• Science

    Singularity Summit 2009: Just How's This Thing Gonna Work, Anyways?

    By Stuart Fox Posted on 10.5.2009 10 Comments

    Since I got here, I've been wondering what exactly the Singularity's going to look like. How are we going to create artificial intelligence, and when we do, how are we going to integrate ourselves with this advanced technology? Luckily, NYU philosopher David Chalmers was there to break it all down.

    10.4.2009 at 12:15am - Comment by siowena

    "This will start a chain reaction that quickly leads to a digital intelligence far greater than anything we ever imagined." Any discussion on where we humans are in this process? Maybe the 'created in him image' is a leak into our world from the previous intelligent species. Why do we assume we are the start? Given the number of artificial/virtual worlds we already create at our limited tech/intelligence level - the odds are we are ourselves a virtual world created by some greater intelligence. Maybe we are their equivalent of SIMs (great) or some war game e.g. RISK (not-so-great). Maybe they are disappointed with our progress and are about to pull the plug!

  • Gadgets

    How The Apple Tablet Could Ruin Computing

    By Tom Conlon Posted on 8.6.2009 92 Comments

    Though whispers of an Apple tablet device practically predate Australopithecus, this week they’ve reached a fever pitch. It’s been reported by several news outlets that the supposed iTablet will feature a 10-inch touchscreen, both Wi-Fi and 3G data, and a custom ARM processor. It’s already been priced at $800 and even greenlit by none other than His Majesty Steve Jobs for a September release. Not one iota of this has been officially confirmed, but the prospect of a Mac Tablet seems more within reach than ever before. This is not a good thing. If an Apple tablet is ever actually released, we should all be very concerned for the future of what most of us take for granted today: our digital freedom.

    8.7.2009 at 11:47am - Comment by siowena

    For those that don't know, in France it is illegal for there to be exclusive agreements between carriers and handset manufacturers. Therefore the iphone is available to be used on all networks. If all carriers have to conform to FCC regs, and likewise all handsets have to conform to FCC regs, why do the carriers get to decide which handset you can use on their network and also what features you can use? It's a bit like buying a car and then only being able to use one brand of gas. Cars work with all brands of gas, all TVs work with all transmissions, all electrical devices work in all sockets in the country. Why? Because of Federal standards both sides have to confirm to. Why is it different for carriers? Why not like France? What happened to competition in the 'land of the free'?

  • Gadgets

    How The Apple Tablet Could Ruin Computing

    By Tom Conlon Posted on 8.6.2009 92 Comments

    Though whispers of an Apple tablet device practically predate Australopithecus, this week they’ve reached a fever pitch. It’s been reported by several news outlets that the supposed iTablet will feature a 10-inch touchscreen, both Wi-Fi and 3G data, and a custom ARM processor. It’s already been priced at $800 and even greenlit by none other than His Majesty Steve Jobs for a September release. Not one iota of this has been officially confirmed, but the prospect of a Mac Tablet seems more within reach than ever before. This is not a good thing. If an Apple tablet is ever actually released, we should all be very concerned for the future of what most of us take for granted today: our digital freedom.

    8.7.2009 at 11:41am - Comment by siowena

    HenryT "Ipods will die out when other manufacturers create mp3 players that are just as well designed because they will be less restrictive." You can use ipods with mp3 - I do and also use my Creative Zen. As for the design, why is it taking the other manufacturers so long to come up with something "as well designed"? How long is it going to take? As for the restrictions, remember Microsoft's play-for-sure restrictive DRM, much worse than what apple came with. BUT in Apple, Microsoft, Creative (and others') defence, the restrictions are there because the Record Industry demanded it. Finally, the Record Industry has seen the light and moving towards and more enlightened (and less-restrictive) approach.

