
SUBSCRIBE NOW! POPULAR SCIENCE!
12 issues for
only $14
Ninety years ago the Spanish flu swept across the globe, killing between 50 and 100 million people in only a few months. Since then, the specter of another flu pandemic dealing death and woe around the world has periodically terrified the medical and popular communities. But scientists searching for ways to prevent a similar outbreak in the form of the H5N1 bird flu have found a cure for the deadliest flu in the most unlikely place: nonagenarian immune systems.
A new paper in the journal Nature confirms that a team of doctors has succeeded in isolating pandemic-flu killing antibodies from 90+ year old survivors of the Spanish flu outbreak. To test whether or not the antibodies still worked, the doctors injected the immune cells into mice, and then dosed the mice with preserved copies of the 1918 flu recovered from frozen victims of the Spanish flu that had been buried in Alaskan permafrost. Within those mice, the antibodies and the virus renewed a microscopic battle that had lain dormant for almost a century. The mice that received a high dose of the antibodies lived, while mice that received a low dose of antibody, or none at all, died as expected.While the authors of the paper indicated that understanding the immune system’s ability to “remember” infections for so long could be useful in studying all manner of viral infection, it is unlikely that antibodies synthesized from survivors would be able to immediately help in a future bird flu pandemic. The 1918 Spanish flu and the modern Asian bird flu are different species, and the antibodies are probably not compatible. Rather, by understanding how the body produces and preserves flu antibodies over a lifetime doctors hope to be able to develop more effective vaccines specific to viruses like the bird flu. Currently, the common flu kills 30,000 Americans a year, so developing effective vaccines is important even without an outbreak of the more deadly pandemic strain of the disease.
The Fastest Swimsuit on Earth
"At the Beijing Olympic pool, perhaps the only star bigger than Michael Phelps was his swimsuit. The Speedo LZR (pronounced "laser"), like Phelps, didn't disappoint: 16 of the 32 gold-medal winners wore the full-body suit, and another 13 wore LZR pants."
[Read full story]
A Finish that Repairs Itself
"It won't save you from a key-gouging vandal, but the finish on the 2008 Infiniti EX and FX-model SUVs can erase scrapes caused by, say, car washes or stray branches."
[Read full story]
Boeing Advanced Tactical Laser
"Truck-mounted IED-destroying lasers have already been tested in Iraq, but firing lasers from an airplane is a more difficult proposition."
[Read full story]
A Spit Test for Heart Attacks
"This year, San Antonio EMT crews began using a spit test that detects cardiac arrest faster, more accurately and more cheaply than other diagnostic tests."
[Read full story]



Comments
30,000 Americans die each year of the common flu.
"This year, more than 300,000 Americans will die from illnesses related to overweight and obesity."
http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/news/testimony/obesity07162003.htm
Such illnesses include diabetes, stroke, etc etc...
I think scientists and governments, and general populations have their priorities wrong...
11 out of 35 people found this comment helpful@ scubasdsteve87: You would be right if there weren't MILLIONS of dollars per year spent on trying to cure / prevent deaths due to obesity related illness. But there is FAR more money spent on trying to cure illness and disease related to obesity than there is spent on flu research.
Not to mention, if a flu pandemic hit that wiped out 10 million or more in a matter of months, we would be begging those flu researchers to save us.
It's foolish to think that if "only" 30,000 people a year die of something (just in ONE country) it's not worth studying. For one thing, it's 30,000 people! For another, research into curing or treating one type of infection or illness often illuminates the way to better treatments for other illnesses.
19 out of 21 people found this comment helpfulThe H1N1 influenza killed between 50 and 100 million people, back when the Earth had a population of about 1.5 billion.
I'd say spending a little money on research into influenza is probably worthwhile, as a repeat of a H1N1-class flu that killed roughly 3-6% of the Earth's population would be in the "bad things" category. What was most devastating about H1N1 was that the age category with the greatest number of deaths was in the 20-40 age group -- it wasn't the influenza we know now that preys on the very young and very old.
Obesity is pretty simple. Stop eating so much and walk more. Billions of dollars in research saved.
20 out of 22 people found this comment helpful