• Science

    What You Need to Know About Voting Machines

    By Jason Daley Posted on 10.30.2008 10 Comments

    After several centuries of casting and counting ballots, it’s shocking that we still haven’t mastered what seems to be a simple task. But anyone who lived through the 2000 presidential election, in which a mishmash of flawed voting machines, contradictory county procedures, and unclear state laws in Florida led to the least reliable outcome in history, knows that 21st century voting is no better than the era when we shouted out our votes at the courthouse steps.

    11.1.2008 at 11:35pm - Comment by owades

    Having an electronic voting machine print out a paper receipt for the voter to check before it's deposited into a "ballot box" is indeed a good idea. Indeed, that's the basis of what's called a "Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail," or "VVPAT." Computer Scientist Rebecca Mercuri has been promoting this concept for many years: see http://www.notablesoftware.com/evote.html for information. Most people who have studied the various alternatives for voting end up favoring the simplicity of optically-scanned paper ballots over any type of electronic voting machines. With paper ballots, you have the advantage of a built-in paper audit trail. In addition, many people can mark their ballots simultaneously at the polling place--a paper-ballot system is much less likely to produce long waits on election day than one that depends on a fixed number of expensive touch-screen machines. Electronic machines can be used by some handicapped voters who can't mark paper ballots without assistance. But even here, the machine can print out a paper ballot to be scanned along with the ordinary hand-marked ballots.

  • Science

    What You Need to Know About Voting Machines

    By Jason Daley Posted on 10.30.2008 10 Comments

    After several centuries of casting and counting ballots, it’s shocking that we still haven’t mastered what seems to be a simple task. But anyone who lived through the 2000 presidential election, in which a mishmash of flawed voting machines, contradictory county procedures, and unclear state laws in Florida led to the least reliable outcome in history, knows that 21st century voting is no better than the era when we shouted out our votes at the courthouse steps.

    10.31.2008 at 11:30pm - Comment by owades

    The requirements for a good voting system are not as simple or straightforward as one might think at first. As an example, if the voting machine prints out a receipt for the voter, the voter could be subject to bribery and/or coersion. Without a receipt as proof, no third party can be sure that you voted the way they wanted you to. That's an important reason why no receipts can be provided.



Download Our iPhone App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed



Become a Fan On Facebook

Share links with friends, comment on stories and more


December 2009: Best of What's New

In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.

Check out the best of what's new here.

Popular Science Photo Pool


Share your photos in the Pop Sci pool at www.flickr.com!
tags_sprite.png
POP_embeddedForm_cover_May09.jpg