In 2005, after nine years at display companies, Jepsen applied for a professorship at MIT. As part of her interview, she spoke with professor Nicholas Negroponte, who had just returned from proposing his “$100 laptop” idea—building low-cost laptops for kids in developing countries—at the World Economic Forum. Jepsen and Negroponte hit it off immediately. Within hours, the two had hatched the One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) initiative, and Negroponte immediately dispatched her to Europe to talk with technology leaders. Working as OLPC’s screen guru, she made the project happen, says Media Lab researcher V. Michael Bove, a technical adviser to OLPC who has known Jepsen since her grad-student days. “She was the one who had the big fights with Taiwanese LCD makers and engineers who didn’t think it”—making an inexpensive laptop—“could be done.”
The true humanitarian worth of spreading cheap laptops across the developing world is up for debate, but OLPC had one undeniable effect: It led directly to the advent of the small, stripped-down, inexpensive “netbook,” a sector that now makes up about 20 percent of all laptop sales. Once the nonprofit showed that it could build a compact, functional laptop for less than $200, nearly every other computer maker followed suit, and the gadget-buying public snatched them up. Since its debut in 2007, OLPC has delivered more than a million computers; Acer, Asus, HP and other consumer-electronics companies now ship approximately 40 million netbooks a year.
Jepsen left OLPC at the beginning of 2008 to take her display technology further. She started Pixel Qi with her own money and the half a million frequent-flier miles she had racked up traveling to Africa. For the OLPC computer, she had designed a new low-power display that could have maximum battery life in villages where the electricity was spotty at best. Instead of always using the power-hungry LCD backlamp, the screen could be illuminated by reflecting sunlight (a variation on the outdoor-readable screens found in some cellphones and rugged laptops). 3Qi is designed to bring the battery-saving benefits of reflective pixels to the rest of us.
She hashed out ideas over the dinner table with her husband, John Ryan, a telecom consultant, and when he became more interested in her project than his own job, she hired him as chief operating officer. After securing venture-capital funding, she rented offices across the street from YouTube in San Bruno, California, set up a lab for playing with liquid crystals in the office kitchen, and began experimenting with ways to get more light through the screen. By the time she and her growing team finished, they had changed nearly every layer inside the LCD, so that all that remains from the original OLPC screen, Jepsen says, is the basic idea of the black-and-white mode. “It doesn’t sound as cool as giving poor kids laptops, but it’s one and the same,” she says. As Pixel Qi scales up, the cost of the screens (which are going into the next OLPC computer) should come down, making Jepsen’s technology ever more accessible.
Jepsen is still involved in Pixel Qi’s technical work, but most of the rest of the time she’s in the air, on her way to supervise manufacturing in Taipei or to meet with a company about using her screen. She logs nearly 300,000 air miles a year in service of these missions. And despite the seemingly obvious benefits of her screen designs, it’s never an easy sell. “To a certain degree, she’s selling ice to Eskimos,” says John Jacobs, a laptop analyst at DisplaySearch who used to evaluate new screens for Apple. “No matter how great the ice is, they’ve already got some.”
Yet Jepsen has an “ace in the hole,” Jacobs says: “She’s a phenomenal evangelist for the technology.” Since she started Pixel Qi, she has effectively completed a world tour every month, trying to convince computer manufacturers from China to Texas to use her screens. When a CEO dismisses Pixel Qi as just another here-today, gone-tomorrow screen technology, she pulls out her OLPC credentials: “Which one has shipped a million products within a year of starting mass production? Which one? There are none,” she tells them. “There are none at all. Which one has even shipped 1,000 products within a year of mass production? OK, 100? We’ve got a million. That’s why you should believe me.”
When she’s at the LCD factory in Taipei that’s gearing up to produce her new screen, Jepsen is on constant call, sometimes napping on the floor after pulling an all-nighter. It takes more than 100 different machines to assemble the layers of an LCD screen, and as Pixel Qi moves into mass production, problems can occur at every step: a few specks of dust in the workroom taint the materials, a batch of the liquid crystals doesn’t precisely match the batch that came before. This is when Jepsen is most content. “Time disappears, coffee appears, and it’s just work at high pressure to debug the problem. Those days are actually some of my happiest. The speed is fast, and the insights gained are tremendous.”
Part of her ability to sustain that nonstop rhythm may come from the quiet force—the qi?—of Jepsen’s personality. But part of it, serendipitously, comes from her illness. Thanks to the destruction of her pituitary gland, her body no longer makes the cortisol that usually regulates a person’s internal clock, so she doesn’t get jet lag; she feels awake as soon as she takes her pills. “My health used to limit me, but now it’s sort of an advantage,” she says. “I think business executives may consider it”—pituitary-gland removal—“an optional surgery at some time in the future.”
