There are three reasons why filmmakers distort science and technology: 1) to make things look cooler, 2) to make a story “work”, and 3) because they have no clue what they’re talking about, and they’ve chosen to ignore the advice (or pleas) of the film’s consultants. Although Stealth—a hypersonically paced Top Gun update about an unmanned air combat vehicle (UCAV) gone amok—gets correct some of the futuristic air-combat technology it depicts, much of it is dead wrong, and the film commits all three of the aforementioned sins.
Set in the near future, Stealth follows three young Navy pilots—played by Josh Lucas, Jessica Biel and Jamie Foxx—who are, evidently, the only pilots capable of handling the Navy’s newest weapon: the ultrafast, ultra-deadly, ultra-sleek Talon fighter jet. The fourth star is Extreme Deep Invader, or EDI, a fully autonomous UCAV. As EDI returns from its first mission, things go downhill fast. It gets blasted by a lightening bolt, which rewires its artificial intelligence, contained in a very cool-looking but highly unlikely glowing sphere inside the cockpit. (Cockpit in an unmanned vehicle? We’ll get to that in a minute.) Now the vehicle suddenly has an alarming propensity to play indie-rock bootlegs illegally pirated from the Internet. Yes, moviegoers, the plane has turned evil—so evil that it illegally downloads music.
I won’t bother with that particular idiocy; there are plenty of other ways to complain about the science and technology depicted in this movie. While its basic premise—a future Air Force equipped abundantly with autonomous aircraft—is absolutely true, the various deviations from valid military air-combat future trajectories are rampant. In no particular order:
Some elements in Stealth are pretty much on target. There is validity to the propulsion system, for example. The captain describes it as a pulse-detonation engine boosted by scramjet turbos. Both these engine types are in active development and will certainly propel aircraft to the kinds of speeds depicted in the film. And there is also substantial truth to the “neural network” used in EDI’s artificial-intelligence system. Designers of autonomous systems are striving to make them replicate human thinking and reasoning processes as much as possible. It is very unlikely, however, that a lightning bolt would turn them “evil”, especially to the tune of Internet piracy. Far more likely, though perhaps lacking dramatic potential, is that a lightning bolt would simply make them crash.
Directed by Rob Cohen
Written by W.D. Richter
Cast
Josh Lucas—Lt. Ben Gannon
Jessica Biel—Lt. Kara Wade
Jamie Foxx—Lt. Henry Purcell
Sam Shepard—Capt. George Cummings
Richard Roxburgh—Keith Orbit
Joe Morton—Capt. Dick Marshfield
Ian Bliss—Lt. Aaron Shaftsbury
Ebon Moss-Bachrach—Josh Hudson
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.
Check out the best of what's new here.
While I agree with a lot of the ridiculous of the movie, I believe you have misinterpreting many aspects, and over-criticized it.
First Point:
The movie is called Stealth, but there’s virtually no discussion of anything remotely stealth-related.
- I agree with that statement of yours.
Second:
The Talon’s cockpits are excessively complex... In reality, fighter-jet cockpits are getting simpler and simpler. Modern aircraft, both civilian and military, are increasingly using LCD screens that selectively display information they need, but only when they need it.
- I do not know if this is true or false, so I can't really comment on your point. I recognize it may well be true.
Third:
The reason EDI has [a cockpit], of course, is so that later in the film, Lucas can climb aboard and save the world.
-This is actually false, they described it so the EDI could be test-piloted (yeah it's more of an excuse than a reason.)
Fourth:
The airplanes fly at hypersonic velocities, which is fine at high altitudes. But they also fly obscenely fast through mountain canyons and 20 feet off the ground. No human pilot, now or in the future, could withstand the G-forces that the Talon pilots are subjected to as they make hard lefts and rights at more than 1,000 knots. Nor could they actually do any of the flying at those speeds and altitude—only a computer could steer that quickly through the mountains.
-For this you must use basic logic (and observational skills). They fly fast when traveling straight (also when wings are folded in), and they fly slower when they are turning/maneuvering the craft in various combat motions (wings are folded out, just like landing, showing the speed difference from super sonic speeds). Obviously they cant fly MACH 1-2 while in combat situations.
Fifth:
A more imaginative designer would have given the aircraft actual morphing wings and fuselages, which could change shape to any number of configurations based on the type of flying needed.
-Is this an issue or a critique? Just because a technology has been around does not mean it can not be a component of future technology.
Sixth:
But don’t even think about going supersonic with those tiny engine inlets. They’ll be breathing nothing except turbulence and junk at any speed above Mach 1. Also, the sharp bulges will send a fat radar spike dead ahead, just where you don’t want it.
-I agree with this.
Seventh:
Most of the combat action takes place at close range using machine guns. First of all, almost all combat action now takes place at long range using missiles. That will probably remain true forever. Secondly, the airplanes are moving so fast that any bullet hits can only be attributed to dumb luck, of which there is a lot in this movie.
-For the first part, a lot of the action was missiles/bombs. Actually, most of it was missiles in my recognition. I don't see how you saw more machine gun fire time than missiles. For the second part, bullets could be used and with some accuracy, especially if a computer targeting system is aiding the pilots fire.
Eighth:
Without giving away a crucial plot line, the most ridiculous fib comes when the Navy pilots finally figure out how to take EDI down. Let’s just say that you’ll never guess how they do it, because how they do it makes no sense.
-Can't remember them ever accomplishing this. I don't want to give out the plot, but the idea to me seems relatively sound.
Ninth:
It is very unlikely, however, that a lightning bolt would turn them “evil”, especially to the tune of Internet piracy. Far more likely, though perhaps lacking dramatic potential, is that a lightning bolt would simply make them crash.
-First off, the plan wasn't evil, but rather confused about right and wrong. It had definitions of right, but they were not as complete as a average humans would be, therefore causing it to make bad decisions since it evolved to AI. Next, about the piracy, the plan did that before the bolt, and was not considered evil yet, so it should not be considered when seeing the plan is evil after the bolt as it is a constant for both situations. Last, the idea of the lightning bolt caused it, (also had something to do with the other pilot i believe being connected by the bolt or whatever) is just ludicrous, and I agree there, and they would probably just crash.
Overall, I see you have good incite about it, but in some places, I think you are just bashing the film rather than giving supported arguments.
~JamInc