Last week, Google released a beta application that provides walking directions in major cities such as New York, San Francisco, and Minneapolis. It's another sign that the search giant is getting even more specific about "organizing the world's information," right down to the sidewalk in front of your house. If you want to walk from your apartment in the suburbs to a restaurant downtown, Google will show you the best route with turn-by-turn directions you can print out or follow on your smartphone. To use the service if you live in a large city, go to maps.google.com and look for the walking directions link.
Walking directions provide a more direct route than those for driving: they let you walk on one-way streets regardless of which direction you're going, and ignore "no left/right turn" signs that are vehicle-specific. Google Maps routes you around hills to help minimize huffing and puffing (when it makes sense--the directions won't alter your course too much), and the travel time estimate is based on walking the route instead of driving it (with accommodations for uphill and downhill travels).
It seems any new Google Maps add-on causes a slight stir with Internet users who are concerned about privacy. The Street View feature, which lets you see a 360-degree photo of the location you intend to visit and then view a succession of images as you travel the virtual route online, is well within legal limits, says privacy expert Mike Spinney from the Ponemon Institute, a think tank that studies privacy issues.
"As long as the routes provided direct the user along public rights-of-way, I don't see any privacy issues with Google's walking directions," he told PopSci.com via email. "I'm unaware of any case in which Google has been found in violation of the law."
Still, lawsuits such as the Aaron and Christine Boring case filed in April have raised concerns that Google may be going too far in categorizing the Web. It's worth thinking about: is there some information that's a little too close to home? Other Google services, such as the recently unveiled Google Health will "store and manage all of your health info in one place," according to the site. Whether we are comfortable handing all of this information over to "the cloud" (or Google specifically) is still open for debate.
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
Inside NASA's astronaut bootcamp and the grueling new training regimen for deep space. Plus, ten young geniuses shaking up science today, one writer's quest to analyze every man-made chemical in her body and more.
Check out the issue's full contents online here
Really not much more than an extension of Mapquest.
On a related note, a local community has said that it wants out of the Google Earth database. They do NOT want their exclusive community viewable on the web
People generally are way too much on the paranoid side.... No ones trying to steal your grandma's secret pie recipe.
If its a public street whats the difference of being able to see a 360 view picture or just driving there? Either way its accessible, so i don't understand how this is a privacy concern. If people are that paranoid, move into a gated community.
if people took 5 minutes and read parts of googles info they might just figure out that these aren't real time pictures and are rather old
I agree with everyone here. People need to stop freaking out over stupid crap. One thing I would like to add however, I recently read an article explaining how one of the Google "higher up's" working on street view, doesn't have her house included in the photos. She lives above the four seasons in downtown SF and paid over $100,000 for their very own stop lights to be installed at her intersection. NO LIE!