As a followup to last week’s discussion of the new Star Trek movie trailer, let’s spend a few more minutes on this most appealing of themes. Now remember we have nothing but affection for the phenomenon of Star Trek, and the creators of the various series, movies etc. sometimes really give it a shot with trying to connect the technology to ideas in the forefront of modern physics. Where would we be without anti-matter reactors, the warp drive, and inertial dampers, to name a few?
Great topic, but I feel like I’ve stumbled across Sheldon and Leonard’s blog from ‘Big Bang’. I loved Star Trek’s thought provoking world as a teen in the 60’s, but was floored when, in the late 60’s, the army announced they were experimenting with energy beams that were shot ‘out of phase’. Oh… that’s a Phaser, I thought, and thought more of the show after that. And remember – this was way back in the low-tech 60’s. Anyone remember a moment of genius from early SNL, where Kirk + Crew were under attack… by what turned out to be the most heartless invaders of all - network suits coming to cancel the show. Amidst all the futuristic gear on ST, the attacker’s ship of choice, seen racing up from behind on the bridge’s monitor, no matter what warp speed Kirk requested or what he blasted it with, was a late model Chrysler Imperial (more of a boat. This was Chrysler’s huge luxury model – with more fins and protuberances than the Enterprise - the vehicle of choice for over-inflated ego-types, carbon based or not). A lot of the show is a bit embarrassing to remember now, like a lot of things from our teen years, but Roddenberry knew how to keep us discussing this show, 40 years later.
A curious shift occurs during and right after a war: more boys tend to be born than girls. It’s been documented for decades in many nations, especially during long conflicts with many troops deployed. The cause of this boy boom has long flummoxed thinkers and scientists. Ideas have veered from the theological—a divine call for new men to replace those lost in battle—to the coital—returning soldiers have lots of sex, and so will be more likely to fertilize at a time in their ladies’ cycle that’s ripe for making boy babies.
20 some years ago I read of a study that said societies under stress start breeding sooner. I think the point was that hormones were produced earlier to replace the population sooner. To me it helped explain why children of the poor, the disenfranchised, fatherless and hopeless, often living in violent neighborhoods, might start having sex at a very young age. We know better now, tho. We simply blame it on TV and Democrats. (haha) And WOW to that powerful photo. You just know that somehow a male child was forming in the nurse's belly at that very moment!
Any projectile fired at Angela would be 'bent' by the combined mental fusion of her manager and support staff. They wouldn't want their golden swan to die!
Think back to your college years. Did you spend more time at the lab bench than at the bar? Was getting a date harder than organic chem? If you carried protection was it for your pocket? We thought so.
Someone in the Atlanta paper said today... 'I'd be more proud of that Athens college (UGA) if they'd ring the bell for academic wins'. (guess they ring it after a football win?) Well, it's not getting laid, but it would be a start to show we think there is honor in education. The reality appeared in the next article... '$17.7 million for Tech coach'. 'A year after he signed a seven-year contract worth about $1.6 million annually, Johnson received a new deal from GA Tech that was made official Thursday. It added another year and increased his pay to an annual average of about $2.45 million.' Nice 53% pay raise, guy! That's right - Georgia's premier technical school. Guess even in geeksville the jocks still get the girls and the glory.
If you started just before the first dinosaurs appeared, you’d probably be finishing your hike just about now.
I love photos from space, and used to think about the view when I walked by the 8x15' map on the wall at work. Bored, I calculated how high my view would be from a scale 3' away. I later taped a piece of paper showing how high various things were, to scale. I think the shuttle (at 200mi) was 1.4 inch high. The moon would have been in the parking lot. I love little factoids like this. =========== If a globe is 12” dia…- 12” =8000 mi diameter-- 1”=667 mi What ---- How high ------ Above globe surface breathable air limit ~3 mile ( 12-14,000’) = .004” (sounds rather fragile!) space begins= 100 mi ( 80-100 mi) = .15” space shuttle= 250 mi avg (190-350 mi)= .37” geosynchronous satellite== 22,000 mi = 33” moon= 250,000 mi = 31 Feet ( =375”)
Snug in Earth’s orbit, Hubble is free from the background glare that earthly telescopes must fight to see the stars. This allows its supersensitive camera to take better photos of galaxies farther away—and thus much dimmer—than any optical telescope on the ground can. But despite being closer to the moon than any other telescope, there’s no way the scope could snap a photo of that one small step man took 40 years ago.
Sure thing! Let's spend a few megabillion for a moon landing - just so you can 'believe'. Except, something still won't seem right to you, and maybe another trip will convince you... Perhaps recreating the Holocaust is in order, like how could that have ever happen??? There have been so many in our history, what's another. Any volunteers? Remember to bring your family and their families with you. (and the storks that brought them) What is so hard to understand about a moon landing? Hard, yes. Complex, check. The country fell asleep after the first few. If they were faked, do you think they would go to the bother of continuing with the ruse when no one cared?
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.
Check out the best of what's new here.