Taking the "sport" out of "sport shooting" and the "man" out of "marksman," a company called TrackingPoint has developed what it calls “Intelligent Digital Tracking Scopes” for use on its “Precision Guided Firearms.” The latter is something of a misnomer, as neither the munition itself nor the firearm is guided, but the shooter is--sort of. TrackingPoint’s technology allows a shaky shooter to digitally tag a target through the optic, which then won’t let the firearm discharge until it is lined up perfectly on the target.
In other words, once you tag the target with the scope you can’t miss. At least that’s the claim. Technologically speaking, there seems to be little reason that claim doesn’t hold up if it indeed works as advertised (see video below). The company is developing three rifles with integrated intelligent scopes, two for tactical use and one hunting model.
That ratio seems to fit; while it’s true that tapping an onboard computer to ensure every shot is on target is somewhat unsporting for the average hunter or (especially) sports shooter, there are plenty of situations that arise in law enforcement and military operations where the ability to double-check one’s trigger pull is a highly-attractive, potentially life-saving feature. The rifles go into production next year.
[via Kottke]
Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
I could really use this in CS:GO haha!!!!
(queue the Terminator theme)
This is such a relief over the prospect of being shot to death with a 'dumb' firearm. I'll sleep better now.
Fly over with a drone, land the drone, target and ready.
Here little kitty kitty, terriost. Ka-BAMMY!
Fly home.
Although this is nice initially, when the price comes down and the technology proliferates, this will be more of an advantage for terrorists and criminals since they tend to have less training than military and police and are less accurate. All of a sudden the bad guys can aim as well as the good guys with a short tutorial on the system.
TheZomb,
Yup, the criminals do tend to buy the best weapons eventually and us common folk just keep the simple stuff. YIKES!
in order to thank everyone, characteristic, novel style, varieties, low price and good quality, and the low sale price. Thank everyone
http://al.ly/_9v
http://al.ly/_9v
http://al.ly/_9v
http://al.ly/_9v
│\_╭╭╭╭╭_/│
│ │\|/
│ ● ● │—☆—
│○ ╰┬┬┬╯ ○│/|\
│ ╰—╯ /
╰—┬○————┬○╯
╭│ │╮
╰┴—————┴╯
This device/system is interesting, but all I see in the video is it being used against perfectly still targets. I will be much more impressed if they get it to work on a moving target. That being said, it will likely be awesome against those non-moving targets.
Most of the (thankfully few)short range active shooter situations I have been in were more about speed on target - as accuracy was a part of muscle memory from drill work.
While optics are nice, instinctual aim is always better, as it greatly reduces the time to target. Adding in time for a target confirmation would have your torso airconditioned before you could use them.
For long range shooting, computer calculations are already utilized (there is even a handy little sniper app for your IPhone to do the math for you). Unless this system is able to judge the wind for you, includes a rangefinder, and is calculated to the drop of your platform, it won't help much with long range situations.
Now, for short range, high accuracy, timed shot situations (LE snipers, for example, where the goal is not range, but avoiding collaterals) this would be useful.
Most SWAT I know are far too prideful of their marksmanship to use such a tool, and the tool is really just replacing training more than improving it.
Now, for hunting, there is a market for such a tool. You average hunter is not that good of a shot (due to health, shakey tree stands, practice, or the consumption of adult beverages). If Uncle Mike can cue in on the deer a 6-pack into hunting so that he cannot miss (and has to look twice to make sure the three deer he sees are really just one, and that one is wearing blaze orange), then accidents will be avoided. The most common hunting accident, after all, is a poorly aimed gut shot that kills the deer 2-3 days and half a county away.
Saying that makes it less sporting in a world with doe urine, tree stands, didgital camo, baiting stations, dog hunting, and rifle optics is meaningless. Most hunting turned into Bambi Assissination long ago - and putting more meat in the freezer, rather than rotting under a bush after a great deal of suffering is sportingly merciful in my mind.
now imagine when they combine this with that steerable-bullet concept. mark and tag multiple enemies, and fire a burst with each bullet flying towards a seperate target. Iron man's suit isn't too far away now.
so if the rifle was swinging side to side as the shooter was aiming and when the shot was fired wouldn't the inertia of the rifle barrel keep it moving so when the bullet left the barrel the barrel would have already moved off the target and so the resulting hit would be off the original target