Chang'e 4: why the moon’s far side looks red in new images | Popular Science
Want More?

Chang'e 4: why the moon’s far side looks red in new images

It's not actually dark and it's definitely not red.

the far side of the moon

The moon's far side

China National Space Administration/EPA

The first ever images taken from the surface of the far side of the moon have been released following the Chinese National Space Administration’s (CNSA) successful landing there. The lander Chang'e 4 and rover Yutu 2 follow from Chang'e 3 and the original Yutu rover that were deployed on the moon’s near side in 2013.

But if you’ve been looking closely at the pictures, you could be forgiven for thinking that the far side of the moon is red. That’s how it looks on the unprocessed images—and it’s different from other pictures of the moon, in which it appears grey. So what is going on?

Cameras on spacecraft often don’t see colors in the same way as the human eye. For example, the red, green, and blue components are usually recorded separately. This was the case with the latest images, and no color correction has been applied to take account of the different sensitivities of each set of the camera’s color detectors.

The first picture below is an example of one such “raw” image, and I’ve accompanied it with histograms of the red, green, and blue channels to show how brightness is distributed in each. In the raw version, the lunar surface looks red because the detectors used were more sensitive to red than they were to blue or green. So although in truth the surface is almost equally bright in all three colors, the green and blue detectors have been set up so as to be less sensitive to light than the red detectors. This is why the green and blue histograms do not extend to the bright end of the range of their scale.

the Yutu 2 rover

Raw Change'4 image, showing the Yutu 2 rover. Histograms of the red, green, and blue channels are shown on the right.

CNSA/HANDOUT/EPA

It is a simple matter to adjust the image to make it look more reasonable. In the next picture I have merely stretched the green and blue channels to make the bright ends of each histogram coincide more closely.

realistic color of moon's far side

A more realistic view. The same image as before after stretching the green and blue channels.

CNSA/EPA

I could have gone further, and given the surface an even bluer cast. In fact, there has been a busy discussion on Twitter about the best approach. There are certainly technically more adept approaches than mine, but all are agreed that the unadjusted color is misleading.

Calibrating colors

So how can we be sure of the color on the moon? When the Apollo astronauts took their color photographs (and in those days it was photography, using color film, rather than digital imaging like today), they placed a color calibration target containing patches of known color in the field of view. This made it possible to get the color balance right during developing and printing. When Jack Schmitt of Apollo 17 found some “orange soil” on the otherwise grey surface, its genuine orange nature could be confirmed by comparison with the colors on the calibration strip.

Orange soil photographed by an Apollo 17 astronaut

Orange soil photographed by an Apollo 17 astronaut. This is as colorful as the moon gets. Note the color calibration target.

NASA

It is a pity that CNSA did not add a color calibration strip onto the ramps of the Chang'e 4 lander, in the foreground of the pictures above. The British Beagle2 lander on Mars, which landed successfully in 2003 but failed to communicate, famously carried a color calibration target in the form of a Damien Hirst artwork. NASA’s Mars Curiosity rover carries color calibration targets too.

However, the images from the Chang'e 4 lander and the Yutu 2 rover are primarily for navigation purposes, for which getting the color right scarcely matters.

There is some useful science in measuring how well the rocks and minerals on an extraterrestrial surface reflect light of different colors, and the Yutu 2 rover carries a “visible and near infrared spectrometer” designed to do just this so we can learn more about the surface composition.

It is already known that the moon’s average surface is a slightly reddish version of dark grey, though less red than the planet Mercury and much less red than Mars, whose surface is genuinely red as a result of oxidation of iron minerals (essentially rust).

Colour perception

Knowing how the moon’s surface reflects light of different colors is only one aspect of presenting an image of a lunar landscape so that it looks right. Maybe you recall the dress color illusion that went viral in 2015. This was an image of a dress which some people believed was black and blue while others were confident it was white and gold.

It demonstrates that color perception is subjective, and also depends on context. How you see colors in the images in this article, for example, will also depend on the characteristics of the device on which you are reading it.

However, measurements show that there is very little color variation on the moon, and astronauts who have been there will all tell you that the moon is essentially drab grey (partly explaining the excitement when a layer of orange soil was spotted). When the first Chinese astronaut walks on the moon—probably sometime in the 2020s—they will most likely experience the same thing.

David Rothery is a Professor of Planetary Geosciences at The Open University. This article was originally featured on The Conversation.

The Conversation

Latest News