Headless Flies These decapitated fruit flies were able to respond to optical stimulation because their exposed neurons had been genetically modified to react to light. Cell

Ambitious researchers think they might be able to map the human brain in just five years, navigating the complex networks between neurons by using advanced images. An Austrian scientist has another idea: Work backward by manipulating neurons to figure out what they do. To accomplish this, Gero Miesenboeck and his grad students are engaging in optical mind control, implanting fruit flies with false memories and causing them to learn from mistakes they never made. They’re also continuing their pioneering research into flying decapitated fruit flies.

In a newly released video from this year’s TED conference, Miesenboeck, a professor at Oxford, explains his pioneering work in the field of optogenetics, which involves genetically modifying nerve cells to react to light. Pulsing lasers at modified neurons mimics a brain impulse, allowing Miesenboeck and his colleagues to study what happens next.

As he explains in the video below, the flies’ neurons were modified to develop light-sensitive “pores,” which open when exposed to light. The opened pore allows electrical current to flow, and the neuron fires an electrical impulse. Others have used optogenetics to make fruit flies smell bananas when they see blue light, for instance.


It even works with brainless flies — Miesenboeck’s former graduate student, Susana Lima, lopped off optogenetically modified flies’ heads and stimulated the fly equivalent of the spinal cord with a laser pulse. The headless flies flew, meaning Miesenboeck and Lima were able to remotely control brainless flies by simulating a brain impulse.

The headless fly research was first published five years ago, and since then, scientists have come a long way, Miesenboeck says — they can now interfere with the animals’ psychology. His interpretation of psychology involves an “actor,” the brain’s decision-making center, and a “critic,” which continually provides commentary on the actor’s decisions.

“You can think of this nagging inner voice as the brain's equivalent of the Catholic Church, if you’re an Austrian like me ... or your mother, if you’re Jewish,” Miesenboeck says.
Following this logic, Miesenboeck figures the cells that make up the “critic” are a key ingredient in intelligence. He figured if he could identify the critic cells and modify them, he could artificially nag the actor cell cluster into changing its behavior. So the fly should learn from mistakes that it thought it had made, which in reality it had not, he explains.

Drosophilia Superego: A cluster of 12 neurons, shown in green, makes up a fruit fly’s “critic” center, or the superego in Freudian psychology.  via TED

In one series of experiments, he caused a fruit fly to "remember" to avoid a certain smell as it flew around. Through various fly-behavior experiments, Miesenboeck narrowed down the critic center to a clump of just 12 cells. This knowledge can lead neurologists and psychologists to a much greater understanding of the physiological networks that drive behavior. Much more work remains to be done — for instance, no one has yet figured out how the critic cells actually work — but it’s exciting, promising work.

“I find it exhilarating to see how vague psychological notions evaporate and give rise to a physical, mechanistic understanding of the mind — even if it’s the mind of a fly,” Miesenboeck says.


14 Comments

This research goes hand in hand with the research in cognitive computing. The more we learn in this domain the more we can figure out how to make computers think like us.

This science research is pretty much the start of the ideas they explored in the TV show Dollhouse. Science has brought us many positive things, but this could get scary...

Fell asleep, reading this, after eating nachos (true!)...

... Just woke up from a really bad dream ...

... (Ichabod Goldblum!)

... OK, I made that last part up.

“I find it exhilarating to see how vague psychological notions evaporate and give rise to a physical, mechanistic understanding of the mind"

This. Psychology is not science. The brain is an organ just like your heart. The heart just happens to be a lot more simplistic than the brain. Soon we'll know the biochemical and mechanical reason behind our every thought. .

Look at all the ads in the comments. This is ridiculous.

Look at all the ads in the comments. This is ridiculous.

yeah. these adds are getting out of control. I was going to leave a meaningfull comment but I am starting to getting really steamed about this. I just told one user to calm down about complaining about these adds, but 1 week later we see 10 adds in EVERY article. Come on popsci. there are 100 million things you could do. write a better spam filter would be top of my list.

Of course psychology is science.
Not "hard" science like physics or chemistry, but more along the lines of social science like history or politics.

FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS HOLY!!! GET RID OF THESE GOD$%^# SPAMMERS!!!

Interesting stuff. Their process is kind of how the machines figured out how human minds work in the Animatrix. They poked and prodded the brain until they got the desired responses. Trial and error. Makes me wonder how long before we can get a remote controlled dog? Dog won't go outside? Use the remote! Or, this could could eventually be developed for behavior modification or learning. If someone breaks the law, upload philosophy, logic, and ethics into his brain while he's in the clink! Or, get a 4 year degree in a 4 hour download! Nice!



July 2013: The Future Of Flight

The incredible innovations, like drone swarms and perpetual flight, bringing aviation into the world of tomorrow. Plus: today's greatest sci-fi writers predict the future, the science behind the summer's biggest blockbusters, a Doctor Who-themed DIY 'bot, the organs you can do without, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email

Contributing Writers:

Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email

circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif