Its about time. After an excruciating and absurd debate, double-amputee sprinter Oscar Pistorius will be allowed to compete in the Olympics. Pistorius won his appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport today which immediately overturned an asinine ruling by the International Association of Athletics Federations which stated Pistorius gained an unfair advantage from his prosthetics.
So, what happens when a blind person is given bio-mechanical/artificial eyes (sometime in the future) allowing them to have 20/10 vision, and this person wants to compete in the shooting event? What happens when someone decides to have their legs amputated so they themselves can have prostetics giving them an unfair advantage over others? I know it's extreme but it's definitely not far fetched. Olympians aren't allowed to use steroids, they shouldn't be allowed to turn themselves into cyborgs and compete without legs when everyone else has to. Where does it end? It sets a precedent that I'm sure will be challenged in the near future.
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.
Check out the best of what's new here.