• Entertainment & Gaming

    The Science of Star Trek

    By Adam Weiner Posted on 12.17.2008 19 Comments

    As a long-time aficionado of the original Star Trek series, it's always exciting for me when I hear that Captain Kirk and Mr. Spock are going to make a reappearance on the big screen. Although it'll be a bit strange without William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy running the show, what recourse is there? We've got the next generation playing the previous one. Anyway, in the trailer we get a glimpse of the juvenile origins of the future Captain Kirk's daredevil thrill-seeking persona, not to mention his incredible physical prowess. In the scene in question we see young James T. leap out of his classic convertible sports coupe moments before it projects itself off of a several-thousand-foot precipice. James saves himself by gripping the sandy ground and pulling himself to a stop just as he reaches the edge of the cliff.

    12.18.2008 at 03:33pm - Comment by michaelgvh

    Could that possibly really be Dr. Tyson? If so, wow. I love your Colbert visits. I feel honored to be called a curmudgeon by you, but I think you misread my intent. I applaud the original article as well, it is one of the commenters (Thorn) to whom I was replying who implied that skidding the car would stop it faster than anti-lock brakes. This is why I went on my Kinetic versus Static friction screed. I do have a problem with the assertion that the sum of your gym workouts is enough to stop you, however. The implication is that you can do all of them at once and that you have something to push against. If you exherted that much force straight down you would fly off the ground. You need a backboard for your bech press, you need the isometric pressure to squeeze the scale. You need the ground and a back rest to push back on your leg press. A 120lb Kirk only has gravity to work with. Then again, it's Kirk. I'm sure his belt buckle added extra stopping power due to 'testicular mass.' With all that said, here's another piece... the article calculates a 78 m/s2 decleration. Assuming hands above his head sliding feet first, this would be the same type of additional downward force that fighter pilots feel. The blood would pool in his legs. The translation is about 8Gs. Trained fighter pilots WITH pressurized flight suits blackout at around 7Gs. It would probablty also rip his arms off (900lbs?), but I've overstayed my welocome here already so I won't go into that. Michael van Huystee Physics Major and born skeptic.

  • Entertainment & Gaming

    The Science of Star Trek

    By Adam Weiner Posted on 12.17.2008 19 Comments

    As a long-time aficionado of the original Star Trek series, it's always exciting for me when I hear that Captain Kirk and Mr. Spock are going to make a reappearance on the big screen. Although it'll be a bit strange without William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy running the show, what recourse is there? We've got the next generation playing the previous one. Anyway, in the trailer we get a glimpse of the juvenile origins of the future Captain Kirk's daredevil thrill-seeking persona, not to mention his incredible physical prowess. In the scene in question we see young James T. leap out of his classic convertible sports coupe moments before it projects itself off of a several-thousand-foot precipice. James saves himself by gripping the sandy ground and pulling himself to a stop just as he reaches the edge of the cliff.

    12.18.2008 at 10:26am - Comment by michaelgvh

    Thorn, did you even take Physics? The coefficient of friction is different for Static friction and Kinetic friction. When you panic stop and your tires lock up, you change the coefficient of friction from Static to Kinetic between your tires and the ground. It happens that Kinetic friction is LESS than Static. You get LESS braking power when you lock up your brakes. Why are people trying to even defend this? Even if the article is off by an order of magnitude, you can't get 90lbs of pressure from your fingers, let alone 900. Your shirt and feet aren't going to fix things. What a bunch of silly fanboys trying to cling to some belief that the movie director gives a rats ass about the physics of the shot. It's about the drama of the shot.



Download Our iPhone App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed



Become a Fan On Facebook

Share links with friends, comment on stories and more


December 2009: Best of What's New

In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.

Check out the best of what's new here.

Popular Science Photo Pool


Share your photos in the Pop Sci pool at www.flickr.com!
tags_sprite.png
POP_embeddedForm_cover_May09.jpg