‘Dune’ tried to warn us against AI

‘Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind.’
Repeating image of skulls with increasing doubling, blurring, ghosting, pixelation, and horizontal glitching
AI is illegal in the 'Dune' universe, but not for the reasons you may think. Credit: Kathryn Conrad

Even the biggest fans of Dune know that Frank Herbert’s classic sci-fi epic quickly veers into the fantastical. Giant subterranean sandworms measuring 1,500 feet long; a narcotic that fuels interstellar travel and bends a user’s perception of space-time; a mystical cabal of eugenicist witches—the list goes on. But there is at least one story within the sprawling series that feels increasingly like a premonition rather than plot point: the Butlerian Jihad.

Taking place well before the events of Dune itself, the Butlerian Jihad was a nearly century-long, interplanetary revolt that saw humanity racing to destroy all of its advanced computers, artificial intelligence systems, and other “thinking machines.” The underlying cause wasn’t that sentient robots were attempting to eradicate humans, however. Instead, our species’ overreliance on the programs had generated an upper ruling class of technocrats that soon presided over all aspects of society. It wasn’t so much that humanity was afraid of AI, as much as they were afraid of the people who designed and controlled the AI. The Butlerian Jihad ultimately resulted in the obliteration of all thinking machines, as well as a wholesale ban on any new robotic creations.

“Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind,” reads one of the ensuing, in-universe religious texts.

Dune’s author didn’t necessarily intend the Butlerian Jihad to be an ominous warning. If anything, it was a clever way to bypass dealing with distant future AI concepts and focus on Herbert’s interests in power dynamics, gender, and societal structures. Even so, it’s hard not to get a little weirded out by a passage from Dune that is once again making the rounds on social media.

“Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them,” a character explained to protagonist Paul Atreides early in the first novel.

Whether or not life imitates art remains to be seen. That said, there’s no reason not to poke some fun at the current generation of supposed AI in the meantime:

And even if subjugation isn’t in the cards, there is an increasing body of evidence that suggests too much time with “thinking machines” is already starting to affect our own cognitive abilities

 
products on a page that says best of what's new 2025

2025 PopSci Best of What’s New