
Stauch, a confirmed whiz who in high school got a perfect 2400 on his SAT while fighting bronchitis, was inspired. It was an innovative technique, reaching inside buyers' skulls to see what they thought before products even hit the shelves. So he started combing through something like 150 peer-reviewed neuroscience articles. A year later, he founded NeuroSpire, a Durham, North Carolina-based business that gives marketing companies everything they need to conduct their own brain scan-based marketing tests. "Somebody with no training whatsoever could be set up in minutes to run a brain imaging research study," he says. The guesswork of advertising is turned into numbers that purport to help companies get a window into consumers' heads: to see if They'll buy it, or They won't. That might help explain why ad agencies such as McKinney--which counts Samsung and Sherwin-Williams among its clients--have signed up for NeuroSpire, despite that the scientific merits of such services remain murky.
Neuromarketing is the science of determining what customers like not by asking them--ads work subconsciously, so what do consumers know about what they want?--but by hooking them up to a brain scanner and seeing exactly what the lizard-y parts of our brain are hungry for.
That field has exploded in recent years, growing even since Stauch, who dropped out of Duke in 2012 to focus on his business, founded NeuroSpire. Big corporations, after all, are interested in knowing if neuromarketing works and, if it does, how to take advantage of it. Google, Disney, and plenty of others have used neuromarketing, and the idea is still in its infancy. (One heavily cited study from 2007: "What is ‘neuromarketing’? A discussion and agenda for future research.")
But there are some problems: For one thing, academics and scientists still debate the merits of the science. In 2004, a Nature Neuroscience editorial called neuroscience-based marketing "a highly speculative investment" for companies. It went on:
One of the biggest problems is: how do you know that what you're measuring in a lab has any equivalent in the real world? Yes, a screen lit up when those subjects looked at pictures of Godiva chocolate, but that doesn't necessarily mean they'll go out in the world and buy Godiva chocolate.
Still plenty of companies are willing to suspend disbelief for what they see as a useful, quantitative approach to market testing. But then they often smack into another big problem: neuromarketing is almost prohibitively expensive to conduct unless you're a huge corporation with cash to burn. Your options are as follows: a.) buy equipment, potentially for thousands of dollars, and staff a technician who can run trials, or b.) hire a company to come in, set up the machinery, and conduct the research for thousands of dollars. If you're running a multi-million-dollar ad campaign that hinges on the thoughts of a few key demographics, maybe that's worth the expense. For most, especially with the science still in its early stages, it probably isn't.
That's where Stauch, 22, comes in. His startup turns neuromarketing into a DIY affair. How it works: A company or marketing firm buys an Emotiv EEG Neuroheadset—a popular open-source brain-scanning headset--that NeuroSpire pre-programs with a custom EEG test. (Stauch developed the test with a business partner in the Netherlands, Jeroen Kools.) Marketers stick the headset on a test subject and ask his opinion on the ad or packaging design in question. Lights on the headset flash when a good brain signal is being picked up.
During the test, the marketers can open a NeuroSpire application on just about any computer to see that the brain waves are in fact being picked up. But that’s where their involvement ends. The raw data gets beamed back to Stauch and the NeuroSpire team for translation. Before getting crunched, the numbers look like a faulty GPS puked longitudes and latitudes onto an Excel document. NeuroSpire gives options after that: a company or agency can pay for anything from a "score" that shows how well the ad or design did to a full-blown 30-page report that includes second-by-second reactions.
Whichever option the marketers choose, they end up paying less than they would if they took a more traditional route. A single fMRI study might cost a company between $100,000 and $200,000. An EEG study might cost between $40,000 and $60,000. Because NeuroSpire eliminates the complicated equipment and staff required of standard neuromarketing tests, it can do an EEG test for about $5,000.
Getting the company off the ground wasn’t easy. After a brief spell conducting traditional neuromarketing tests, NeuroSpire relaunched in the form in which it exists today. Stauch and his colleagues entered a start-up seed-funding contest called Start-Up Madness, which pits companies founded by graduates of ACC conference teams against each other. NeuroSpire won the contest, and got $5,000 in starter money.
After that, Stauch started cold-calling companies to give them the pitch. NeuroSpire didn’t have a PR or official business arm, but before long, companies he hadn’t already called started reaching out to him, about once a month at first, then more often.

The Durham, North Carolina-based ad agency McKinney has tried out NeuroSpire’s service while working on campaigns for "a couple" of brands in different categories. Chris Walsh, vice president and director of consumer and business insight at McKinney, heard about NeuroSpire through a colleague, another Duke student, and started working with Stauch. Walsh and the McKinney team tested a campaign—they wouldn’t say for which company--first through the headset, then a traditional survey, and later through an online survey. What they've found, in limited use, is that the results from NeuroSpire have matched up with results from the more traditional techniques. Either an ad is leaving an impression--"driving emotional responses," Walsh says--or it's not. And if it's not, McKinney has corrected course based on that information.