  • Gadgets

    How The Apple Tablet Could Ruin Computing

    By Tom Conlon Posted on 8.6.2009 92 Comments

    Though whispers of an Apple tablet device practically predate Australopithecus, this week they’ve reached a fever pitch. It’s been reported by several news outlets that the supposed iTablet will feature a 10-inch touchscreen, both Wi-Fi and 3G data, and a custom ARM processor. It’s already been priced at $800 and even greenlit by none other than His Majesty Steve Jobs for a September release. Not one iota of this has been officially confirmed, but the prospect of a Mac Tablet seems more within reach than ever before. This is not a good thing. If an Apple tablet is ever actually released, we should all be very concerned for the future of what most of us take for granted today: our digital freedom.

    8.7.2009 at 11:35am - Comment by siowena

    What is all this anti/pro-mac, or anti/pro-windows? I have a Sony DVD, it sucks, why can I not load VNC on it? Why can't we not run programs on the Amazon Kindle? How about loading the Ferrari engine management software into a Ford system (I am sure they all only use a limited number of embedded silicon). The iphone is a device and is available to do what it does. They are up-front about what can/can't be done. Likewise the apple tablet will/may be. Likewise, if you wish to jail-break the iphone (or any other device) - you own it so go ahead, just don't expect the manufacturer to support you when it goes wrong. Like all 'devices', if you like it and it does what you need/want it to do, then buy/use it. If not, then buy something else. This anti-"walled-garden" is a bit like buy a Ferrari and then castigating Ferrari because you can't use it as a pick-up. As for the FCC, I wish they would investigate the carrier/hand-set relationship - anyone seen what can be done in France? It should all be like that!!!

  • Cars

    Flying Saucers Come Home

    By SciIll Staff Posted on 11.17.2008 28 Comments

    It’s designed to seat two, take off and land vertically, fly 10 feet above the ground, and reach 75 miles an hour. It’s about the size of a car, but it’s round instead of boxy. Yup, it’s a flying saucer. Next year, California-based Moller International hopes to introduce the M200G personal recreation craft, the first of what the company expects to be a full line of “volanters”—vertical-takeoff-and-landing aircraft. The design is 300 years in the making.

    11.5.2008 at 05:28am - Comment by siowena

    Moller - does he not ever give up. Six engines, 100% power and 1 person @ 10feet. The same power in a light aircraft gives 100miles @ 100mph at least with 2-4 persons. If the aircraft engines give out it won't fall out the sky like a brick unlike this contraption. This will never be given to the public. Even with auto-control, ask the emergency services how many people they help after running out of gas. No auto-system in the world is going to keep it in the air without gas! As for the military, most weapon systems are moving to infra-red for seek and this has six engines - just look at the harrier/JSF in IR when hovering. Helicopters are more efficient and there have smaller engines and therefore smaller IR. The hele engine does not provide direct lift and therefore it's exhaust can be cooled to some degree with diffusers. The more I look at this, the more I think - if it was a good idea Boeing would have adopted in for the 787. I believe there are aerodynamic issues with round wings, but don't know the details. Please stop giving this concept airtime.

  • Science

    Readers Ask . . .

    By Posted on 7.30.2008 26 Comments

    PopSci reader aaronmrosen wonders: "when it comes to wind farms, can too many props actually slow down the wind, and cause a change in weather patterns?" What do you think? Wind power: good or evil? Discuss in the comments section. Submit your science and technology questions to fyi@popsci.com.

    7.31.2008 at 11:08am - Comment by siowena

    We've been changing the wind patterns ever since we cut more trees than are grown in replacement, then there are the tall buildings. Personally, given UK was once full of forest and by removing trees, we allow the north Atlantic winds to scream across the open fields until they hit someone's house ... the more wind turbines removing that energy may just reduce the frequency and size of storms and hurricanes. A



Download Our iPhone App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed



Become a Fan On Facebook

Share links with friends, comment on stories and more


December 2009: Best of What's New

In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.

Check out the best of what's new here.

Popular Science Photo Pool


Share your photos in the Pop Sci pool at www.flickr.com!
tags_sprite.png
POP_embeddedForm_cover_May09.jpg