Comments

  • SciTech

    The First Few Minutes After Death

    By Sam Barrett Posted on 10.31.2008 20 Comments

    After countless accounts of near-death experiences, dating as far back as ancient Greece, science is now taking serious steps forward to explore the nature of the phenomenon. A new project aims to determine whether the experience is a physiological event or evidence that the human consciousness is far more complicated than we ever believed.

    Article Rating:
    5
    10.31.2008 at 10:03am - Comment by trueperspective

    I am very excited to see the results of this study. It is about time that science is taking a look at phenomina outside of the physical relm. For the naturalist, there is nothing but the physical matter, which can explain everything. But, I think that this experiment will show that there is more then the physical material, and that humans have consciousness outside of the body. This will definitly be the case if the patients are able to recall the images on the shelves. This will put a big question mark toward evolution and naturalism as far as how this can be. I suggest that the study will prove what many already know to be true; that there is a non-physical reality as well as a physical one. Further, that humans, as a "soul" or "consciousness" continue to exist post death of the body. Great to see this type of study being undertaken.

  • SciTech

    Does Science Obviate Religion?

    By Greg Soltis Posted on 9.29.2008 66 Comments

    Last Monday at New York's Pierre Hotel, outspoken atheist Christopher Hitchens and physicist/theologian Monsignor Lorenzo Albacete met to tackle the question of whether or not science makes belief in God obsolete. According to the forum's hosts, Newsweek editor Jon Meacham and Washington Post columnist Sally Quinn, religion riles its vilifiers when it makes truth claims without evidence -- at least evidence that would hold up in a court of science. The conflict seems to stem from a difference in understanding as to what evidence and truth truly are.

    Article Rating:
    5
    10.10.2008 at 10:50am - Comment by trueperspective

    Foyle, yes I do believe in a literal 6 day creation. Which I believe makes the earth between 6000 to 10000 years old (depending on how you take the data). Many have recently tried to say that it was not 6 days due to the science seeming to suggest that it could not be, but from the beggining it was assumed 6 literal 24 hour time periods. So, what about those stars billions of light years away? I think I can shed some light on this subject (no pun intended)Well, it is well known that our awsome solar system is very near to the center of the universe. You must understand creation in this way. When God spoke the words, "Let there be light" At that moment there came into existince all the matter that makes up the universe. This happened in an explosive way. Matter bursting fourth at the word of God. Even the Bible talks about the universe expanding. The reference is in Isaiah. So, that answers the cosmic microwave background question. What about star light? After all they weren't made until the fourth day. There has been lots of explainations as to how we can see stars so far away, such as God made the light in-transit. These types of assumptions don't really explain things to well. Here is my explaination. Many people assume that time flows at the same rate in all conditions. At first, this seems like a very reasonable assumption. But, in fact, this assumption is false. And there are a few different ways in which the nonrigid nature of time could allow distant starlight to reach earth within the biblical timescale. Albert Einstein discovered that the rate at which time passes is affected by motion and by gravity. For example, when an object moves very fast, close to the speed of light, its time is slowed down. This is called “time-dilation.” So, if we were able to accelerate a clock to nearly the speed of light, that clock would tick very slowly. If we could somehow reach the speed of light, the clock would stop completely. This isn’t a problem with the clock; the effect would happen regardless of the clock’s particular construction because it is time itself that is slowed. Likewise, gravity slows the passage of time. A clock at sea-level would tick slower than one on a mountain, since the clock at sea-level is closer to the source of gravity. It seems hard to believe that velocity or gravity would affect the passage of time since our everyday experience cannot detect this. After all, when we are traveling in a vehicle, time appears to flow at the same rate as when we are standing still. But that’s because we move so slowly compared to the speed of light, and the earth’s gravity is so weak that the effects of time-dilation are correspondingly tiny. However, the effects of time-dilation have been measured with atomic clocks. Since time can flow at different rates from different points of view, events that would take a long time as measured by one person will take very little time as measured by another person. This also applies to distant starlight. Light that would take billions of years to reach earth (as measured by clocks in deep space) could reach earth in only thousands of years as measured by clocks on earth. This would happen naturally if the earth is in a gravitational well, which we will discuss below. Many secular astronomers assume that the universe is infinitely big and has an infinite number of galaxies. This has never been proven, nor is there evidence that would lead us naturally to that conclusion. So, it is a leap of “blind” faith on their part. However, if we make a different assumption instead, it leads to a very different conclusion. Suppose that our solar system is located near the center of a finite distribution of galaxies. Although this cannot be proven for certain at present, it is fully consistent with the evidence; so it is a reasonable possibility. In that case, the earth would be in a gravitational well. This term means that it would require energy to pull something away from our position into deeper space. In this gravitational well, we would not “feel” any extra gravity, nonetheless time would flow more slowly on earth (or anywhere in our solar system) than in other places of the universe. This effect is thought to be very small today; however, it may have been much stronger in the past. (If the universe is expanding as most astronomers believe, then physics demands that such effects would have been stronger when the universe was smaller). This being the case, clocks on earth would have ticked much more slowly than clocks in deep space. Thus, light from the most distant galaxies would arrive on earth in only a few thousand years as measured by clocks on earth. This idea is certainly intriguing. And although there are still a number of mathematical details that need to be worked out, the premise certainly is reasonable. Some creation scientists are actively researching this idea.

  • SciTech

    Does Science Obviate Religion?

    By Greg Soltis Posted on 9.29.2008 66 Comments

    Last Monday at New York's Pierre Hotel, outspoken atheist Christopher Hitchens and physicist/theologian Monsignor Lorenzo Albacete met to tackle the question of whether or not science makes belief in God obsolete. According to the forum's hosts, Newsweek editor Jon Meacham and Washington Post columnist Sally Quinn, religion riles its vilifiers when it makes truth claims without evidence -- at least evidence that would hold up in a court of science. The conflict seems to stem from a difference in understanding as to what evidence and truth truly are.

    Article Rating:
    5
    10.9.2008 at 04:05pm - Comment by trueperspective

    I have heard alot of bold statements from both sides claiming to know all there is about what they believe. I am a seminary student working on my masters in Advanced Biblical Studies. I know I'm coming into the debate late, but I will answer questions for those that have them. Just ask one at a time. By the way Ian1108 is a very smart and reasonable person. He or she is very misguided as well. I welcome your critiques.

Flickr Block Header

Share your photos in the Pop Sci pool at www.flickr.com!
Our latest winner

Subscribe for 2 free issues!

POP_embeddedForm_cover_Dec08.jpg