A group of researchers warn of the potential deadly consequences rising from wireless drug delivery

Wireless Drugs iStockPhoto

The annoying physical exertion associated with lifting a pill to your mouth and washing it down with a Dixie cup full of H20 could soon be history. Much excitement is building around electronic implants that dispense medicines automatically or via a wireless medical network. According to a team of Australian and US researchers, however, remote Intelligent Drug Delivery Systems (RIDDS) are rife with security issues.

RIDDS devices are implanted under the skin and connected wirelessly to a medical control center where healthcare workers can adjust medication frequency or levels as necessary, based either on direct patient observation or sensor outputs. The technology is being created for patients with physical disabilities, learning difficulties, or who are otherwise unable to give themselves medication.

As with any unproven wireless communications technology, RIDDS are open to various hacking and cracking issues, including eavesdropping, jamming, and tampering. And that’s where the researchers caution RIDDS devices could prove deadly. They claim a hacker might intercept data, steal personal information, or even trigger commands to release medication inappropriately and so harm or kill a patient.

Gulp.

Via: EurekAlert

Want to learn more about breakthroughs in electronics, medicine, nanotech, and more?
Subscribe to Popular Science and enter to win $5,000!

3 Comments

taylorhengen

from New York, New York

Scary to imagine what the high end illegal-drug dealers (and their customers) would/will do with this technology.

billdale

from Los Angeles, CA

Terminal Man, an early novel by best-selling author Michael Crichton, described simple electronic implants designed to control seizures. Despite their apparent foolproof simplicity and efficacy, Crichton's novel predicted that such devices would at first work as intended, but would eventually begin to do the exact opposite-- they would trigger unending, violent seizures.

No doubt if Crichton were alive today, he would perhaps be writing a tale to scare us away from using the device described in this article-- but then again he might just caution us to design in a "fail safe" feature in which it was only physically capable of supplying some safe minimum dose of a drug, so that it could not be responsible for a patient's death or injury. Even malevolent hackers could not do more than interrupt drug delivery; and if anyone or anything overrode its program, the device could perhaps be designed to trigger an alarm and call for help.

Apart from the wireless communication, is this so different than many insulin pumps (and similar devices) already in common useage?



Download Our iPhone App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed



Become a Fan On Facebook

Share links with friends, comment on stories and more


December 2009: Best of What's New

In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.

Check out the best of what's new here.

Popular Science Photo Pool


Share your photos in the Pop Sci pool at www.flickr.com!
tags_sprite.png
POP_embeddedForm_cover_May09.jpg