Supercomputer An IBM Blue Gene/P supercomputer rack. Wikimedia Commons

If you could put all the data in the world onto CDs and stack them up, the pile would stretch from the Earth to beyond the moon, according to a new study. The world’s technological infrastructure has a staggering capacity to store and process information, reaching 295 exabytes in 2007, a reflection of the world’s almost complete transition into the digital realm. That's a number with 20 zeroes behind it, in case you're wondering.

Martin Hilbert and Priscila López took on the unenviable task of figuring out how much information is out there, and how its storage and processing have changed over time. Some of their findings seem obvious, like the fact that Internet and phone networks have grown at quite a clip (28 percent per year), while TV and radio grew much more slowly. But others are more surprising, like the nugget that 75 percent of the world’s stored information was still in analog format in 2000, mostly in the form of video cassettes. By 2007, 94 percent of the world’s info was digital.

In 2007, all the general-purpose computers in the world computed 6.4 x 1018 instructions per second, according to the study. Doing this by hand would take 2,200 times the period since the Big Bang.

In 1986, the first year the team examined, 41 percent of all computations were still done by calculator, the researchers found. By 2000, personal computers were doing 86 percent of the computing; by 2007, video game hardware accounted for 25 percent of the work. On the whole, gaming consoles have more computing power than the world’s supercomputers, the study found.

Cell phones are catching up, too — they accounted for 6 percent of all computing in 2007. It’s worth noting that’s the year the first iPhone debuted, and a year before anyone could buy a mass-market Android phone, so it’s a fair guess this number has increased exponentially since then.

Hilbert and López surveyed more than 1,000 sources and sifted through an incredibly thorough 60 categories of analog and digital technologies, from paper to vinyl records to Blu-ray discs. In all, they say the world was able to store 295 trillion optimally compressed megabytes; communicate almost 2 quadrillion megabytes; and carry out 6.4 trillion MIPS (million instructions per second) on general-purpose computers.

If you sympathize, and feel a bit overloaded as this work week ends, remember that in the grand scheme of information, this is but a speck. It’s still smaller than the number of bits stored in all the DNA molecules of a single human adult, the authors say.

“To put our findings in perspective, the 6.4 x 1018 instructions per second that humankind can carry out on its general-purpose computers in 2007 are in the same ballpark area as the maximum number of nerve impulses executed by one human brain per second,” Hilbert and Lopez write.

Feeling smart now?

13 Comments

Are our computers getting smarter or are we just getting dumber?

Yes.

I am getting a lot smarter but I'm getting a lot older so I can't remember what I learned.

Does this mean that skynet has reached the tipping point and could become self aware any day now?

...and the Library of Congress is Equivalent to One Raccoon Brain.

I'm so tired of the Skynet references, the Star Trek references, the Star Wars references... talk about being stuck in a rut.

So when will the Seagate 1 Exabyte external drive be available?

well, you could get one right now for about $50,000,000.00, it will be very heavy though, comprised of 525,000 2TB Seagate external hard drives, which run about $90 each. but we'll need a computer to tell us how to RAID 525,000 hard drives because we're getting dumber. this Exabyte external drive will be superior to the others because the others will only use 524,288 2TB hard drives, advertising as 1 048 576 TB but you will be missing some TB that way. my strategy is to overshoot, offering 722 more 2TB hard drives to make up for those lost in translation from 1000 to 1024. they'd actually give you 943718.4TB, 525,000 drives would make it 945000, so you'd actually need more like 582,543 2TB hard drives to make what i would call an exabyte, instead of buying a 2TB drive and finding that it's actually 1.8TB. now convert that to weight.

so that will cost you $52,428,800

What about the Hydrofloracarbon bypass valve ????

Nanospecs
Same lousy content, too.

295 Exabytes in my brain? Sure doesn't feel like it. I think some of that info has been moved beyond my motherboards memory range and can't recall it.

On December 21, 2012, Google will become self-aware. :)



June 2013: American Energy Independence

Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email

Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email

circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif