What yu say is true mike cook. But can you imagne the mess it would make if it blew up on launch? I think solar power is the best way to go for now. At least until we can improve other more reliable and stable power sources.
They are probably trying to figure out what the heck the mini-DVD is too. "Hmmmm. Can we eat this? I wonder." And then when they try to eat the DVD, they'll get sick, and then declare war on earth.
NASA's Ion Engine 1. Charge the Fuel Xenon is an inert gas, seemingly useless for rocketry. Before it´s used as fuel, the engine must convert it into an electrically charged gas, also called a plasma. An electron emitter fires electrons at the xenon gas. When an electron hits a xenon atom, it strips off an additional electron from the atom´s shell to create a positively charged xenon ion.
This is so cool. It's like science fiction come to life. I love it. So I guess the old saying is true,"Today's science fiction is tomorrow's science fact."
Kind of makes you wonder where future generations are going to put all this stuff when we start colonizing the moon. We better send up a bulldozer first to push it all up in a pile. Too bad there's no recycling centers on the moon yet. There's no telling what we could build out of the scrap laying around up there.
Last night at approximately 10:26 EST, after a long buildup of preparations, the Navy took the controversial step of shooting down a dead U.S. reconnaissance satellite from its low-Earth orbit. The satellite, which is about the size of a school bus, was destroyed to prevent a potentially hazardous impact with Earth, the military has said. It was moving faster than 17,000 mph at an altitude of 133 nautical miles above the Pacific when a modified SM-3 anti-ballistic missile launched from the USS Lake Erie, a Ticonderoga-class AEGIS missile cruiser, reportedly made impact.
What the hell does the amount of fuel have to do with it? The satellite was dead, so it wasn't going to use up the fuel that it had.The fuel tank contaained hydrazine propellant, which is highly toxic. Also, the tank was designed to withstand the force of re-entry, but not the force of an impact of that magnitude if it had fallen to earth. It could have potentially killed many people when it hit if they hadn't destroyed it before it came through the atmosphere.
Everyone seems to be double-extra-cautiously optimistic about this finding, so dont go running out to your telescope tonight looking for greetings from friendly space creatures. But in work reported today in Nature, astronomers say they used the Hubble Space Telescopes infrared imager to pick up signs of methane in the atmosphere of a Jupiter-sized planet orbiting a star some 63 million light years from Earth. And methane, an organic molecule, is an indicator of the possible presence of life.
The article said,"methane, an organic molecule, is an indicator of the possible presence of life." It didn't say there couldn't be life because of methane. The probability of no life is due to the closeness of the planet's sun. This is really cool. I think it's great that scientists can detect what's in a planet's atmosphere from so far away.
The search for a planet analogous to our own has taken one step closer with the discovery of the smallest extrasolar planet yet orbiting a star which could support life. It is about three and one-third times the size of Earth, much more in line with our home than the gas giants on the scale of Jupiter or Saturn we had been finding up to this point. (An even smaller planet has so far been found, but it is orbiting a pulsar. Pulsars spew highly powerful radiation, so it's highly unlikely that anything within their vicinity could survive).
To start with, the planet they were talking about might support life is not the one orbiting the pulsar. And they did not say "it can't support life because of the radiation". They said it was "highly unlikely" that it could support life due to the massive radiation. The planet speculated to have water,"orbits a dwarf star, which is many thousands of times less bright that our Sun. Still, the planet could have a thick atmosphere—like Venus—which would insulate what little heat was available." They never said there was life there, only that it could possibly support life. They don't even know what the atmosphere is actually like. It's all just speculation at this point. I think some people need to learn to read the entire article and not just the title if you're going to comment. At least that way, you might know what you're commenting on instead of throwing random thoughts out that have nothing to do whatsoever with the material content.
When it launches in 2009, NASA's Kepler Mission will include the most sensitive detection system ever put into service for discovering exosolar planets. In the meantime, our toolkit on Earth is getting better with each passing year. Astronomers using the High Accuracy Radial velocity Planet Searcher (HARPS) at La Silla Observatory in Chile have discovered three new rocky planets orbiting a single star, all within ten times the size of Earth.
Ummm. Am I missing something here, or did the article just say that they found three planets similar in size to earth? I apparentely missed the part where they said the planets had breathable atmospheres, landmasses, and probably the most important part, water. Duh!! Learn to read the whole story people. Not just the title.
The Department of Defense has put out a call: design a pack of robots. A so-called Multi-Robot Pursuit System would be used to "search for and detect a non-cooperative human subject." Each robot has to weigh 100 kilograms or less, act autonomously (with a human squad leader), negotiate obstacles, and provide immediate feedback. The robots would report back to a human operator, and defer to that human when the robot AI determines that a "difficult decision" is required.
Is this the roots for Cyberdyne and Skynet? Let's hope not.
In space, no one can hear a tardigrade scream. They can, however see the tiny organisms (also called water bears) survive a trip through that icy, radiation filled void relatively unscathed.
Cool!! Water bears in space. Ain't that great!! Who knew they were such hardy little critters?
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.
Check out the best of what's new here.