Soon Jepsen and her competitors will take E Ink (and one another) on. At least one other manufacturer says that it will ship an e-reader screen this year with color and video and that, unlike 3Qi, the screen will remain full-color in low-power mode. Made by Qualcomm, the Mirasol display creates pixels with tiny moving metal pieces, just a few micro-meters across, that move up and down to reflect light of different wavelengths and colors. Like E Ink’s screen, it doesn’t need a backlight and uses energy only when changing images.
There are more contenders in the pipeline, too, all boasting some variation of color, video or both. A Philips spin-off called Liquavista plans to produce low-power, video-playing black-and-white screens at the end of this year, and full-color versions by the end of next. They rely on a technique called electrowetting, which replaces the liquid crystals inside an LCD with drops of oil in water that require less electricity to move. The old guard E Ink plans to release a color version late this year, and the company has displays running videos in its labs that it hopes to produce in a few years.
But, as Jepsen reminds me (with uncharacteristic brusqueness) when I mention that there are other fast, colorful reflective displays around: “not that are ready to ship.” Hers is also likely to be cheaper. The 3Qi screen, as a tweak on existing LCDs, is manufactured on the same machinery and from most of the same materials as the 1.5 billion displays shipped every year. As a result, a netbook with a 10-inch Pixel Qi screen should cost little more than one with
an ordinary LCD.
Whether 3Qi succeeds will ultimately depend on the subjective experience of millions of sets of eyes. The circumstances in which people feel comfortable reading turn out to be somewhat unpredictable. For instance, it’s as much a myth that LCDs cause eyestrain because their backlights shine into your eyes like a flashlight as it is that reflective screens like E Ink’s are easier on the eyes just because they reflect light. “Light is light,” says VCD Sciences display consultant Lou Silverstein, a fellow of the Society for Information Display. “Your eyeball can’t tell whether it’s reflected or transmitted.” LCDs and E Ink look different because of the way E Ink reflects light. Its pigments sit at the surface and scatter light in many directions, just as paper does. LCDs and even other reflective screens direct light only at certain angles, so the look isn’t quite as uniform as paper. Jepsen says her team has employed a number of tricks to improve the angle of reflection on the 3Qi, but because it’s still an LCD, it will never look quite as much like print as E Ink.
But it may not have to. The real goal of Pixel Qi, Ryan says, is to “try to ask and answer a big question: What is the device of the future? The idea that people would actually carry three devices—phone, netbook, e-reader—doesn’t seem right.”
So the Kindle-style e-reader may be a transitory gadget, a step toward super-thin tablets that support modern computing just as well as old-fashioned reading. Pixel Qi may help catalyze that change, although it too may find itself a bridge technology, superseded once people cross to the all-color, all-the-time side. By that time, though, Jepsen may have moved on. She has near-term plans to improve Pixel Qi’s current display, making it more efficient and offering it in different sizes. And then it may be back to the developing world, this time to spread the influence of television. “People, primarily in India, are coming to me saying, you know, make us a 10-watt TV,” she says. A battery-powered HDTV may sound frivolous but, Jepsen explains, India’s musical movies are a cultural institution that many people get left out of because of a lack of electricity. “We want to see our Bollywood,” they tell her.
Jepsen’s motivation now, as an entrepreneur, is the same as it was during her days of projecting art-project holograms onto German cities: “My reward for all the technical work is to get this image I can enjoy at the end.”
Senior Associate Editor Lauren Aaronson runs PopSci’s What’s New section and the Best of What’s New Awards.
single pageThe incredible innovations, like drone swarms and perpetual flight, bringing aviation into the world of tomorrow. Plus: today's greatest sci-fi writers predict the future, the science behind the summer's biggest blockbusters, a Doctor Who-themed DIY 'bot, the organs you can do without, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
Fantastic. Looks good too. How does it stand up to Apple's new 10" iPhone reader coming out in two months for $1,000.00?
Sounds awesome! although that full-color contender might be problematic in a few years.
I love the long articles with interviews and technical descriptions. Keep them coming
The screen is a technology marvel, but I don't buy into the tricorder concept (one device that does everything).
I'm of the opinion that ereaders will become amazingly cheap. So, why would I want an expensive universal device? I might risk a 20-50 buck reader at a beach or on a picnic, but not a $500+gadget that had a lot of my personal data.
