• The Environment

    Looming Eco-Disasters

    By Posted on 6.13.2008 14 Comments

    6.27.2008 at 02:29pm - Comment by djscotty2

    The editor of Popular Science needs to screen the text of such articles. This kind of article should not be the direction of Popular Science. Nothing scientific was given in the article. If you went down the path of the article, it would seem to suggest people should not breathe air because they generate C02, should not eat because they excrement methane producing materials, should not use electricity because it means power plants are needed. Yes we need to be mindful of the resources and the planet God gave us and be good stewards of it, but this article is so far from being one of science that it is shameful to see it even represented from an American Company, let alone one with SCIENCE in its NAME. David Scott 27 June 2008 David Scott Development Engineer Mining Truck Development Komatsu America Corp. Peoria, IL 61650



Download Our iPhone App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed



Become a Fan On Facebook

Share links with friends, comment on stories and more


December 2009: Best of What's New

In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.

Check out the best of what's new here.

Popular Science Photo Pool


Share your photos in the Pop Sci pool at www.flickr.com!
tags_sprite.png
POP_embeddedForm_cover_May09.jpg