Science

The Worst Jobs of the Future

100 years from now, what jobs will people be hating?

January 22, 2009

A century from now, today's terrorist enemy has morphed into a global insurgency against all established governments. The terrorists have launched a wave of nanotech biochemical weapons. Like viruses and bacteria, the weapons are invisible to satellites, border-patrol agents and the military. Your job -- and it's a doozy -- is to defend the country against their onslaught. While nanotech cheerleaders talk of tiny cell-size machines that will someday patrol our bodies on cancer search-and-destroy missions, others (ahem) are thinking about the downside. Imagine a nano-chem weapon that moves invisibly through the nation's military-industrial complex, waging its own microscopic mission of evil. We'll be decimated before we even know what's hit us. "From an ethical point of view, it's hard to imagine scientists in this country working on a weapon like that," says Ned Thomas, an MIT professor and director of its Institute for Soldier Nano-technologies. "But if the bad guys develop it, we're in trouble." That leaves the good guys with the heavy burden of building devices that can sense alien invaders and engage in nano-a-nano combat beneath our skin. If you win, you save the free world; if you lose, we're all toast. No pressure, though.Ryan Heshka

More than one futurist has predicted that after we earthlings have used up all our natural resources, we'll be forced into mining our old capped-and-sealed trash dumps. It's going to be one stinky job. But it won't be unprecedented. In the 1980s, officials in Collier County, Florida, tried to mine their local landfill to see if they could profit from the buried paper, plastics and metal discarded years before. "It was beyond imagination in terms of disgusting," says J.W. Spear, Sr., an environmental engineer who has worked on several large-scale landfill projects. Besides dealing with the suffocating stench, landfill miners must don class-C biochem suits to contend with pockets of volatile methane gas, not to mention the highly toxic trash slurry known as leachate. "What coffee is to coffee grounds, leachate is to trash," Spear explains. "In Florida it would spray out onto the workers, and I can tell you that's no fun to work with." (To practice at home, mix motor oil, antifreeze, a soiled diaper and your kitchen garbage, then shake, stir, and spritz.) To make matters worse, the materials that Florida officials hoped to resell were so foul (duh) that there was no market for them.Ryan Heshka

Your bachelor's in science is awarded in 2040, your master's in 2042, and, after hundreds of thousands of dollars in student loans, you are awarded your doctorate in glaciology, class of 2050. Then, lo and behold, like some sort of academic Rip Van Winkle, when you are finally ready to zip up your parka and drill for core samples, the glaciers are gone. That's right: Your future job is so bad, it doesn't exist. Predictive models suggest that most of the glaciers in and around the tropics will have melted by the middle of this century. That means all the ice at Glacier National Park, on the Tibetan Plateau, in the Andes and on Mount Kilimanjaro in Africa. But there's always the Arctic, right? In the near future, sure, but in a few thousand years, according to most models, it will be gone too, the North Pole covered in water, and even the 1.8-mile block of solid ice that caps Antarctica likely to be fully melted. The good news: Oceanography promises to be booming.Ryan Heshka

NASA is planning a human mission to Mars in 20-odd years, and no doubt the four to six astronauts who visit the Red Planet will come back heroes, with sponsorship deals and calls to run for Senate. They'll deserve the glory, considering the physical and psychological torture they'll have overcome. The trip, which will last six months each way, will take a toll on the body. "You lose 5 to 20 percent of your bone mass on long spaceflights, and you lose your cardiovascular and muscular conditioning," says Jim Voss, a former NASA astronaut who logged five and a half months on the International Space Station. "It took me a couple weeks after returning before I could walk normally. I was exhausted all the time." Add to that the prospect of a year cramped inside a capsule with five other type-A personalities. Throw in radiation exposure and the foreboding sense that if something goes wrong, you're pretty much doomed. There's nobody coming to the rescue if the Mars station malfunctions. But Robert Zubrin, president of the Mars Society, which runs analogue Mars exploration stations in the Arctic and in Utah, puts the potential travails into perspective: "Is it going to be hard? Yes. Is it harder than what two million GIs went through during World War II? No. Anne Frank was stuck in a small, cramped space for six months, and there were Nazis running around outside. It's not going to be harder than that." Hey, we said it would be one of the worst jobs in science, not one of the worst things that could happen to a human being, ever.Ryan Heshka

Which of the Worst Jobs do you think is the worst? And what was the worst job you ever had? Read all about the worst jobs in science:
Worst Jobs in Science 2009
The Worst Jobs of the Future
The Worst Jobs of the Pastdaniel spils

Latest

MacOS Catalina offers new ways to watch and listen to content. Here’s how to take advantage of them.

Eight ways to make your Twitter feed less toxic

These incredible sports photos required serious camera wizardry to capture

Early climate change models held up better than you think

The best DIY kits to give as gifts

An inside look at how Magic: The Gathering Arena digitized the world’s most complex card game

NASA’s solar probe reveals stunning results after swooping in close to the sun

Five gifts for the home cook who already has everything

Here’s how PrEP medications outsmart HIV