Not to mention conflicts in operation. If I get a phone call while reading a book/ebook, I just put it down and answer the phone -- no pause mumbo jumbo. By the same token, if I'm downloading yet another Windows update or some other huge file, I can still talk on the phone and/or read a book/ebook.
I think that there is a strong market for the tri-corder device.
The only advantages a smart phone has is portability. With a Blue Tooth, the netbook sized laptop in my briefcase or backpack has all the connectivity I need to answer calls (or read an audio book to me while I ignore another conference meeting).
Laptops only weakness is size and battery life. (1) Improve the screen and you extend battery life. (2) With a two screen set-up using a touch screen keypad and you get something thin enough to be reasonably portable.
E-reader's only advantage is battery life. If I can use my laptop as an eReader with extended life, why wouldn't I want one? If it can let me surf the internet, call my wife, read a book, watch TV, take notes, draw a picture, and read my a story, it would be well worth the price - - - the price, of course, of carrying it around in a man-purse.
now THIS is the future of ereading !
www.ereaderuniverse.com/profiles/blogs/its-official-i-have-seen-the
I plan to buy as many of these as I can get my hands on, and distribute them to my relatives. The computer industry is not listening to the customers, but Mary Lou Jepson is.
Islam and Sharia Law are taking over the lands in modern Europe as you read this. Make the stand today and educate yourself on this dire matter!
LOL!!!! "The price of carrying it around in a man purse."
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! Ah come on man its just a purse!!!! Are you homophobic? Come on man being with another man aint so bad. I mean I've experimented and it aint so bad. Just bite the pillow when it starts to hurt.
"If it can let me surf the internet, call my wife, read a book, watch TV, take notes, draw a picture, and read my a story, it would be well worth the price - - - the price, of course, of carrying it around in a man-purse."
I would say that that's true if you're dainty.
Men like me don't need a "murse" and we don't need a fanny pack either.
I want one of these devices to be durable and hands on. I want to be able to toss it onto the car seat and stare at it while I'm sitting on the toilet and I want to be able to kill a bug with it when I'm out on the Parcourse, doing elevated pushups. I move about in the leaves and the grass. I live near a large forest preserve, and I want a tough, waterproof, scratch-resistant and dependable device that will let me sit down and look at something brilliant that I've written. I don't need a PC. I need a reader. Big difference.
-------------
www.anamericanlion.com/
I also want a reader that can take a beating. I wonder if it would be possible to design the outer shell like the rugby cell phone? they can stand up to the test. So why cant the apply that to all the new technology comming out into the world? However, they would still need to slim down the shell though. thoes phones are extremely thick.
Mary Lou Jepson is an amazing woman with an amazing story and OLPC was and is an amazingly altruistic concept worthy of the support of us all. Pixel Qi, however, I don't really get. Where are the big time product announcements to support the pub? I know they had some demos at CES and will likely at 3GSM, but outside of engaging discussions with Jepson, what's there? This isn't like OLED where they are engineering a completely new tech. My big question is why would venture folks put all kinds of money behind a lowest-common-denominator tech like pixel qi (power sucking inside, no color or video outside) instead of something like liquavista or mirasol. liquavista's a ways off, but mirasol seems like an amazing display technology equally as imminent as Jepson's Pixel Qi. www.mirasoldisplay.com
They should make the back a solar panel, for charging in places that don't have easy access to electricity, like rural Africa. A camera would be nice too, it would make for an interesting photo taking experience, because it would be like looking through a window, and saving the scene.
Don't let this woman fool you. She cares nothing for kids ... only money. The author might check with her step children. They are now adults but were barely teens when she began pursuing their married dad. There's not an altruistic bone in her body. She may be bright as an engineer but since this piece is largely personal it must be said she is a very self serving woman.
that's good news
http://www.sowaar.com/category/desktop_wallpapers خلفيات سطح المكتب
http://www.sowaar.com/category/girls-wallpapers صور بنات
http://www.sowaar.com/category/animals_wallpapers/ صور حيوانات
http://www.sowaar.com
Digital papers are becoming more appealing as we become comfortable with our new approach to communication and publication. I am interested in this machine for my daily news, yet twelve months ago I personally would have rejected the whole concept of holding a machine to read my news articles. I have arrived fully into the techno age.
www.smashhitdisplays.com