Mitosis Nematode worm eggs undergoing mitosis. Wikimedia Commons

Despite our best efforts, humans are still not as skilled at making life as life forms are themselves. So naturally, DARPA would like to take advantage of that skill. A new program called “Living Foundries” seeks to use biology as a manufacturing platform, enabling the creation of new materials that are impossible to make today.

The goal is a factory that can produce materials on-demand, resulting in an entirely new manufacturing paradigm for the US, one based on a catalog of life’s building blocks instead of the tools of traditional industry.

Synthetic biology is already a burgeoning, promising field. Last year, the J. Craig Venter Institute announced it had created the world’s first synthetic cell, with a chromosome produced by a machine, and we’ve seen a host of other bio-engineering breakthroughs like cells that communicate like electronic circuits, artificial proteins that can sustain life.

Pshaw, says DARPA. These are “primitive” examples based on ad-hoc, laborious processes. Breakthroughs take too long, and practical results — such as microbes that can eat cancer, or algae that can make biofuel — are still too far away.

DARPA would rather let scientists make anything they want, not just modified versions of existing things, explains Technology Review. The ingredients list includes the whole periodic table.

“Through an engineering-driven approach to biology, Living Foundries aims to create a rapid, reliable manufacturing capability where multiple cellular functions can be fabricated, mixed and matched on demand and the whole system controlled by integrated circuitry,” DARPA explains in an agency announcement.

The agency is seeking input from anyone with an idea, not just those from the biological sciences sector. Responses are due June 21, so better hurry. DARPA is also sponsoring an “Industry Day” June 28 in Arlington, Va., to explain its goals to interested parties.

[Technology Review]

6 Comments

I like the idea of blending machines and living things. I think we are headed in that direction. In terms of blending technology within our own biological bodies and minds. Of course what interests me is immortality. I'm an atheist. So when I die that's it. The only thing I will pass on is my genes to my son and daughter. But I would rather live a lot longer.

Death is destruction of all my knowledge and memories. I think that's worst than the actual dying part.

"Despite our best efforts, humans are still not as skilled at making life as life forms are themselves."

LOL! Humans *are* life forms. :-P

Could this could turn out badly? another experiment with our future not having a clue about the consequences, cool, go for it

"Despite our best efforts, humans are still not as skilled at making life as life forms are themselves."

Its called pregnancy...LMAO...fail.

@boka, keep a log or write your memoirs down. Death hasn't stopped Einstein or Shakespeare.

I think immortality is boring and would lead to massive procrastination.

blending human Anatomy with artificial living parts is what ultimately gonna give us immortality and expand our civilization in the entire universe and give us the chance to see whats "really" going on.



June 2013: American Energy Independence

Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email

Contributing Writers:

Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email

circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif
bmxmag-ps