PopSci.com welcomes back Dr. Bill Chameides, dean of Duke’s Nicholas School of the Environment. Dr. Chameides blogs at The Green Grok to spark lively discussions about environmental science, keeping you in the know on what the scientific world is discovering and how it affects you – all in plain language and, hopefully, with a bit of fun. Now, PopSci.com partners with The Green Grok to bring you exclusive new blog posts a week before they hit the Grok's blog. Give it a read and get in on the discussion!
I thought because of the melting glaciers that the ratio of salt to fresh water was diminishing, causing some current that regulates tempatures to not work as well causing global cooling, i'm not sure though but I had heard that somewhere.
I challenge you: Name one fact you still remember from the last test for which you crammed. Anyone? Any fact?
I agree if you just pay attention in the class you ussualy should know everything on a test. I only study if I know I don't know a part of it so a ussually don't cram. But on really simple things like maching craming can work but. It can't be to much material.
The economy is down and global warming is up. Instead of tackling the two problems individually, some lawmakers are looking to link the two activities together in what is proving to be an opportunity to fix both. In California, they are killing the two proverbial birds with one law, or in this case, many energy-efficiency policies.
I think that both Mcain and Obama wouldn't help stop global warming enough, there was a study done that said that if we don't stop 100% of our co2 emissions by 2050 we would go down a path of no return were less and less of the sun's rays would be reflected due to not enough ice melting thus resulting in more melting ice and obama said that he would reduce it by 80% by 2050, which isn't enough. Mcain would only have it 60% below 1990 levels.
Plans for cap-and-trade, carbon taxes, and other financial tools to curb global warming may float in and out of the national forum. But on a more local level, a price has already been placed on greenhouse gas emissions; it's $3.07 per ton.
I like the idea of a carbon tax as long as the money was spent to find green solutions.
Dear EarthTalk: Is using nitrogen to inflate my car's tires really better for the environment than using air? And if so, how? -- Roger Mawdsley, Abbotsville, BC
I'm not sure i would have to look into it more, but, even if it did i'm pretty sure it wouldn't be a huge diffrence. THough i may be wrong.
Last Monday at New York's Pierre Hotel, outspoken atheist Christopher Hitchens and physicist/theologian Monsignor Lorenzo Albacete met to tackle the question of whether or not science makes belief in God obsolete. According to the forum's hosts, Newsweek editor Jon Meacham and Washington Post columnist Sally Quinn, religion riles its vilifiers when it makes truth claims without evidence -- at least evidence that would hold up in a court of science. The conflict seems to stem from a difference in understanding as to what evidence and truth truly are.
I don't think it makes it obsolete unless you believe in the big bang, or at least part of it, if you believe god caused the big bang then both science and religeon can coexist at least if your christian.
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.
Check out the best of what's new here.