Geneticists announced last week in the journal Nature that they have sequenced the complete set of DNA for three people—a Nigerian man, a Chinese man, and a Caucasian woman with leukemia—bringing the total number of individual genomes sequenced and published to five. (The first two are those of the genetics pioneers J. Craig Venter and James Watson.) The three independent teams all used next-generation sequencing technology from Illumina to get the jobs done in a fraction of the time and cost of the decade-long, $2.7 billion effort of the Human Genome Project, a composite genome from many individuals. Writ large, the three feats take a giant step towards the promise of personal genome sequencing for use in medicine that goes beyond generalities of race and gender to that which is truly individual.
Take adverse drug reactions, for example. Only .1 percent of your DNA differs from that of someone you pass on the street. Still, that amounts to 3 million alternate nucleotides, enough to affect how differently you would react to the same drug treatment. According to a 1998 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association, more than two million Americans suffer from adverse drug reactions per year. About 100,000 die from it.
There’s been an initial study to pit genome against genome in regard to drug efficacy. In September, a team at the J. Craig Venter Institute in Maryland compared the genome of their namesake with that of James Watson to gauge how well each could metabolize treatments like antipsychotics and the cancer drug tamoxifen. Turns out that Venter would likely process the meds much better than Watson. Precise information like this would affect a doctor’s prescribed dose, a matter, potentially, of life or death.
Personal genomics also stands to remedy troubles that come when drugs are prescribed based on skin color. Take the controversial drug BiDil, which is targeted to African-Americans at risk of heart disease. Critics of BiDil say its developer, NitroMed, overlooked social influences on the rate of hypertension in people of African descent. Furthermore, as the Venter vs. Watson bout showed, individual variation is no small factor—especially when you consider that two people of the same racial group can differ more on a genetic level than two people of different races. “One’s ethnicity/race is, at best, a probabilistic guess at one’s true genetic makeup,” write the Venter Institute study authors.
As more individual genomes are sequenced and compared, researchers will be able to more finely dissect the genetics of diseases which seem more common in a particular group. The 1000 Genomes Project was launched early this year to that end. It plans to sequence the full genetic blueprints for men and women of widely different ancestries to get a clearer picture of just how different that .1 percent is—a boon for modern medicine.
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.
Check out the best of what's new here.
Interesting, this was posted 38 minutes in the future, very interesting.
Dustin H
Dustin2127
Maybe different timezone?
Anyway genetic technology looks promising Hopfully they will eventually be able to turn select genes on or off this could help slow down aging prevent heart disease and other health problems that can be caused by your DNA.
Is there a reason for describing the men by nationality and not by 2 men? Or are they not men for not being american? I really dont understand the reasoning behind this, I visit this site daily but with articles as offensive as this I doubt i'll be back.
I realize that JOIs7 will probably not return to view this article again, however, for anyone that holds similar complaints about PopSci articles being offensive for differentiating by nationality: This study was conducted based on the continental genetic origins of 2 men. Last time I checked neither Asia nor Africa were anything but continents. It is possible that both men are born in the U.S.A. natural American citizens as well.
I just feel that this distinction needs to be made.
from Kent, WA
Tracking by geographical area and race are appropriate things to do if we wish to understand human evolution and dispersion from Africa. It appears from the fossil record that the great bulk of evolution took place in Africa and radiated to the rest of the world. In the process the most recent variations on human-hood replaced all versions that had gone forth earlier.
DNA can shed great light on why this process worked like it apparently did, but only if the science isn't bashed and hidden by PC fanatics.