The famed molecular biologist Francis Crick turned to neuroscience in the 1970’s. But by 1993, he was so chagrined by the ignorance of his new field that he penned an editorial in the journal Nature. “It is intolerable that we do not have [a connection map of] the human brain,” he wrote. “Without it there is little hope of understanding how our brains work except in the crudest way.” There was no such map in 1993 because the only way to get one was to use anatomical methods: inject dye into the brain of an organism, kill it, and trace the color trail in the neurons with microscopes. Of course ethics rule out this sort of experimentation on humans.
Just a strange thought... Perhaps in the future, Scientists will be able to simulate the human brain on a conventional computer. Although it's impossible to exactly simulate a person's mind (The Uncertainty Principle) a fairly accurate representation should suffice. This simulation would have much better memory and faster processing time then a human brain. I think a simulation like this would be able to evolve itself "intelligence-wise" almost exponentially. Imagine a daisy chained network of these brains working together ?? Where will this leave the human race?? :)
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.
Check out the best of what's new here.