Uranium-Eating Bacteria Professor Judy Wall of the University of Missouri is working with bacteria that can render toxic radioactive metals inert University of Missouri-Columbia

Scrubbing sites of radiation is no easy task, not to mention costly. Aside from all the technical hurdles, the potential health hazards drive up the cost further, making it feasible in only the most necessary of cases. But researchers at the University of Missouri have found a work force that may be willing to clean up our radioactive messes on the cheap.

Judy Wall, a biochemistry professor at the University of Missouri, has found that certain sulfate-reducing bacteria can convert the toxic forms of radioactive metals to inert substances, by altering the solubility of heavy metals. For instance, these bacteria can turn radioactive uranium to the nearly-insoluble form uraninite naturally, no Hazmat suit required. The radioactivity of the substances isn't removed, but the metals are no longer chemically available to be absorbed by organisms that might be harmed by them.

With a tweak here and there, these bacteria could clean up abandoned uranium mines, industrial waste riddled with heavy metals and storage tanks where radioactive materials have been stowed. They also might be able to cleanse water of heavy metal pollutants. The bacteria are already present in more than 7,000 heavy metal contaminated sites, but there's one tiny catch: the bacteria only live at highly specific levels of oxygen and temperature, making them a finicky work force to boss around.

Wall and collaborators from Lawrence Berkeley National Lab are working with the bacteria in a sealed environment to isolate genes in order to develop an oxygen-tolerant strain. The obstacles are many, but the team has already isolated a handful of genes critical to converting uranium. If successful, environmental authorities could potentially reclaim large areas long ago contaminated by mining and industry without the expense, or hazard, of putting human bodies to the task.

[Science Daily]

Want to learn more about breakthroughs in electronics, medicine, nanotech, and more?
Subscribe to Popular Science and enter to win $5,000!

6 Comments

two sides to this:

1) Makes nuclear power plant wastes scrubbed

2) Makes it an easier decion wether or not to destroy the middle east along with Al Quidah with some nukes and then just clean it all up with some bacteria over several years

Don't think this technology will be used to justify the building of more nuclear power plants (sic).

its what I would do if I were them :D

nuclear power = amazing effiency + energy to spare
solar panels = environmental psychos + uneducated public

I guess I'm slow. "The radioactivity of the substance is not removed." So how is this a breakthrough? Radiation is Radiation isn't it? So it's no longer technically enriched/depleted uranium, but it is still some radioactive washout. Big deal. Do I still have to store this byproduct for 2 million years?

stjohnson is correct, the radioactive properties cannot be altered by bacteria at all. Btw, the radiation will likely kill off the bacteria anyways..depending on how active it is.

silly article.

No breakthrough here.

Isn't this what Washington University was doing? To clean up Hanford?



Download Our iPhone App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed



Become a Fan On Facebook

Share links with friends, comment on stories and more


December 2009: Best of What's New

In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.

Check out the best of what's new here.

Popular Science Photo Pool


Share your photos in the Pop Sci pool at www.flickr.com!
tags_sprite.png
POP_embeddedForm_cover_May09.jpg