The frantic pace is necessary because, as young as the e-reader industry may be, trying to break into it is like trying to launch a new operating system after Microsoft. She’s up against a company that pretty much started the business: E Ink, which today controls some 90 percent of the market. Spun out of MIT’s Media Lab in 1997, E Ink makes the screens for most of today’s e-readers, including the Kindle. The E Ink screen mimics the look of ink on paper because it’s filled with floating particles of actual ink pigment. A zap of current sends oppositely charged black or white particles to the surface, forming images that stay put until zapped again. That means the screen draws power only when changing pages—ideal for a book, with which you can stare at a sheet for minutes. But again: no color, and no video.
single pageFive amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
Fantastic. Looks good too. How does it stand up to Apple's new 10" iPhone reader coming out in two months for $1,000.00?
Sounds awesome! although that full-color contender might be problematic in a few years.
I love the long articles with interviews and technical descriptions. Keep them coming
The screen is a technology marvel, but I don't buy into the tricorder concept (one device that does everything).
I'm of the opinion that ereaders will become amazingly cheap. So, why would I want an expensive universal device? I might risk a 20-50 buck reader at a beach or on a picnic, but not a $500+gadget that had a lot of my personal data.
Not to mention conflicts in operation. If I get a phone call while reading a book/ebook, I just put it down and answer the phone -- no pause mumbo jumbo. By the same token, if I'm downloading yet another Windows update or some other huge file, I can still talk on the phone and/or read a book/ebook.
I think that there is a strong market for the tri-corder device.
The only advantages a smart phone has is portability. With a Blue Tooth, the netbook sized laptop in my briefcase or backpack has all the connectivity I need to answer calls (or read an audio book to me while I ignore another conference meeting).
Laptops only weakness is size and battery life. (1) Improve the screen and you extend battery life. (2) With a two screen set-up using a touch screen keypad and you get something thin enough to be reasonably portable.
E-reader's only advantage is battery life. If I can use my laptop as an eReader with extended life, why wouldn't I want one? If it can let me surf the internet, call my wife, read a book, watch TV, take notes, draw a picture, and read my a story, it would be well worth the price - - - the price, of course, of carrying it around in a man-purse.
now THIS is the future of ereading !
www.ereaderuniverse.com/profiles/blogs/its-official-i-have-seen-the
I plan to buy as many of these as I can get my hands on, and distribute them to my relatives. The computer industry is not listening to the customers, but Mary Lou Jepson is.
Islam and Sharia Law are taking over the lands in modern Europe as you read this. Make the stand today and educate yourself on this dire matter!
LOL!!!! "The price of carrying it around in a man purse."
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! Ah come on man its just a purse!!!! Are you homophobic? Come on man being with another man aint so bad. I mean I've experimented and it aint so bad. Just bite the pillow when it starts to hurt.
"If it can let me surf the internet, call my wife, read a book, watch TV, take notes, draw a picture, and read my a story, it would be well worth the price - - - the price, of course, of carrying it around in a man-purse."
I would say that that's true if you're dainty.
Men like me don't need a "murse" and we don't need a fanny pack either.
I want one of these devices to be durable and hands on. I want to be able to toss it onto the car seat and stare at it while I'm sitting on the toilet and I want to be able to kill a bug with it when I'm out on the Parcourse, doing elevated pushups. I move about in the leaves and the grass. I live near a large forest preserve, and I want a tough, waterproof, scratch-resistant and dependable device that will let me sit down and look at something brilliant that I've written. I don't need a PC. I need a reader. Big difference.
-------------
www.anamericanlion.com/
I also want a reader that can take a beating. I wonder if it would be possible to design the outer shell like the rugby cell phone? they can stand up to the test. So why cant the apply that to all the new technology comming out into the world? However, they would still need to slim down the shell though. thoes phones are extremely thick.
Mary Lou Jepson is an amazing woman with an amazing story and OLPC was and is an amazingly altruistic concept worthy of the support of us all. Pixel Qi, however, I don't really get. Where are the big time product announcements to support the pub? I know they had some demos at CES and will likely at 3GSM, but outside of engaging discussions with Jepson, what's there? This isn't like OLED where they are engineering a completely new tech. My big question is why would venture folks put all kinds of money behind a lowest-common-denominator tech like pixel qi (power sucking inside, no color or video outside) instead of something like liquavista or mirasol. liquavista's a ways off, but mirasol seems like an amazing display technology equally as imminent as Jepson's Pixel Qi. www.mirasoldisplay.com
They should make the back a solar panel, for charging in places that don't have easy access to electricity, like rural Africa. A camera would be nice too, it would make for an interesting photo taking experience, because it would be like looking through a window, and saving the scene.
Don't let this woman fool you. She cares nothing for kids ... only money. The author might check with her step children. They are now adults but were barely teens when she began pursuing their married dad. There's not an altruistic bone in her body. She may be bright as an engineer but since this piece is largely personal it must be said she is a very self serving woman.
that's good news
http://www.sowaar.com/category/desktop_wallpapers خلفيات سطح المكتب
http://www.sowaar.com/category/girls-wallpapers صور بنات
http://www.sowaar.com/category/animals_wallpapers/ صور حيوانات
http://www.sowaar.com
Digital papers are becoming more appealing as we become comfortable with our new approach to communication and publication. I am interested in this machine for my daily news, yet twelve months ago I personally would have rejected the whole concept of holding a machine to read my news articles. I have arrived fully into the techno age.
www.smashhitdisplays.com