Comments

I think there are three kinds of people in the comments section of this article. There are those against HAARP, those with HAARP, and those who think people should just keep an open mind. I personally think the article could have used a little more coverage of the subject in greater detail. On the other hand you can't really blame it for being biased, since all reporters are that way. You have to read an article and decide what to believe and what's just irrelevant. For example the key word "Tin-foil hats", was used to make all the anti-HAARP people appear ignorant and radical. It could be that some of them actually are, but it doesn't necessarily mean it's true and you don't have necessarily to believe it. If look at the topic taking in a broad range of views into consideration, you will come up with a well based conclusion. Mine is that HAARP is probably another one of those places, were because it's remote and appears to have a mysterious background, has become a center of attention for people that love rumors. Another example of such a place is area 51. I don't require for you to agree with me, but just don't believe everything you read or hear.

I can see that this disater is a big one, what I can't see is how people will sometimes say things like this are preventable. I believe that natrual disater warnings are like wild guesses in the casino, sometimes you win sometimes youl lose. One thing's for certain.... the outcome can be a lifesaver or a catastrophy. I hope that efforts will be made to help those people down there though.