Battlefield Blimp Tracks Low-Flying Cruise Missiles

this really struck me as I read this:
"Previous demonstrations showed that the blimps also have fairly good survivability under fire."

FAIRLY good survivability?!
that billion-tax-dollar monster getting knocked down?!
how good is "fairly good"?
how much explosives would it take?
I doubt it can survive a SINGLE bomber swooping down and letting loose...
on that staitionary, large target :O

I'm guessing that the 3km tethers are going to make these puppies a bit of a hazard to friendly aircraft.

Havent you heard of WW2 era Barrage Balloons?

@Technofreakface

The military hasn't just started fighting wars four years ago. They've been doing it for awhile now. Obviously, there would be air defense systems surrounding the general area. Any area that is worth guarding won't just have one of these blimps in place. We have surface to air missiles for defense too, ya know. They work in conjunction with other assets to protect an area. I imagine the Air Force would patrol the skies, or at least have aircraft and crew on alert to intercept anything that gets too close. Meanwhile, the Army would have surface to air missile batteries on the ground.

The idea is to protect those areas from cruise missiles...which are long-range standoff weapons. You don't send a bomber in before the cruise missile destroys the radar antenna, would you? Because obviously, the radar would alert the missile crews to the presence of the bomber and they would fire off a few Patriots at it. Splash one bomber.

The comment about the blimps being relatively survivable from small arms is about small infiltration teams of soldiers who try to destroy the blimp. Of course, if they decide to shoot at the blimp, they'd reveal their presence as well as their location, wouldn't they?

Also, fairly good survivibility means how long it stays up in the air with holes in it.

Blimp- 90% airbag, 10% exspensive sensors.

So, if you shoot up the ballon, it settles to the ground, gets patched, refilled, and put back up. It is only if the sensors are blasted that real damage has been done.

Since its purpose is air defence, no airborn target is going to get near this. Small arms and should based anti-air weapons are the only things that should be able to sneak close to this thing.

I think a greater threat would be someone suiciding the base and this thing goes floating off downwind, shot down, and the tech stolen and sold off. (Which would take more doing that the kinds of forces we currently are facing).