• Science

    Capitol Hill's Nerd in Chief

    By Posted on 7.11.2008 10 Comments

    Representative Rush Holt of New Jersey has served in Congress for a decade, but he’s not your average politico. The physicist is a five-time Jeopardy champion, an inventor of a solar collector, an arms-control expert and a former assistant director of the Princeton Plasma Physics Lab. He likes to pop into science conferences so that he can drop terms like “impedance matching” and not catch weird stares.

    7.16.2008 at 05:19pm - Comment by CEFinkJr

    Gregory Mone and Rush Holt are pushing here for government funding of research --- your tax dollars at work --- and imply that, without government funding, progress will not be made. ("Our economy is fueled by innovation, yet, Holt contends, we’re not laying the groundwork for future breakthroughs.") Wouldn't a whole series of American inventors from Benjamin Franklin, George Washington Carver, Eli Whitney, Thomas Edison, et al be surprised that they had made no breakthroughs? No government subsidies were needed to propel this nation to economic dominance of the world; only free enterprise without government shackling individual initiative.

  • Science

    Capitol Hill's Nerd in Chief

    By Posted on 7.11.2008 10 Comments

    Representative Rush Holt of New Jersey has served in Congress for a decade, but he’s not your average politico. The physicist is a five-time Jeopardy champion, an inventor of a solar collector, an arms-control expert and a former assistant director of the Princeton Plasma Physics Lab. He likes to pop into science conferences so that he can drop terms like “impedance matching” and not catch weird stares.

    7.16.2008 at 05:06pm - Comment by CEFinkJr

    "...computer scientists pointed out to Congress that these electronic voting machines can’t be audited because there’s no record of the voters’ intentions. There’s no way of checking the actual numerical electronic count against the voters’ intentions." Shocking! Electronic voting machines can’t be audited! There’s no record of the voters’ intentions! How terrible! Congress has to do something (to make sure elections turn out the way they want?) Pardon my sarcasm above but it was my understanding that we enjoyed a secret ballot in this country. The only legal audit of voter intentions is the total number of votes cast for or against a candidate or an issue. As for checking the count, electronic voting actually makes it easier to verify that the total number of votes cast does not exceed the number of voters. Electronic voting also eliminates questions that arise when a voter changes his mind in the voting booth. The machine allows you to do this with no question of erasures not being complete or of "hanging chad".



Download Our iPhone App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed



Become a Fan On Facebook

Share links with friends, comment on stories and more


December 2009: Best of What's New

In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.

Check out the best of what's new here.

Popular Science Photo Pool


Share your photos in the Pop Sci pool at www.flickr.com!
tags_sprite.png
POP_embeddedForm_cover_May09.jpg