
Name: Ting Xu
Age: 35
Affiliation: University of California, Berkeley
Last fall, Ting Xu, a professor of materials science at the University of California at Berkeley, was suffering from headaches so severe that doctors worried she might have a brain tumor. But one neurologist suggested a simpler cause. How about cutting back on the 16-hour days in the lab, sleeping, and maybe even eating at normal times?
Xu has since eased her work schedule, but she’s no less productive. Earlier this year she co-authored a paper describing a new technique for coaxing tiny polymer strands to self-assemble into 10 trillion cylinders with precise patterns. The method could lead to discs the size of a quarter that store 175 DVDs’—7 terabits—worth of data. Then she tweaked the technique so it could be used to build a range of nanoparticle-based devices—super-efficient photovoltaic cells and energy storage systems, and higher-resolution flexible displays. Xu is smart, diligent and knowledgeable, says polymer physicist Thomas Russell of the University of Massachusetts, but more important,“she has imagination.”
And a youthful one at that. She loves the Transformers. She’s a devotee of Tom and Jerry—watching the warring cat-and-mouse duo helps her think. Like her cartoon heroes, Xu, a native of China, has always been restless. She played volleyball and ran track growing up, but neither wore her out. Her father would offer to boost her allowance if she could sit for more than 15 minutes at a time. He never had to pay, and that energy continues to drive her today.
After reporting on the self-assembly method, which she created with Russell, Xu immediately saw greater potential. The strands, she realized, could serve as minuscule cranes to arrange even smaller building materials and manufacture things like ultrasmall electronic devices and paper-thin, printable solar cells. In her most recent work, Xu combined the self-assembling polymers with nanoscopic particles. By forcing these particles to assume the underlying order of the polymers, she managed to get trillions of them to line up exactly as she wanted.
Xu hopes the work will give solar cells a competitive advantage over fossil fuels, for one thing, but she won’t be resting in the meantime. She’s constantly hunting for new ideas and designing experiments with the hope of surprising herself, not just confirming existing theories. “It’s important to think about science in a perpendicular way, not a parallel way,” she says. “Otherwise you end up painting other people’s houses.” —Gregory Mone
single pageFive amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
I enjoyed the article, but was disappointed at first, because whomever posted (or wrote) it, did not bother to proof read it. The subject person featured, is introduced as "Michael Strand (also under the photo), but the whole article is about Michael Strano. I assume, for research purposes, the latter is accurate.
I know how!
When I was litle saw Star Wars too, but I was impress from the flying machines and now I'm able to make "Snow-Speeder" for example!!! And I have some ideas for new materials and way for fly including revolutionary engines...
Need only MONEY!!!
Lextir: These are called "typos" in the language of writers. "Typo" stands for typographical error. Errors are often defined as "common mistakes". Mistaking the name Strano for Strand by someone writing headings and captions, (as opposed to the individual who wrote the report and, hopefully, did research sufficient to get the subject's name right) is not impossible. They are similar, and Strand is somewhat more common that Strano. Nor does it require an arrogant and supercilious response. Somebody made a mistake. We humans, most of the rest of us being mere mortals, do that on occasion.
Lextir, Observer is right. It was probably a typo. An example of poor proofing was kindly provided by Observer when he said, "We humans, most of the rest of us being mere mortals, do that on occasion."
If proofed, that statement would have benefited from hyphens rather than the use of commas to express his thoughts.
Well, typos aside, I enjoyed it. As a university teacher of writing and myself a writer, I can observe that the choice in the instance cited between commas and hyphens is a toin coss, really; not all rules of punctuation and grammar were written on the backside of the 10 Commandments, after all! ;-) A little individual choice is stilly permissable, even in, say, the MLW Stylesheet and the Chicago Manual of Style.
While realizing these young people are genuinely exceptional, they do provide encouragement that not *all* of us are lazy sloths (as I tend to be, so I'm looking in the mirror!).
Part of the excitement about the areas in which these folks are working is that any of those areas could yield applicable results in the wider world at lightening speed. (Of course, it may turn out that none of them work out for years or decades to come, or maybe not at all.)
But consider something I read online just yesterday: about 10 of today's better work fields didn't EXIST -- just six years ago. (No, I didn't do the research to verify that.)
Then there's the exponential growth in knowledge; call it "Moore's Law Writ Large," if you will. A desktop computer I bought in 1997 had more processing power than the entire Mission Control in Houston had when we landed the first men on the Moon -- and that's from NASA, which happened to have an article using my exact computer as a comparison, not from the manufacturer. And that's stunning.
Further, the people who are the subjects of this article will undoubtedly inspire even younger young, bright sparks who will light their own torches.
Sigh. Who am I to talk? MLA Stylesheet, not MLW!!!
I wish these fascinating articles would have more detail such as components of the robot and what the robot in the picture can actually do.
