For a century and more the U.S was seen as the destination for forward thinkers. It is sad to me that this icon of technological superiority would, at least appear, to be falling into the abyss of religious dogma. I think for my own part, if someone started talking to me about teaching creationism in the class room my response might go something like this: "Well if we teach the Christian view of creation, to be fair, we shall have to include other religion's views such as Hindi, Native American, Shinto and even Scientology." And see what they say then.
I know a lot of people don't like big oil, being a part of big oil myself I can say this: I personally would love to see technology like this succeed as soon as possible. I would love to see funding from the Canadian government on this project. Unfortunately being a close follower of the ITER project I understand that Canada doesn't really fund fusion research. Looks great though, and to have a proof of concept model is great.
From converting your lawn mower to solar power to brewing your own biofuel, there are plenty of steps the more industrious green citizen can take beyond recycling and CF bulbs. Get started below.
First: Why is it when people want to denigrate something they call it a liberal agenda? Second: I am always stunned to hear someone talk as though the global warming was still being debated. It is no longer theory. Prime Minister Stephen Harper's comments were not that global warming didn't exist, but that the concept of carbon trading is not viable. If you actually listen to the man speak, besides just hearing what you want to hear, you'd notice he takes the issue of global warming very seriously. The Geochemical Society is a lobby group, so of course they'd award someone's book that backs up their mission. Dr. Nir Shaviv's position that solar activity accounts for a large part of 20th century global warming doesn't argue against man-made global warming at all, unsurprisingly since the two topics are unrelated but often confused by both the doom sayers and naysayers. In the end your response is something I see as being very typical of people still clinging to mistaken thought that climate change is still a theory to be proven. Highlighting little bits of statements by some and ignoring the rest of the discussion in a vain attempt to leverage your view. By the way, I vote conservative.
Ah, college graduation! The first rites of adulthood in which campus living, the meal plan, and 1-800-COLLECT are readily traded for a rented studio apartment, long hours at the office, and rush-hour traffic. What’s not to be depressed about? Echoing the cold comfort your parents probably gave during this rude awakening as you sobbed to them using your non-subsidized cellphone, a recent analysis by Canadian researchers confirms that many recent grads feel this way . . . and things really do get better.
Maybe you just consign yourself to a life of indentured servitude? "As a child I dreamed of being an astronaut, now I find joy at sleeping in past eight."
A console version of Civilization? For many PC gamers, that's as heretical as a Citizen Kane TV series–you just don't mess with the classics of popular culture. In this case, though, the man helming the project is the same guy who started it all, legendary designer Sid Meier. After struggling with the challenge for two years, Sid's found a way to streamline his turn-based strategy game without lobotomizing it.
The civilization series stands the test of time because of the lengthly scenarios. You invested time in taking a tribe and bringing it to supremacy through the many hours of game play. In fact the worst thing you could have in the game is to be spawned to close to another civilization which would make you have to go war to quickly and then get out paced technologically by more isolated ones. Of course if you did get too far behind you could still hope that your little archers could stave off the invading knights if you had some walls or perhaps the terrain bonus, but it sounds with the consoles you get one step behind and your done. My hopes for the console version after this review are not high.
Bel-Air Cost to Develop: $236,000 Time: 1 year Prototype | | | | | Product Your home could be emitting toxic gases. Just ask the victims of Hurricane Katrina, whose emergency trailers, made with glue-laden particleboard, let off so much formaldehyde that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warned that residents should spend time outdoors and make relocating to permanent housing a priority. Even in more expensive new homes, the concentration of emissions from things like furniture, carpet and paint can be two to five times as high as it is outdoors. But most air filters only catch particulates such as dust and pollen rather than organic compounds like formaldehyde and benzene, and the filters that do trap those gases need frequent replacement. So Mathieu LeHanneur and David Edwards built an ultra-efficient filtration system that eliminates toxins using natures own hazmat squad: plants.
I believe the filter brings the air through both the plant area, the roots and the liquid in the soil. Sort of like three filters instead of just having go by the leaves. I see positives because, let's face it, opening the window to fresh air anywhere close to a city or plant is a misnomer.
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.
Check out the best of what's new here.