Frank J. Monahan and colleagues studied the proportions of stable isotopes of oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen and sulfur found in the muscle tissue and tail hair of Irish beef cattle. They were able to determine what the animals primarily ate, and in some cases, could even figure out where the animals came from.

Certain diets yielded a distinctive signature, the researchers report in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. They couldn’t tell between animals that ate from a pasture and those that ate grass silage, but there were clear differences between animals that ate pasture grass and those that ate concentrated food products. Using hair and tail samples, they could even follow changes in an animal’s diet over the course of its lifetime. The researchers could tell whether a steer had switched from a grass diet to a corn-based diet near the end of its life, for instance.

Monitoring animals’ tail hair yielded such precise information about diet that it could be used to monitor farms’ production practices, the authors say.

Stable isotope ratios have also been used to determine the source of bottled drinks, and figure out where people have been based on chemicals left behind in their hair.

Speaking of soft drinks, chemists also announced this week that they're using protein analysis to test for kola nuts, a pricey ingredient found in natural cola drinks. Drinks containing the kola nut had the signature of plant proteins, while Coca Cola — which does not claim to use the kola nut — did not.

Testing methods like these could give consumers assurances that they really are getting what they pay for.

[Eurekalert]

2 Comments

Knowing what you are paying for is a good thing, and knowing that you are paying for something you are not getting is even better. Knowing what your food ate, I don't think I'd really care, just as long as it wasn't something hazardous.

The meat/veggie issue will arise I'm sure, so let me lay out my opinion. I don't care if it's meat or not, if it has the same taste and texture and cooking properties, doesn't matter to me what it's made of. I've had chicken nuggets made with fungus that looked, smelled and tasted like chicken nuggets. Enough so that it fooled a hard and fast "will never eat fake food" friend of mine, I let him eat some.. then after he was done commenting on how good they were and asking me where to get some, I showed him what he ate. He was floored.

Well.. after all.. Soylent Green is made from people!

One time, I ate vegetable fed beef, and it was amazing in flavour, I couldn't believe the difference, it was so sweet and juicy. But I prefer tuna.



June 2013: American Energy Independence

Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email

Contributing Writers:

Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email

circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif
bmxmag-ps