• Gadgets

    Double A-OK

    By Tom Conlon Posted on 10.24.2008 16 Comments

    I bet the ’80s was a good decade for Energizer, Duracell and their ilk. I mean, it was a good decade for sharkskin, too, but the ’80s had to be the absolute peak for these battery makers. Suddenly, it seemed like everything required portable juice: that new-fangled wireless TV remote, the Walkman, my futuristic calculator watch and, of course, all of those awesomely high-tech electronic toys like Simon (which actually had its launch party at Studio 54!).

    10.26.2008 at 12:09am - Comment by Vailhem@aol.com

    Though it is an annoyance, I like the ability for manufacturers to control design of their device by controlling design of their batteries. The devices have ended up much sleeker and ergonomic (mostly) than their equivalent just a decade ago, let alone the '80's. I think the solution has been mentioned. Instead of a standard form battery, how about a standard form power interface. I've read where most smart phone manufacturers are going to make their power design USB. The iPod was on the right idea before with their firewire interface, then they came up with their own proprietary form that still ends up just being USB. All computers have at least one USB port, some, thats all they have, other than power. Esp with USB 3.0's specs increasing its power rating so that more devices can be powered solely by USB 3.0, it makes even more sense. USB plugs are universal, you could use a multitude of USB battery packs I've seen (example: http://tinyurl.com/65ut52 ) which can then be swapped with as many batteries (rechargeable or otherwise) you care to purchase or carry around with you. Standardization of plugs, not batteries is the way to go.

  • Technology

    The Military's Mystery Machine

    By Posted on 6.18.2008 26 Comments

    If the paranoid blogosphere is to be believed, every morning a group of plasma-physics grad students wakes up at a research facility in Gakona, Alaska, 200 miles north of Anchorage, and prepares for another day of playing God. It’s cold, dark as a mineshaft in winter, and the day’s work does little to cheer the mood. Depending on the unpredictable agendas of military scientists, this group of technicians must shoot radio waves into the upper reaches of our atmosphere to create missile shields, eviscerate enemy satellites, set off the occasional earthquake, or control the minds of millions of people.

    7.7.2008 at 08:12pm - Comment by Vailhem@aol.com

    I have been reading about HAARP for a few years now, and, yes, I first heard about it from an NPR interview where the interviewed suggested that it was, in fact, a 'death ray from above' that was generated from HAARP that 'shot down' the World Trade Center towers. Thats right! It was so crazy it motivated me to look it up. Most of the information I initially learned was similar to what the PopSci article says. Basically its a measuring device for the ionosphere as well as long range submarine communications. The implications of this were based upon the principal, as stated in the PopSci article, that you can 'bounce' radio waves off of the curvature of the planet to end up at varying angles... anywhere in the world you want them, ie directly above your own subs, much like aiming a pool ball on a pool table. This makes perfect sense for multiple purposes, least of which would be stealth; which, by default, wraps it in secrecy. The next was something added to that. It is an ionospheric heater. It HEATS the ionosphere. It does this using frequency ranges similar, and encompassing, those of a standard microwave oven. Heat the water vapor around an area long enough and you could, in fact, create boiling temperatures, over a long enough period of time to shoot down missiles or topple buildings? not sure, but, from the sounds of it, they can aim them fairly well, well enough to at least talk to submarines deep under water on the opposite side of the planet. What would happen if a missile flew threw an intensified version of that?, no clue, but I'd imagine it could damage the fairly sensitive electronics inside. My search purpose was much more malicious than shooting down missiles though. And it wasn't until I ran across a video on the Discovery Channel of all places. www.google.com/video "Owning the Weather" There is a part of this dedicated to HAARP which states not only how/why HAARP exists and is afforded, but very clearly states that HAARP has the ability and the power to heat a 400sq mile area to 50,000 degrees. Now, I know missiles and rockets are reentry vehicles with LOTS of heat shielding but 50,000degrees seems like enough to liquify anything, if not at least a few wires on the guidance system. But the real trick wasn't 400 sq miles to 50,000degrees, but what about 0.4sq miles? Hot enough to topple a building from 6,000 miles away? Plausible? Seems like it could be? But another part of the video brought up an even more interesting theory to me... or conspiracy. What if HAARP were used to heat oceans to 'guide' hurricanes? or tsunamis? Do you realize how many oil ports in the Texas area got their contracts renewed after Katrina went through? I read in Forbes the insurance claims were upwards of $1.5billion for the oil infrastructure alone as a direct result to Katrina. Tsunamis are another story altogether. But if I remember not too long ago, a country, a single country was locked down with the only route from Iraq/n to Vietnam w/out going through China. So locked down that even after pleas to accept tsunami aid relief, it still didn't accept it and starved millions. Hit it with a tsunami, force them to accept aid relief, and open the country up from there. My point is, space shuttles, natural disasters, and missile defense were all mentioned in the Operation Northwoods documents under Kennedy, and HAARP seems the perfect weapon of war to allow many to come to fruition. Maybe I'm crazy, but it seems enough other people are too to justify PopSci doing an article about it.



Download Our iPhone App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed



Become a Fan On Facebook

Share links with friends, comment on stories and more


December 2009: Best of What's New

In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.

Check out the best of what's new here.

Popular Science Photo Pool


Share your photos in the Pop Sci pool at www.flickr.com!
tags_sprite.png
POP_embeddedForm_cover_May09.jpg