After several centuries of casting and counting ballots, it’s shocking that we still haven’t mastered what seems to be a simple task. But anyone who lived through the 2000 presidential election, in which a mishmash of flawed voting machines, contradictory county procedures, and unclear state laws in Florida led to the least reliable outcome in history, knows that 21st century voting is no better than the era when we shouted out our votes at the courthouse steps.
As an election judge in suburban Cook County Illinois I can speak for the way things are done here. There is a choice of optical scan ballot and touch screen voting. The touch screen includes a printer that prints a paper ballot that the voter reviews. Before the voter leaves the machine, the ballot is rolled off the screen and retained inside the machine. The paper in the touch screen machines is the actual offical ballot, and is treated the same way, with the same protections, as the optical scan ballots. One of the election judges in each precinct receives extra training on the machines that includes how to change the tapes if necessary. The touch screens have features that allow unassisted voting by the blind, and those who can't use their hands (sip and puff) or both.
After several centuries of casting and counting ballots, it’s shocking that we still haven’t mastered what seems to be a simple task. But anyone who lived through the 2000 presidential election, in which a mishmash of flawed voting machines, contradictory county procedures, and unclear state laws in Florida led to the least reliable outcome in history, knows that 21st century voting is no better than the era when we shouted out our votes at the courthouse steps.
As an election judge in suburban Cook County Illinois I can speak for the way things are done here. There is a choice of optical scan ballot and touch screen voting. The touch screen includes a printer that prints a paper ballot that the voter reviews. Before the voter leaves the machine, the ballot is rolled off the screen and retained inside the machine. The paper in the touch screen machines is the actual offical ballot, and is treated the same way, with the same protections, as the optical scan ballots. One of the election judges in each precinct receives extra training on the machines that includes how to change the tapes if necessary. The touch screens have features that allow unassisted voting by the blind, and those who can't use their hands (sip and puff) or both.
After several centuries of casting and counting ballots, it’s shocking that we still haven’t mastered what seems to be a simple task. But anyone who lived through the 2000 presidential election, in which a mishmash of flawed voting machines, contradictory county procedures, and unclear state laws in Florida led to the least reliable outcome in history, knows that 21st century voting is no better than the era when we shouted out our votes at the courthouse steps.
As an election judge in suburban Cook County Illinois I can speak for the way things are done here. There is a choice of optical scan ballot and touch screen voting. The touch screen includes a printer that prints a paper ballot that the voter reviews. Before the voter leaves the machine, the ballot is rolled off the screen and retained inside the machine. The paper in the touch screen machines is the actual offical ballot, and is treated the same way, with the same protections, as the optical scan ballots. One of the election judges in each precinct receives extra training on the machines that includes how to change the tapes if necessary. The touch screens have features that allow unassisted voting by the blind, and those who can't use their hands (sip and puff) or both.
After several centuries of casting and counting ballots, it’s shocking that we still haven’t mastered what seems to be a simple task. But anyone who lived through the 2000 presidential election, in which a mishmash of flawed voting machines, contradictory county procedures, and unclear state laws in Florida led to the least reliable outcome in history, knows that 21st century voting is no better than the era when we shouted out our votes at the courthouse steps.
As an election judge in suburban Cook County Illinois I can speak for the way things are done here. There is a choice of optical scan ballot and touch screen voting. The touch screen includes a printer that prints a paper ballot that the voter reviews. Before the voter leaves the machine, the ballot is rolled off the screen and retained inside the machine. The paper in the touch screen machines is the actual offical ballot, and is treated the same way, with the same protections, as the optical scan ballots. One of the election judges in each precinct receives extra training on the machines that includes how to change the tapes if necessary. The touch screens have features that allow unassisted voting by the blind, and those who can't use their hands (sip and puff) or both.
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.
Check out the best of what's new here.