A couple of days ago, it was big news when ice was found on Mars. Now, an upcoming study in the journal Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta claims that the Martian environment was once wet enough to produce morning dew. This finding runs counter to the more widely accepted view that liquid water on Mars seeped up from the ground, rather than falling from the sky as precipitation.
It would be nice to see an article that is significant about Mars. We have been hearing the same story since the 70's. Speculative words are always being used such as "Apparently"& "Possibility" findings of water. What if "definitely" there is no water, would NASA lose it's funding? Where is the flip side to this argument? We never hear that water can NOT exist on the surface of Mars. Due to the low pressures, water will boil off the surface into space. BTW... it is the Pheonix "Lander"... not a rover.
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.
Check out the best of what's new here.