Since I got here, I've been wondering what exactly the Singularity's going to look like. How are we going to create artificial intelligence, and when we do, how are we going to integrate ourselves with this advanced technology? Luckily, NYU philosopher David Chalmers was there to break it all down.
"This will start a chain reaction that quickly leads to a digital intelligence far greater than anything we ever imagined." Any discussion on where we humans are in this process? Maybe the 'created in him image' is a leak into our world from the previous intelligent species. Why do we assume we are the start? Given the number of artificial/virtual worlds we already create at our limited tech/intelligence level - the odds are we are ourselves a virtual world created by some greater intelligence. Maybe we are their equivalent of SIMs (great) or some war game e.g. RISK (not-so-great). Maybe they are disappointed with our progress and are about to pull the plug!
For those that don't know, in France it is illegal for there to be exclusive agreements between carriers and handset manufacturers. Therefore the iphone is available to be used on all networks. If all carriers have to conform to FCC regs, and likewise all handsets have to conform to FCC regs, why do the carriers get to decide which handset you can use on their network and also what features you can use? It's a bit like buying a car and then only being able to use one brand of gas. Cars work with all brands of gas, all TVs work with all transmissions, all electrical devices work in all sockets in the country. Why? Because of Federal standards both sides have to confirm to. Why is it different for carriers? Why not like France? What happened to competition in the 'land of the free'?
HenryT "Ipods will die out when other manufacturers create mp3 players that are just as well designed because they will be less restrictive." You can use ipods with mp3 - I do and also use my Creative Zen. As for the design, why is it taking the other manufacturers so long to come up with something "as well designed"? How long is it going to take? As for the restrictions, remember Microsoft's play-for-sure restrictive DRM, much worse than what apple came with. BUT in Apple, Microsoft, Creative (and others') defence, the restrictions are there because the Record Industry demanded it. Finally, the Record Industry has seen the light and moving towards and more enlightened (and less-restrictive) approach.
What is all this anti/pro-mac, or anti/pro-windows? I have a Sony DVD, it sucks, why can I not load VNC on it? Why can't we not run programs on the Amazon Kindle? How about loading the Ferrari engine management software into a Ford system (I am sure they all only use a limited number of embedded silicon). The iphone is a device and is available to do what it does. They are up-front about what can/can't be done. Likewise the apple tablet will/may be. Likewise, if you wish to jail-break the iphone (or any other device) - you own it so go ahead, just don't expect the manufacturer to support you when it goes wrong. Like all 'devices', if you like it and it does what you need/want it to do, then buy/use it. If not, then buy something else. This anti-"walled-garden" is a bit like buy a Ferrari and then castigating Ferrari because you can't use it as a pick-up. As for the FCC, I wish they would investigate the carrier/hand-set relationship - anyone seen what can be done in France? It should all be like that!!!
Moller - does he not ever give up. Six engines, 100% power and 1 person @ 10feet. The same power in a light aircraft gives 100miles @ 100mph at least with 2-4 persons. If the aircraft engines give out it won't fall out the sky like a brick unlike this contraption. This will never be given to the public. Even with auto-control, ask the emergency services how many people they help after running out of gas. No auto-system in the world is going to keep it in the air without gas! As for the military, most weapon systems are moving to infra-red for seek and this has six engines - just look at the harrier/JSF in IR when hovering. Helicopters are more efficient and there have smaller engines and therefore smaller IR. The hele engine does not provide direct lift and therefore it's exhaust can be cooled to some degree with diffusers. The more I look at this, the more I think - if it was a good idea Boeing would have adopted in for the 787. I believe there are aerodynamic issues with round wings, but don't know the details. Please stop giving this concept airtime.
PopSci reader aaronmrosen wonders: "when it comes to wind farms, can too many props actually slow down the wind, and cause a change in weather patterns?" What do you think? Wind power: good or evil? Discuss in the comments section. Submit your science and technology questions to fyi@popsci.com.
We've been changing the wind patterns ever since we cut more trees than are grown in replacement, then there are the tall buildings. Personally, given UK was once full of forest and by removing trees, we allow the north Atlantic winds to scream across the open fields until they hit someone's house ... the more wind turbines removing that energy may just reduce the frequency and size of storms and hurricanes. A
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.
Check out the best of what's new here.