Silicon wafers. Quantum computing. Light-based processors. Any way you slice it, scientists say that processor speeds will absolutely max out at a certain point, regardless of how hardware or software are implemented. Lev Levitin and Tommaso Toffoli, two researchers at Boston University, devised an equation which sets a fundamental limit for quantum computing speeds. According to their studies, a perfect quantum computer can generate 10 quadrillion more operations per second than fastest current processors. They estimate that the maximum speed will be reached in 75 years.
While I do believe that there are limits to physical processes, such as how fast a computer processor can operate, I find that making an accurate prediction for how fast a quantum computer can run to be dubious at best, as we don't even have the technology or know-how to build one yet. I don't claim to be an expert on this subject, but I do know that people can rarely predict the future with any accuracy. There have been many things deemed impossible over the years by educated men of science that are in fact quite possible and relied upon today for modern technology. To say that computing speed has an upper limit is nothing but the truth; but to try and predict what that limit might be is not an easy task, and any answer to that question should be taken with a grain of salt.
Every few years, a new claim of successful cold fusion shows up in the news. It's the mythical holy grail of energy production. Nuclear fusion—the mashing together of two hydrogen atoms into a helium atom with an accompanying release of energy—is currently only the province of stars, requiring tremendous pressure and heat to succeed. Cold fusion, which is still very much a fantasy, aims to do the same without the pressure and heat. While we continue to see false progress toward viable cold fusion, our goals in the realm of real fusion may have just become a little more realized.
While it's true that the equipment needed to sustain nuclear fusion is expensive, that is not the main obstacle to having widespread fusion as a power source. The main problem is that with current technology we have to put more energy into creating fusion than we get back from it. Plus to my knowledge scientists have been unable to sustain a fusion reaction for more than a very brief period of time. This is because the superheated plasma they use to create fusion is so hot no material could come in contact with it without instantly vaporizing. This makes it extremely difficult to contain. They are trying to solve this problem by containing the plasma magnetically so that it doesn't actually have to come in contact with anything. The problem they are having however, is that the magnetic fields they are using are imperfect and can only hold the plasma for a short time before it manages to escape. This of course causes the reaction to automatically stop before the whole system is damaged from leaking plasma. A better magnetic field must be created before this problem can be overcome. That and the first reason I listed plus several others I'm sure is why we do not yet have a fusion powered world.
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.
Check out the best of what's new here.