Me too. Unfortunately this site is more about making money, and itwould cost more to hire competent writers that are willing to flesh out a story with facts, pictures (useful ones not taken by Vinny), and explanations. Yes it is harder than regurgitating facts, but it is what people come here to read.
Well if you're not happy you can always see somewhere else, and create a website with "really good" informations. Or maybe you can see this website just as an introduction that should encourage you to look further in details in what interests you.
Daniel.
www.scrabblecheat.org
I'm glad to see the 'typo' on Strano's name has been corrected!
Thing is, I don't think it's just a 'typo' if you get someones name wrong. Especially if the article is about people. Detracts slightly from the fact that you are introducing people to us if you get their name wrong.
All water under the bridge now though, I guess.
Strano's work though sounds superb.
www.faqmyjob.co.uk | www.proviser.com | www.faqmyjob.com | www.conakat.com
Excellent read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing a little research on that. And he actually bought me lunch because I found it for him smile So let me rephrase that: Thanks for lunch!
tax accounting|Weight Loss Women
I am afraid that robots may rule humans as in the film Transformer ! :) Much happy to know. All the best to these three brilliant stars !
Regards
Articles
Looks like we have some really brilliant people. This is a very informative article i'll follow up their work closely. These will be the people who will shape our future.
| Written by Dimitri from Eat Healthier Foods |
Very interesting! And really there are a lot of such people who thunk that they are not scientists and are not able to make some discoveries. But is fact they could be important people for the human's life!
No offense to the females, but am I the only one who are surprised to see this many women among those 10?
Considering how many women work in this industri compared to men it's really well done. My favorite would have to be John Rinn though, I really hope he managed to solve some of the stuff with DNA degeneration over time.
Regards,
C.Potty
thats the amazing bridge.especially bridge with sensors usually only track seismic activity, thats expensive as far as i know.Honda Generator | Onan Generator | Coleman Powermate Generator
Very interesting! And really there are a lot of such people who thunk that they are not scientists and are not able to make some discoveries. But is fact they could be important people for the human's life..
Evail
http://burnwiigames.org
I love to see the next generation of inventors and scientists showing off their stuff. It gives me hope and the realization that we are still just scratching the surface of human ingenuity! :)
Mike
www.etermlifeinsurance.net
Thing is, I don't think it's just a 'typo' if you get someones name wrong. Especially if the article is about people. Detracts slightly from the fact that you are introducing people to us if you get their name wrong.
http://www.egovernmentjobs.in/category/government-jobs-iii/
It would be great to finally develop software to avoid other types of tragedies. Good luck for the future. www.mts-bw.de + www.edvlab.de
Excellent read, thanks.
www.parienligne.fr
I wonder these people will change the way we think, work and eat. I guess there would be a time when you can order anything, a robot will follow you. if you have anybody organ malfunctioning, then no worries, just have bucks. They will solve any problem. I guess where are we heading.....
www.promdresspicture.com
لقد استمتعت المقالة ، لكن خاب في البداية ، لأن أيا النشر (أو كتب) أنه لم يكلف نفسه عناء إثبات قراءتها. هو عرض الشخص الموضوع المميز ، كما مايكل ستراند "(أيضا في إطار الصورة) ، إلا أن هذه المادة كلها حول سترانو مايكل. أفترض ، لأغراض البحث ، وهذا الأخير دقيقة.
http://www.autonewstoday.net
Excellent read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing a little research on that. And he actually bought me lunch because I found it for him smile So let me rephrase that: Thanks for lunch!
tax accounting|Weight Loss Women
www.tran33m.com/vb/
Lextir: Dessa kallas "stavfel" på det språk som författare. "Stavfel" står för skrivfel. Fel definieras ofta som "vanliga misstag". Miste på namnet Strano för Strand av någon att skriva rubriker och bildtexter, (i motsats till den person som skrev rapporten och, förhoppningsvis, gjorde efterforskningar tillräckligt för att få en persons namn till höger) är inte omöjligt. De är liknande, och Strand är något vanligare att Strano. Inte heller behöver det en arrogant och överlägset svar. Någon gjorde ett misstag. Vi människor, de flesta av oss andra är vanliga dödliga, göra det ibland.
www.car-area.com
www.carnews.biz
www.carsite.biz
www.thaicarnews.com
Molto interessante! E in realtà ci sono un sacco di queste persone che thunk che non sono scienziati e non sono in grado di fare alcune scoperte. Ma è un fatto che potrebbero essere persone importanti per la vita dell'essere umano!
www.top-wedding-dresses.net
www.wedding-todays.com
www.wedding18idea.com
www.thaicarnews.com
Mi piace vedere la prossima generazione di inventori e scienziati in mostra la loro roba. E mi dà speranza e la consapevolezza che siamo ancora solo l'inizio di ingegno umano!
www.wedding4teen.com
www.weddingexe.com
www.wedding4what.com
www.thaicarnews.com