That still doesn’t tell us if consumers then went out and bought whatever was being advertised. But such are the risks of marketing research. Surveys and focus groups alone have their own limitations. If the barrier to entry is low enough in neuromarketing, and the corporation looking for data is big enough, then it could be worthwhile for the corporation to take the chance anyway. That's what NeuroSpire represents: a chance for companies--even some smaller ones--to get in on the science of neuromarketing, shaky though it may be.
I asked Stauch, in a sort of acrobatic, confirm-or-deny FBI way, if I might see the brands NeuroSpire works with when I walk down the street. In other words, if we, the public, know them. He told me, "Yes. Definitely."
The brands are doing their best to get to know us, too.
140 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.
Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
For our annual How It Works issue, we break down everything from the massive Falcon Heavy rocket to a tiny DNA sequencer that connects to a USB port. We also take a look at an ambitious plan for faster-than-light travel and dive into the billion-dollar science of dog food.
Plus the latest Legos, Cadillac's plug-in hybrid, a tractor built for the apocalypse, and more.

Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor:Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
Interesting, but the big question on everyone's minds is, how many times did he take the SAT to get a 2400? Apparently more than once. I know someone who was the only teen in the state to get a perfect score on the ACT that year...on his 11th try.
I also know someone who didn't get 2400 on his SAT, dropped out of college at 20 and started a software company...and became the richest man on earth.
Once. Jake took it once. He's sitting right next to me. You can google it!
Yes, I'm a close family friend and Jake took the SAT once!
Brilliant mind and we are so proud of his accomplishments! Go Jake!
He could use his brilliance for so much better than this.
Chutzpah, why are you assuming that this invention will be Jakes ONLY project. Those individuals who are considered 'brilliant' rarely have only one iron in the fire.
Everybody has to start somewhere.
USA language is "Engslangish" and just keeps getting worse, lol.
oh hum.... posted in the wrong place.... sigh.
Odd, when I post in the correct article, I am not prompted with the message "SPAM FILTER enter CAPTCHA", go figure?
Now they try to read our minds with ever increasing accuracy, in the future they'll try to change our thoughts to influence our tastes, people may have to use special helmets out on the street so as to not be influenced by all the brainwave generators that try to read and also change our mind.
Jake, you sound like a very brilliant young man; we sure need more young entrepreneurs who are creative. I took the SAT when it was a maximum 1600...and certainly never aced it, so that dates me a little! I think this technology would be beneficial for getting 'into the heads' of people for measuring potential for any violence or criminal tendencies. Perhaps even as a way to scan people in a non-harmful way at airport checkpoints to see if they fit a 'terrorist brainwave pattern' or some such way of measuring propensity to harm others. So Jake, I hope you have much success and will discover multiple applications for your brilliant methodology!
This marketing scheme suffers from the same fundamental flaw that all marketing/advertising concepts suffer from. The test subjects used all have the similar personality traits that make them susceptible to the concepts used by advertisers.
The entire marketing and advertising business is composed of marketing executives that are stupid enough to believe what the advertising executives are telling them about how effective the tens of billions spent each year on advertising actually are.
The fact of the matter is that almost all advertising spending is a waste of money. Consider the case of Ferrari, they spend nothing on advertising, yet they are the most profitable car company in the world.
Let's face it, when you're smart enough, the SAT and ACT are a joke. What makes it hard is that you learned the stuff back in 5th grade and it's difficult to remember. Getting a perfect score on the ACT is easier than on the SAT in my opinion, although I just link it to a matter of studying and being familiar with the material, since the material is quite easy. As far as this company goes, I'm really excited and worried at the same time. Taking advantage of the subconscious seems unfair to the customer but it also may produce better ad targeting which is something I'm very much for.
The SAT score issue I brought up has nothing to do with NeuroSpire and the fascinating use of the Neuroheadset. It was sort of a joke gone awry. Jake is clearly a bright and accomplished young man and a perfect score on the SAT is a remarkable achievement.
I misread a statement by Jake in an article in the Post and Courier and wrongly assumed he'd taken the test more than once already (as did the teenager I knew):
"I wanted a perfect score, and I told myself I'd take the SAT a few different times to see how close I could get," Jake said. "But I did not think I got it on this one."
http://www.postandcourier.com/article/20080221/PC1602/302219855
I illustrated very nicely why Felix Unger said one should never assume....
in order to thank everyone, characteristic, novel style, varieties, low price and good quality, and the low sale price Thank everyone
http://l2y.eu/dddRo
http://l2y.eu/dddRo
http://l2y.eu/dddRo
│\_╭╭╭╭╭_/│
│ │\|/
│ ● ● │—☆—
│○ ╰┬┬┬╯ ○│/|\
│ ╰—╯ /
╰—┬○————┬○╯
╭│ │╮
╰┴—————┴╯ asghdjkliu;
Dear all,
As a neuromarketing expert, I find this solution highly dubious, not to say straightforward BS.
I have written a blog post about it, please find it here: http://brainethics.org/?p=1081
How anyone would trust this solution is a mystery to me. But obviously, you will get what you pay for... If you make the same decisions for who's to make your bypass surgery or repair your car, it's of course your choice. But it's not a wise one.
Neuromarketing is already saturated with BS and hype. This solution does not help one tiny bit. The fact that PopSci makes a story out of it is questionable.
Best wishes,
Thomas Zoëga Ramsøy
This "inventor" should be shot. The world is one giant circus of annoying advertisements and now this criminal is starting something which will end up in our brains being bombarded with commercial ads directly by wireless transmissions. People will no longer be able to have personal peace and privacy.